Skip to comments.Pastor James Manning Banned From YouTube For "Hate Speech"
Posted on 10/29/2009 3:05:14 AM PDT by JoeSeales
Though his channel remains public, Pastor James David Manning has been restricted from posting new material on YouTube for hate speech, simply for stating his religious views.
With the passage of the new hate crimes bill, this opens up the door for an all out assault on religion and free speech.
Ive reported several times over the last week that the most popular YouTube channel dedicated to Michael Savage has been repeatedly banned from YouTube over the last few days. Who will be next?
YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV3Mjp4sfm0
My Thoughts: http://www.joeseales.com/?p=64
(Excerpt) Read more at joeseales.com ...
That’s crap. Has Louis Farrakan been restricted?
seems potential for a lawsuit. It may depend on how well they crafted their policy
I think we will increasingly need to find off-shore locations to host content. With the way things are going, we will eventually have more liberties with data centers located in China, Russia or Iran than here in the states.
You Tube has always banned people they do not like - numerous flaps made them recant somewhat, but now they have a law that supports their leftist ideology. Get used to it, or find a different service.
Good point! Perhaps the UN hate speech efforts will restrict that possiblity as well.
I feel sure that this is just the beginning.
They will cut guys like Savage very slowly, one at a time.
If I recall, the old tick is to cut the air off slowly till everyone is asleep.
Screwtube censorsh!t strikes again.
Hate to sound paranoid, but we ought to look into revitalizing or creating a fidonet type of thing...
They still love Rev. Wright though...
Its sad to realize that those who love free speech will be forced to offshore servers. Is there anyway to find a listing of offshore servers?
And does You tube have any competition?
OK, I read the “what is Fidonet” part but I don’t understand it.
What is Fidonet? in English please.
Time for a SCOTUS challenge.
He called 0bammy a “long legged Mack daddy” and that is hate speech? I’ll bet Valerie Jarrett or some other White House flunky complained to the google twins
Did you see CSPAN when they allowed a moron to advocate the end of the White Race?
Kamau Kambon, a black activist and “professor” made a speech, which was broadcast on C-SPAN, calling for the extermination of the White Race:
And we have to start thinking about a solution to the problem. So that these young sisters and brothers who are here now, who are 15, 16, 17, are not here 25 years later talking about these same problems.
Now how do I know that the white people know that we are going to come up with a solution to the problem. I know it because they have retina scans, racial profiling, DNA banks, and theyre monitoring our people to try to prevent the ONE person from coming up with the ONE idea. And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people because that in my estimation is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet to solve the problem. [tepid applause] Now I dont care whether you clap or not but Im saying to you that we need to solve this problem because they are going to kill us. And I will leave on that. So we just have to set up our own system and stop playing and get very serious and not get diverted from coming up with a solution to the problem and the problem on the planet is white people.
- Kamau Kambon
Sort of a "pre-Internet" network of e-mail servers that used phone lines and modems to allow relaying e-mails between servers.
Very primitive compared to what we have now...but it doesn't depend upon the government controlled and monitored Internet
Along with that is the idea of logging on to bulletin board servers using phone networks and modems...slower and less convenient, but there is no dependence on the Internet
“What is Fidonet? in English please. “
Seems to originate from the UK, but with site in the US.
The UK is getting worse then the US, as in the ban of Michael Savage, so I doubt that they will be of much use.
They are going down the tubes just as fast, if not faster then the USA.
I will start looking here in the Pacific for alternates.
In any emergency, IRC might stay up longer then anything.
It was widely used in GW one.
It is as old as the internet, and I still use it for chat, worldwide.
Ah, Thank you.
Sad that is may have come to this.
This is bs. Didn’t take long for that hate bill junk to start happening.
I assume youtube is privately owned. Their playground.
Go ahead and try that, Mr. Kambon. Start at my house and see how that works out for you.
Now I dont care whether you clap or not but Im saying to you that we need to solve this problem because they are going to kill us.
Not at all. I don't want to hurt ANYONE, unless - they try to hurt me first. Then all bets are off. I wouldn't unmuzzle that dog if I were you, Mr. Kambon.
Obammie the Commie’s brownshirts busy at work shutting down all opposition.
Bingo. Why are so many people here advocating lawsuits or worse? If you had a video website and didn’t want to allow pro-homosexual videos, thatd be your call too, whether people like it or not.
Could it be his rants on wanting all the whites out of Harlem?
Those who are web technodweebs, please PM me.
I think I have an idea.
Rather tepid when compared with the position of the post-human eco-freaks, who want to exterminate the entirety of mankind..
Enlightenment thinking gone amok.
Youtube isn’t privately owned.
They are owned by Google which will have shareholder implications.
I suspect Rev. Manning has been receiving threats as well. He has mentioned a few times over the last week that “they might put me in jail, but i won’t go away”.
So you’ve got Rev. Manning being silenced on youtube (for starters), Michael Savage being silenced and Lou Dobbs receiving death threats and his home being shot at with his wife in the driveway. And the rest of the media has gotten the strong hint that if they act like Fox News they will be bad mouthed and lied about and maybe even worse. Their FCC licenses revoked?
This is it folks. It’s on. They’re going after the people and the media that bring us together and let us express our right to free speech and hear the free speech of others.
YT is owned by Google. We already know Google's political bent.
Is there an alternative to YouTube—one that people actually use?
And they are publicly traded and therefore fair game. I forgot that google bought them.
That is the only thing that will come from this new hate-crimes bill.
Lawsuits. And bunches of ‘em.
What’s so bad about “long-legged Mack Daddy”?
Dang, I love that guy! First time I ever heard the phrase “long legged mac daddy”.
‘I think we will increasingly need to find off-shore locations to host content. “
If I were out to ban “hate speech” I’d fine any local node server for distributing it. An offshore host won’t work well if the DNS servers, backbone routers, and local nodes get big fines for “distributing hate speech”.
you tube is a long legged mack daddy!
This is not Breaking News. Please read our forum rules with guidelines regarding posting material.
We have learned this lesson in the past with BigMedia and BigAcademia. Conservatives vacated the field and left it to the leftists who used it to bash us relentlessly and sell their potion of moral license and big brotherism to the nation.
Slowly, conservatism is getting its voice heard through outlets like EIP, talk radio, and some on FoxNews.
On the internet, the freedom of blogdom made it possible for many outlets, Free Republic being the premier conservative site, to thrive and have an impact.
Rather than bemoan YouTube (and I’m sure FaceBook and Twitter will follow), conservatives should approach a technically proficient conservative with the ability and resources to put up a FreeTube, a FreeBook, and a Free-ter.
Maybe our own Robinson family, with their contacts in cyberworld, knows someone(s) with that mix of expertise and resource.
That is untrue .
This isn't a freedom of speech issue. It's about someone who owns an asset being able to say what is and is not permitted on their property. It's the same reason the owner of Free Republic has the right to moderate or determine what is permissible to publish - it's his property.
If the courts were allowed to step in and say freedom of speech applied, Free Republic wouldn't be able to stop radical liberals from posting their own stories or drowning out the discussion here. We may not like the application in this particular instance, but the Constitutional right to determine what is and is not permissible on your "land", so to speak, must be protected at all costs.
And there are others.
Guys, just to let you all know, there is another video site where conservatives won't get harassed and erased like they do on YouTube.
In fact, Rev. Manning's latest is up there.
It is called NMATV.com (http://www.nmatv.com/)
Get over there and visit often.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.