Skip to comments.
Baguette Dropped From Bird's Beak Shuts Down The Large Hadron Collider (Really)
PopSci ^
| 11/05/09
| Stuart Fox
Posted on 11/05/2009 4:31:31 PM PST by LibWhacker
The Large Hadron Collider, the world's most powerful particle accelerator, just cannot catch a break. First, a coolant leak destroyed some of the magnets that guide the energy beam. Then LHC officials postponed the restart of the machine to add additional safety features. Now, a bird dropping a piece of bread on a section of the accelerator has, according to the Register, shut down the whole operation.
The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery, eventually leading to significant over heating in parts of the accelerator. The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident, but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on, automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine.
This incident won't delay the reactivation of the facility later this month, but exposes yet another vulnerability of the what might be the most complex machine ever built. With freak accident after freak accident piling up over at CERN, the idea of time traveling particles returning from the future to prevent their own discovery is beginning to seem less and less far fetched.
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: baguette; bird; collider; hadron; lhc; napl; science; stringtheory
To: LibWhacker
Sounds like pretty sloppy engineering!
2
posted on
11/05/2009 4:34:11 PM PST
by
MIchaelTArchangel
(DEFUND THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE NOW!)
To: LibWhacker
Messages and warnings from the Universe...
3
posted on
11/05/2009 4:35:49 PM PST
by
La Lydia
To: LibWhacker
4
posted on
11/05/2009 4:37:02 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(A trade: Conservative Anglicans for Liberal Catholics and a heretic to be named later.)
To: LibWhacker
Oh, it’s haDRon!! I had the D and the R interchanged and thought it was about some encounter in San Francisco.
5
posted on
11/05/2009 4:37:09 PM PST
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: LibWhacker
Someone ‘up there’ doesn’t like this thing.
6
posted on
11/05/2009 4:37:44 PM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Hope....Change...Food Stamps!)
To: LibWhacker
...the idea of time traveling particles returning from the future to prevent their own discovery is beginning to seem less and less far fetched. Knowing how little I comprehend the purpose and ultimate good for mankind (?) this machine is for, I can only wonder how we'll know anything happened if the particles prevent their own discovery. My brain hurts, I'll stop wondering now.
7
posted on
11/05/2009 4:39:24 PM PST
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: LibWhacker
Must have been one stale piece of bread...
8
posted on
11/05/2009 4:39:59 PM PST
by
njslim
To: MIchaelTArchangel
You’d think they’d at least built a lean-to cover over equipment that can cause a system-wide failure.
9
posted on
11/05/2009 4:50:37 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(Ram "Health Care Reform" down our throats in '09, and we'll ram it up your @ss in '10.)
To: njslim
10
posted on
11/05/2009 4:51:31 PM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: skr
11
posted on
11/05/2009 4:51:54 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: skr
I’ve heard some people speculate there is a possibility that this machine could produce microscopic black holes. Of course the scientists say that they have done some calculations, and these black holes, if created, probably wouldn’t actually suck up our entire planet. I guess that is reassuring.
To: LibWhacker
God works in mysterious ways....
13
posted on
11/05/2009 4:54:08 PM PST
by
silverleaf
(Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
To: MIchaelTArchangel
What could have gone wrong? The LHC combines the best practices of European engineering: French diligence; German imagination; and British organization.
To: LibWhacker
15
posted on
11/05/2009 5:25:26 PM PST
by
wyowolf
("we were the winners , cause we didn't know we could fail.")
To: silverleaf
Somethings going on. Bad design on a multi billion machine?
It's happened before and will again.
Or something somewhere will not let us do this.
There's a great sci-fi story in there.
Need to check probably already been written.
Need to figure out the implications of the above sentence
To: Rockingham
Are you sure Joseph “a gentleman doesn’t go motoring about after dark” Lucas didn’t have a hand in the engineering of this fine piece of equipment?
17
posted on
11/05/2009 5:34:05 PM PST
by
kickonly88
(I love fossil fuel!)
To: MIchaelTArchangel; LibWhacker
Honestly, it’s starting to sound more like engineering sabotage, more than “sloppy” engineering.
To: kickonly88
Now that you mention it, one of his acolytes must have been on the team.
To: LibWhacker; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
One more reason to hate the French.
20
posted on
11/05/2009 6:31:10 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
To: Slings and Arrows
So it's the world's most powerful particle accelerator and (presumably) cost billions .... and it can't stand up to .... birdies???
21
posted on
11/05/2009 6:36:41 PM PST
by
PERKY2004
(Proud Military Wife -- Please pray for our troops!)
To: PERKY2004
22
posted on
11/05/2009 6:40:12 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
23
posted on
11/05/2009 7:01:02 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Slings and Arrows
24
posted on
11/05/2009 7:12:20 PM PST
by
PERKY2004
(Proud Military Wife -- Please pray for our troops!)
To: LibWhacker
Well, a baguette is shaped like a large...
Oh. “Hadron.”
Nevermind.
25
posted on
11/05/2009 7:30:32 PM PST
by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
To: PERKY2004
26
posted on
11/05/2009 8:07:43 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
To: Boogieman
...these black holes, if created, probably wouldnt actually suck up our entire planet. I guess that is reassuring. It's good to know that our current black hole, aka Washington D.C., won't be lonely once it has some microscopic company.
27
posted on
11/06/2009 12:14:27 AM PST
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: La Lydia
Messages and warnings from the Universe...
yes
To: nomorelurker
29
posted on
11/06/2009 4:21:35 AM PST
by
Paradox
(ObamaCare = Logan's Run ; There is no Sanctuary!)
To: Rockingham
No doubt. What a great thread,me and the wife had some good laughs at the expense of this “machine”!
30
posted on
11/06/2009 5:15:28 AM PST
by
kickonly88
(I love fossil fuel!)
To: LibWhacker
These things are incredibly finicky. I've used a lot of apparatus in my career, accelerators, reactors, NMR, laser ablation, mass spec, et al. Of them all, accelerators gave me the most headaches for things going wrong at the worst times.
31
posted on
11/06/2009 5:21:25 AM PST
by
chimera
To: SunkenCiv
I've used the term “junk” with regards to this thing many times in the past. The competing international contractors being my main reason. The reality of even the best design being subjected to this much nepotism and shear waste actually functioning seems far-fetched to me. I've got a few emails to send out. :)
32
posted on
11/06/2009 5:52:50 AM PST
by
allmost
To: Slings and Arrows; Revolting cat!
Hadron, we haz a problem!
33
posted on
11/06/2009 8:31:25 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
To: chimera
You are right. Accelerators are probably the most challenging machines ever built by man, incluing reactors and moon-rockets and war machines.
I could give people here some some comparisons to give ideas of what type of vacuum, electronic, remote controls, magnet, heat loading, mechanical specifications, plumbing, monitoring, electrical stability, safety interlocks, number of components and miles of wire, massive computer programming, materials, radiation damages, etc.
However, I’ll limit to two examples:
The heat loading on components we had to deal with at the accelerator I worked at ranged up to 100watts/sq.mm. (Have you ever burned yourself on the 30,000mm3 surface of a 100watt light bulb?-— imagine having to deal with heat loading 30,000 times that heat.). Fortunately, most areas the heat loading was much more managable.
Second: the vacuums needed require that each and every joint and weld in these machine pass “leak tests” so stringent that it would take over 1000 years for a liter of air to make its way through the joint. A single fingerprint on the inner wall will corrupt the vacuum such that the machine would be useless for six months while it evaporates. The vacuum pumps used to maintain the vacuum can’t even be turned on until the pressure is one-ten-millionth of an Earth’s atmosphere.
34
posted on
11/06/2009 3:10:49 PM PST
by
AFPhys
((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
To: allmost
My guess is, the machine is a turkey. My previous take on it remains, which is, there’s no way to reproduce the results of any experiment run on the thing, because there is no other machine that can do what this thing can (well, can’t) do. :’)
35
posted on
11/06/2009 3:15:13 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: AFPhys
A single fingerprint That's why God gave us nitrile gloves.
36
posted on
11/06/2009 3:18:28 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: kickonly88
Joseph a gentleman doesnt go motoring about after dark Lucas I saw someone wearing a tee-shirt with that quote at a British car show recently. The shirt described Lucas as The Prince of Darkness.
37
posted on
11/06/2009 3:20:37 PM PST
by
Bob
To: AFPhys
The vacuum systems on the ones I worked on drove me nuts. I can remember disassembling and cleaning diffusion pumps at very early hours in the morning. Minor outgassing (no such thing really as “minor” outgassing, it was all a major hassle) would ruin an entire beamline and a dozen or so experiments running off of it. Just mounting an experiment took years of planning and months of work. We'd get quadrillions of events and maybe a few of significance. Back in the day there'd be miles of magtape just to record the events coming in on the data streams.
38
posted on
11/06/2009 5:41:27 PM PST
by
chimera
To: Bob
Not only that,Do you know why the English drink warm beer? Because Lucas makes refrigerators,too.
39
posted on
11/06/2009 5:59:48 PM PST
by
kickonly88
(I love fossil fuel!)
To: La Lydia
I gotta say, it does give one pause!
40
posted on
11/08/2009 4:50:22 PM PST
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: Boogieman
Yeah, that one silly little word....probably....
41
posted on
11/08/2009 4:52:32 PM PST
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson