Posted on 11/01/2009 4:12:13 PM PST by smokingfrog
Who stands with you? Republican Chris Christie opposes a womans right to choose.
Democrat Jon Corzines fought to protect it.
Republican Christie stands with the NRA and opposes banning armor piercing rifles.
Jon Corzines a leader in the fight against the gun lobby.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I’ve never seen a armor piercing rifle.
If one existed, I am sure even the Marines would have trouble using it.
**Who stands with you?
Armor piercing rifles. **
Not standing with THAT MORON!!
or If i must it will be BEHIND HIM!!!
Corzine is a zero and will get bounced on Tuesday. People are so fed up that even the Democrat machine in NJ is going to lose this one. They can’t turn out enough of the vote to protect this guy’s record of unaccomplishment.
They have been obsolete since 1940.
Careful......
Nobody thought Al Franken could get elected.
They always find a way....
I couldn’t find even one image of a tank impaled on a rifle...nor a coat of mail
What's known as the margin of lawyer...
ping
In a corrupt machine state like NJ, Christie needs to win by at least 5% to avoid any games. It's not over until Corzine's official concession. And maybe not even then.
Re: #7
If anybody could, I figured I could count on you.
Wow!!! If the rifle can pierce armor, imagine what the ammo could do!
LOL my first thought too, ping the pic man.
PTRS-41?
I spent most of my life in NJ. This morning I looked into the blog postings in what was my local newspaper there. First, you CAN’T find a conservative leaning paper in the state and the one from my old area is as liberal as all the rest.
Anyway, the postings were running 9 to 1 against Corzine. I lived there and during the massacre of the Dems in the early 90’s. The fever was running wild. It appears to be the same now. They question will be: turnout, the dem cheat factor, impact of the 3rd party candidate Dagget.
I want one!
I guess it is something you throw at them! Isn’t that called a spear? What a moron!
But....I am fairly tight with local LE (county and city). There is a huge problem with easy guns on the streets. Ten miles from here NYPD is taking guns off 13 year olds on a daily basis. The Suffolk County DA tells of a nine that was used in a murder that has a ballistics trail that covers seven shootings in three states.
It is a conundrum.
“There is a huge problem with easy guns on the streets.”
It’s not the guns. It’s never been the guns. It’s the fact that NYC and the environs are a liberal rabbit warren of corruption, criminal encouragement, and victim disarmament. Starting with the mayor of NYC - who apparently thinks his position gives him extra-state jurisdiction.
Not even Soros has enough $$$ to buy the votes and lawyers needed to overcome voter anger this time! He can only work his magic when the vote is very close. It won't be, this time or in 2010 or even 2012.
I don’t understand politicians when they say that the only fix is to ban guns, where there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Maybe it’s because nobody ever speaks truth to their lies. I’d destroy them in a debate.
An armor piercing rifle is anything hotter than a .22 long rifle.
We've got to stop protecting the barbarians on the basis of "equality". The rights of a citizen should be linked to responsibility and self discipline.
My right to self defense is one of the inalienable rights, I accept the reponsibility that goes with it, leave me alone!
No you're not. If you were you would understand making it harder for you to buy a gun doesn't affect the criminals. Start by changing the catch and release programs.
WTH is an armor piercing rifle? Does it have a sharp, pointy barrel?
________________________________________
Yes, I am. I wrote nothing about making more gun laws, did I?
What I wrote is that there is a problem with easy guns on the street. How about you tell us all how to keep 13 year olds from having gunfights...come on, what's your answer to the parents who bury the losers...
“How about you tell us all how to keep 13 year olds from having gunfights...come on, what’s your answer to the parents who bury the losers...”
We seem not to have problems with this where gun laws are lax. Perhaps it’s not the guns that are the problem.
Perhaps it’s the culture in your area.
Just a thought.
Sounds like your neighborhood is the conundrum.
Are you going to give up your guns since you want everyone else to?
________________________________________
A. There are kids with guns in every part of this country.
B. Show me where I wrote that I want anyone to give up his guns (guess what, you can't because I didn't)
C. You're an idiot. I can't think of any other reason for how you reached these conclusions based on what I actually wrote.
Oh, and have a nice day.
“A. There are kids with guns in every part of this country.”
In actual America, we call them “hunters” or “members of the junior rifle team”, for the most part.
The problem is local and it isn’t guns. Crime rates tend to skyrocket where:
A. guns are restricted (like where you are)
B. there are large cities with liberal governments (where you are).
None of the clever responses offers a solution or even a suggestion on how to keep guns out of the hands of kids or gangs. You may stick your head in the sand about it but it is a genuine issue.
__________________________________________
Actual America? Kiss my royal Irish ass.
“None of the clever responses offers a solution or even a suggestion on how to keep guns out of the hands of kids or gangs. You may stick your head in the sand about it but it is a genuine issue.”
IN YOUR AREA.
Fix your culture. Enforce the existing laws. Remove illegal restrictions to allow the law-abiding to go armed. Do not coddle criminals. The problem, as you see it, will fix itself and NYC and the surrounding area will go back to what Scalia talked about: riding on the subway with a .22 with no one commenting.
You aren’t the first New Yorker to think New York is “normal”, I guess.
Bust up the gangs and stick to your own knitting - keep your mayor’s “investigators” in their own damn state.
___________________________________________________
Hey swamp genius, show me where I wrote anything about your guns or your rights or anybody's rights....come on, use my words, give it a try. It's called intellectual honesty.
“Actual America? Kiss my royal Irish ass.”
Yes, “actual America”. As in - not NYC or LA.
A bayonet, perhaps?
The "spike" bayonet that comes with the Mosin-Nagant rifle might pierce some soft body armour.
I repeat...KMRIA.
That "but" is followed by a non-sequitur list of activities which are already very illegal several times over.
There is no conundrum. The crimes you enumerate are coupled with a near-complete inability of the law-abiding to oppose them. Enforce constitutional laws, defend constitutional rights - and crime will be defused insofar as crime can ever be eliminated. Let, even encourage, the law-abiding to carry unhindered and crime will find a safer venue.
“I repeat...KMRIA.”
You identify yourself as Irish. Perhaps you’d be happier there.
Just how are we to interpret your “conundrum” when the solution is obvious out here in flyover country?
You wrote it in regards to “LI” and “but”. Swampy there can’t just slap a Glock on his hip and go to the areas you describe - not because he’s a criminal (he’s not), but because LEOs there want to neuter EVERYONE ... and in doing so, they stomp the rights of the responsible and disciplined, while having little impact on the barbarians who want to abuse them. Your “but” line implies (intellectual honesty, ya know) a desire to further restrict rights in an attempt to reduce crimes which your very examples demonstrate such restrictions won’t & don’t reduce.
Before snapping back, go review your words as attached to the use of “but”.
You’re an idiot.
Oh, and have a nice day.
Post #23, between "but" and "conundrum". OK, it's not explicit, but the implication is unavoidable and the rhetoric is standard for "grabbers" (to wit: "I'm one of you, BUT here's a rhetorical list of problems solvable only by oppression").
Oh, and the bit about "royal" implies you're not quite on board with our Constitution.
Slow down man, and think. Something you wrote got a lot of people perturbed - it's probably something you wrote.
In my youth, there was this same potential problem of "guns on the streets."
My Dad's guns were in his closet, with the ammo for each on an easily reached shelf right above them. If I had a "beef" with a neighbor kid, or wanted some easy street cred with the older kids, nothing was stopping me from grabbing one of those guns and killing someone. And I knew how to use them, too.
After the age of 9, I wouldn't have even needed to use my Dad's gun, I could have used my own.
Don't ask me what to tell the parents, I have no idea how to create the utopia you seek.
Just don't try to do it on the back of my rights.
Something's gone wrong in parts of our culture, but don't make me fix it, I didn't break it in the first place.
______________________________________
A. Tell me where I wrote that I seek a utopia. You can't because I never did. I stated that there is a problem with kids carrying guns. There is.
B. Show me where I wrote anything about your rights. I'm waiting for you to show me in my words where I wrote anything like that. If you can I'll quit FR for good so go ahead...use my words.
____________________________________________
Oh, I get it. Pretend that kids don't have access to guns and are using them to kill each other or else I'm a gun-grabbing liberal.
I stated a problem that exists. You decide that my statement means other than that which it states. That's your problem, not mine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.