Skip to comments.Apologies to John Charlton of The Post and Email. (Certifigate information in comments section)
Posted on 11/27/2009 7:33:39 PM PST by Smokeyblue
James H (Jim) Roberson Says: November 25, 2009 at 5:58 PM
Leo, Kudos for being a really BIG MAN !!! Dont you just wish that the Stone Waller-in-Chief had this kind of integrity ??? Thanks for deleting an uncivil Post that I once made (about inferences). During these stormy days for the Republic, we need All Hands on Deck. Every Patriot must muster UNITED TOGETHER.
On 31 Oct 2009, I sent the following email to HI Dept of Health:
Aloha Dr. Fukino and Ms. Okubo from sunny South Carolina and Old Dixie,
Conducting research, I have examined a significant number of Certifications of Live Births, issued by your Department, for children all born in Honolulu. The children differ, of course, by which year each child was born, and a large range in years is represented in the population of COLBs examined. All COLBs were printed using your laser printer, and thus all demonstrate the same basic layout format, and page spacings of form-words fields (i.e., CHILDs NAME, DATE OF BIRTH, MOTHERS RACE, etc. all occupy comparable locations on the page).
Aside from the different distinguishing information, specific to each child, that was inserted in the fields beneath the respective form-words, all COLBs appear identical except,
1.) Different years seemed to have a different style Border which I assume was intended to inhibit alterations ( say a young teenager wants to make a computer template, and then add a couple of years so they can buy tobacco or alcohol, etc. The young nippers are amazingly adroit with computers these days.), and
2.) On the lower left side of all COLBs, except for 1, the form-words: DATE ACCEPTED BY STATE REGISTRAR were printed. However, on 1 COLB the form-words: DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR were printed, instead.
As Im sure youll agree, Accepted and Filed carry different meanings, or nuances. For example, Accepted indicates that all required forms/information were present (and, nothing looked out-of-order) as specified by Standard Procedures and thus this connotes the Certificate of Birth was issued with few reservations as to its validity. On the other hand, Filed leaves the hint that perhaps the information supplied may be either insufficient, or questionable as to its accuracy. In this latter case, the Certificate of Birth might carry a less than full confidence as to its completeness, authenticity, authoritativeness, or trustworthiness.
Likewise, Registrar (which could be either a local, or Island, Registrar) might perhaps be different from the State Registrar ???
I would be most appreciative if you will help me with the following Questions:
1.) Am I reading too much into the different Words Choices ? (I dont want to sound sinister, or cynical.)
2.) Can you tell me under what circumstances would the above different Words Choices be required ?
3.) I have reviewed without success Hawaiis Chapter (Title/Section ?) 11 Rules and Procedures looking for a definition of when the above Words Choices should be imprinted on COLBs. Could you please provide me with a path that I could follow to learn about the wording prescribed to be used on these type certificates / documents ?, and finally,
4.) Would you hazard an educated guess (just a general ball park figure would do) as to approximately what proportion of COLBs issued carry the Filed vs. Accepted classifications ? Less than 1%, less than 10% ? Or, do I have a bad population of specimens ?
If you are required to be presented with an official UIPA request, in order to provide the above information, then please consider this e-mail as such. Thank you in advance for any help that you can give me.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
IN RESPONSE, I RECEIVED from Ms Janice Ukubo the following email:
Aloha Mr. Roberson,
Under the UIPA, the state is not required to answer all questions posed to it. Unfortunately, we are unable to help you at this time.
Please see attached response to your UIPA request.
(Note: THE ATTACHMENT THEY SENT WAS A 3 PAGE pdf Form. Only 2 blocks were checked, as shown below):
OIP 4 (rev. 8/29/08) NOTICE TO REQUESTER (Use multiple forms if necessary) TO: James H. Roberson FROM: Janice Okubo, Department of Health (808) 586-4442 (Agency/name & telephone number of contact person at agency) DATE REQUEST RECEIVED: 10/31/09 DATE OF THIS NOTICE: 11/13/09
GOVERNMENT RECORDS YOU REQUESTED (attach copy of request or provide brief description below): 1. Request is attached 2. 3. 4.
NOTICE IS PROVIDED TO YOU THAT YOUR REQUEST:
(Blank Box) Will be granted in its entirety.
(Checked Box) Cannot be granted because
(Blank Box) Agency does not maintain the records. Agency believed to maintain records:
(Checked Box) Agency needs a further description or clarification of the records requested.
(Blank Box) Please contact the agency and provide the following information: government records you are requesting.
(All other Boxes on 3 pages were Blank)
LEO, Their refusal to simply provide me with either a Statute or Regulation Number that specifies how COLBs are to be classified (as Filed or Accepted) is all the evidence that I need that their is something extremely embarassing in their files. What they are hiding is obviously worth more than $1.4 million !
What would you recommend that I do to compel HDoH to furnish me a Non-Confidential Statute / Reg. No. that defines How Public Documents are to be classified (Filed or Accepted) ???
Has HDoH given YOU any further information, relative to your inquiries ???
PS My personal suspicion / speculation: They issued a COLB based solely on the Grandmothers Affidavit that she has a new Grandson. Beyond that, theyve got squat as supporting evidence. He could have been born ANYWHERE to ANYBODY. Hence, Filed instead of Accepted.
[ed. the DOH appears to be worried about the definition of "filed by registrar". I have seen this same UIPA request answered in the same manner. You'd think you could get a straight answer as to their own procedures... but no. They are basically Obama guardians and he has a vested interest in keeping you confused. It may not happen as fast as everyone wants, but I am going to follow through with more in Hawaii.]
This guy asked Hawaii through a UPIA request for clarification of "Date Accepted" and "Date Filed" terms.
Hawaii apparently won't answer. Very telling.
other states have the same thing...
One term for Certificate of Live Birth and another for Certification of Live birth...
Date filed and date received etc..
Its the Certificate of Live Birth that we havent seen...
verifying where he was actually born...
Tsukiyama resigns from Hawaii Office of Information Practices http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/tsukiyama-resigns-from-hawaii-office-of-information-practices/
Tsukiyama got promoted, big time http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/tsukiyama-got-promoted-big-time/
Leo shut down his blog. Very strange.
Who can blame him...he is probably taking ALL of efforts to generate enough resources to ultimately protect his family and property because that day is coming and at some point you have to make a choice...continuing peeing in the wind or build an outhouse.
Or rather a turret.
Whatever happened to Miss Tickly’s blog, documenting the approval process?
Does anyone have an alternate link or cache copy?
I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen.
By the numbers.
1. have seen the original vital records.
This does not state what these RECORDS [note the plural] are. Most people ONLY have one birth record, not RECORDS, indicating more then one. They are ONLY born once, not multiple times. So how does one get multiplr birth records?
Are these records like the Nordyke twins, registered long forms with the Dr, witinesses, et. Or are they a late filing, a foreign birth.
2. Obama was born in Hawaii.
Again, regardless of where he [Obama was born] he fails to meet the US Constitutional requirement.
3. and is a natural-born American citizen.
Fukinos personal opinion, not legal evidence in a court of law. And conflicts directly with case law, SR511, and other documented opinions and evidence that requires a minimum two US parents and Jurisdiction.
Based on her admission of multiple records, Obama could have been born anywhere, including Kenya, brought into the marriage by Obama Sr, who had multiple wifes and the adoption created the record that she is refering to.
Obama has not provided any documentation supporting his birth anywhere.
The COLB’s that were presented are forgeries.
Per the State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Vital Records.
Quote “The state seal is imbedded in the certificate by machine and the back of the certificate would have the printed signature of the State Registrar. The lettering is imbedded in the seal.”
What more does the State of Hawaii have to say.
Fact - Forgery prove
Maybe you posted a similar thing elsewhere...I find this one powerful
Maybe one of us did...I find it worthy of a ping
It may be time for Leo to point out to the State of Hawaii that they are obstructing justice and there is the possibility they could be prosecuted in the near future when they file their Quo Warranto lawsuit.
I tried to click on the link for Leo above, but now get the 404 Error message, is his site closed down???
I think Leo is busy with the case listed in the thread posted below and has closed his blog.
It’s amazing that Hawaii won’t answer questions that simply relate to terminology used on their legal forms. How are people suppose to decipher their meanings? This should all be standardized.
They just answering with total Smoke Screens deflections!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.