Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norman Rockwell: The Original King of the Photoshop
gizmodo.com ^ | Oct 23 2009 | Wilson Rothman

Posted on 10/29/2009 1:34:25 PM PDT by Daffynition

Back when Norman Rockwell ruled Saturday evenings, Adobe wasn't even a gleam in some nerd's eye, but a new book shows that the painter was, nevertheless, a photoshop god.

Very few Gizmodo readers were even born when Rockwell painted his last Saturday Evening Post cover, but we all know them. You hear that name and suddenly you can picture those overly detailed, cartoonishly dramatic but ultimately kinda corny depictions of American life. Well, Norman Rockwell: Behind the Camera, written and compiled by Ron Schick, has given me immense newfound respect for the man, for the meticulous photography, the real people and the unintentionally hilarious DIY props and sets that he required to make his painted fantasies of Americana come true.

The book is not about painting. Rockwell's oil-on-canvas work feels like an afterthought for Schick, who mostly documents Rockwell's photography and art direction. Throughout the book, you see a painting, then you see the photographs he took to make that painting. In most cases, many shots comprise the different elements, and are joined together only in paint. It's almost sad: Vivid interactions between people, remembered jointly in the country's collective consciousness, may never have taken place. Even people facing each other at point blank range were photographed separately, and might never have even met.

The photos are as memorable as the paintings: There's a little boy whose feet are propped up on thick books, a walking still-life; there's a naked lady who ended up a mermaid in a lobster trap; there are men and women in various states of frustration, concentration and bliss, whose facial expressions defined Rockwell's style. These were mostly not agency models, but friends and neighbors who were pleased to help out, but not always thrilled by the finished product.

Since Rockwell was one of the most commercially successful artists of all time, you can imagine the rights to all of his images (paintings and photos) are carefully managed. The publisher was kind enough to let us show you the book cover plus two additional pairings, below. I encourage you to buy the book ($26.40 at Amazon)—what you see here is just a quick lick of the spoon:

Going and Coming, 1947 You'll notice the book jacket shows a painting of a family embarking on a summer vacation—Granny, Spot and all—coupled with a photo of a similar scene with far less action. There's a kid sticking out of the car in both, but many family members are missing. This is because they were photographed separately, in Rockwell's studio, and painted in where needed. (You'll also notice that the photo on the jacket is reversed—the car was pointed in the other direction but I suppose that wouldn't have looked as cool.)

Circus, 1955 What I liked about this picture is that you get to see how ridiculous Rockwell's sets could often be. He needed real faces, but he could fill in the rest. Hence piling chairs up on top of an old desk to simulate bleachers at the circus. Good thing nobody fell off the back and sued ole Rocky for millions—that twine used to hold the little girl's chair in place doesn't look OSHA certified. If the geeky looking fellow in the front looks familiar, it's because Rockwell himself served as a model for his paintings all the time.

The Final Impossibility: Man's Tracks on the Moon, 1969 Yep, here's proof that the moon landing was faked. At least, Rockwell's commemorative portrait of it was. NASA loved his work, so they loaned him spacesuits and helmets whenever he wanted, and for this, he got permission to photograph his models moonwalking around an Apollo Lunar Lander, with a black tarp doubling for infinity and beyond. Remember, this is when Apollo was new and the Cold War was in full swing, so getting access to the latest NASA toys took clout.

Behind the Camera covers many aspects of Rockwell that I had not known about previously. He was an outspoken civil rights activist, and many of his paintings dealt with race relations. There is a painting of two murdered men, one black and one white, accompanied by an almost absurd photo of two very alive guys lying side by side, eyes closed, on a carpet. There's another painting of a little black girl being walked to school by US Marshals, and the many different closeup shots Rockwell required to paint the extreme detail of the tense, potent—and fabricated—moment.

I wish I could run a gallery of 100 shots from this book, because each page startled me in a different way. Meeting the real people behind the paintings, and learning that every painting was composed of masterfully planned photographs—always black and white, since the artist let his imagination add the color—I will no longer take Norman Rockwell for granted. In fact, I'm gonna kinda worship him from now on.




TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; History; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: americana; art; fakephotos; fauxtography; normanrockwell; nostalgia; photoshop; rockwell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: a fool in paradise

That looks like Tom Selleck.


61 posted on 10/29/2009 2:44:16 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns
His work represents the America I WANT to live in.

Ooogedy-boogedy! You do realize Rockwell included blacks in his portraits too right?

62 posted on 10/29/2009 2:45:20 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Fritz wasn’t counterculture in the early 1960s. But the character morphes as Robert grew older. And eventually he killed the character off when the movie got made without his control.


63 posted on 10/29/2009 2:45:38 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw

That was the picture I was thinking of when someone mentioned ghettos. He also painted the picture of the little black girl on her way to school, with the tomatoes being thrown..I love his paintings..


64 posted on 10/29/2009 2:45:46 PM PDT by pesto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I love the movie. I think every teenage wannabe hippie should be required to watch it and should be quizzed on it. It’s a very good demythologizing of the 60s counterculture. Gritty and cynical.


65 posted on 10/29/2009 2:50:42 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

66 posted on 10/29/2009 3:09:04 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Funny you should mention Lennon:

On October 10, 1980, Mark David Chapman sold his beloved lithograph of Norman Rockwell’s Triple Self-Portrait to a Hawaiian public relations man for $7500. Chapman, who was strapped for cash, used the proceeds to quit his job, purchase a .38 revolver, buy airfare to New York and book a room at the Waldorf Astoria. From this base of operations he would stalk John Lennon at the Dakota and finally, in December, take his life.

67 posted on 10/29/2009 4:28:58 PM PDT by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Weird.


68 posted on 10/29/2009 4:30:07 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
LOL ...I see what you did there...........and...............

You can't do that! LOL


69 posted on 10/29/2009 4:32:36 PM PDT by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Mmmmmmm....


70 posted on 10/29/2009 4:41:26 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Bad Girl


71 posted on 10/29/2009 4:56:58 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

72 posted on 10/29/2009 6:40:41 PM PDT by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Academy Award-winning director and producer Steven Spielberg has turned over to federal authorities Russian Schoolroom, a 1967 oil on canvas by Norman Rockwell that was filched from a Clayton art gallery in 1973, according to the FBI. No charges have been filed in the case, and federal officials say they have no evidence that Spielberg knew the painting had been stolen when he purchased it in 1989.


73 posted on 10/29/2009 6:55:02 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Thanks for the ping. I knew that Normal Rockwell painted from photographs of real people, but I didn’t know his paintings were composed from many different photographs.


74 posted on 10/29/2009 7:06:12 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
For me, Rockwell represented America as it should be; reminds me of another American who talked about The Shining City Upon A Hill.
75 posted on 10/29/2009 7:20:14 PM PDT by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

WOW. Caveat emptor.


76 posted on 10/29/2009 7:28:18 PM PDT by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: capydick; Seadog Bytes; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...

LOL! Great, capydick.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2374007/posts?page=48#48


77 posted on 10/29/2009 7:58:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

I’m with you!

My mother was an artist and LOVED rockwells paintings(she grew up on his stuff on the front of the post.

His idea of what America was is exactly what my america was when i was growing up! small town america was still wholesome just a few years ago!

I can relate to just about every painting he ever did.

when I die...i hope heaven is like a norman rockwell painting.


78 posted on 10/29/2009 8:47:09 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"...Ooogedy-boogedy! You do realize Rockwell included blacks in his portraits too right?..."

Um, what does that have to do with anything? My vision of an ideal America is not predicated on the absence of black people. That is stupid and racist, and I don't quite get your point.

79 posted on 10/30/2009 5:15:38 AM PDT by I Buried My Guns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dg0048
"...The America you want to live in is a complete fantasy..."

Just because you can never attain the ideal does not mean you should not strive for it. That mentality is one of failure and frankly, France. An attitude like yours is not one that made America great, but rather hurtles us head first towards mediocrity.

"... And would you like to elaborate on this ‘Civil War’ that you so hastily glorify?.."

There is nothing hasty about it, FRiend. It is well thought out and was once a worst-case scenario. Sadly, it looks more and more like our only option as time passes. With our Constitution being trampled daily by a foreign President, our values rendered moot or worse across the land at an increasing rate (see the war on Christmas, for example), And the characteristics that made our nation great being dragged through the gutter or destroyed outright, the question is not about the "Civil War I so hastily glorify" but rather the bubble you occupy that makes all that stuff invisible to you.

If you can't see what's coming down the pike, I can't help you, as it is wholly apparent to me and millions of other Americans.

80 posted on 10/30/2009 5:26:13 AM PDT by I Buried My Guns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson