Skip to comments.Obama Treason Charges Advance In Tennessee Grand Jury
Posted on 11/29/2009 6:13:52 PM PST by USALiberty
On June 10, 2009 I wrote about formal treason charges filed against Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, in - Is Obama Guilty of Treason? I followed that column up with - Why Commander Fitzpatrick Is NOT Guilty of Mutiny! on June 13. Since then, numerous others have filed similar treason charges against Obama/Soetoro with little or no fanfare
If Obama is indeed guilty of treason - then we have a growing list of folks who are also committing treason. Namely, every member of law enforcement and the justice system who have taken an oath to uphold and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic - along with every individual in Washington DC and beyond who has chosen to look the other way while denying American citizens their day in court - claiming that no citizen has the legal standing to ask who in the hell Barack Hussein Obama really is
After visits from the Secret Service and months of rejection by the courts, Commander Walter Fitzpatrick may get his day in court.
On Tuesday December 1st 2009, Retired Navy Commander Walter Fitzpatrick III will present the evidence behind his treason complaint against Obama/Soetoro to all all thirteen members of a Tennessee Grand Jury in Monroe County Tennessee.
The road to justice has been bumpy, to say the least. Commander Fitzpatrick has been ridiculed, blocked in court house halls, threatened, accused of mutiny and labeled a crackpot by Obama supporters who see no need for a standard background check for the most powerful office in the world.
Now, this places the Tennessee Grand Jury squarely in the middle of the biggest Constitutional Crisis in U.S. history.
(Excerpt) Read more at americangrandjury.org ...
American Grand Jury is not a real grand jury. They're a silly organization of cranks filling the vacuum of comic nuttiness that Orly Taitz has left vacant and their ridiculous "presentments" will find no support among any legal authority. They're no different than the idiots and the left who tried to "arrest" Dick Cheney and the only thing they've succeeded at is in making Obama's legitimate opposition look unhinged.
Im all for ANYONE doing what they can to bring attention to Obamas crimes.
What crimes? Failing to show his long form BC? I think Obama is incompetent and unfit for office but those aren't crimes. While I'd like nothing more than to see him waving goodbye from the steps of Marine One on January 20th, 2013, I fail to see where he's a criminal. Screaming "Treason!" and "Usurper!" with nothing but internet conspiracies to back it up may make for great theater to the kool-aid drinkers but the rest of the country is rolling their eyes.
DON’T FEED THE PESTS!!!
“American Grand Jury is not a real grand jury. They’re a silly organization of cranks filling the vacuum of comic nuttiness that Orly Taitz has left vacant and their ridiculous “presentments” will find no support among any legal authority. They’re no different than the idiots and the left who tried to “arrest” Dick Cheney and the only thing they’ve succeeded at is in making Obama’s legitimate opposition look unhinged.”
“What crimes? Failing to show his long form BC? I think Obama is incompetent and unfit for office but those aren’t crimes. While I’d like nothing more than to see him waving goodbye from the steps of Marine One on January 20th, 2013, I fail to see where he’s a criminal. Screaming “Treason!” and “Usurper!” with nothing but internet conspiracies to back it up may make for great theater to the kool-aid drinkers but the rest of the country is rolling their eyes.”
What legal machinations could Obama use to frustrate the Grand Jury's ability to actually get these important documents?
This evening my family and I played a game of Monopoly and the bad news is that I lost, but the good news is that my son is now the official owner of a bunch of fancy hotels in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Maybe you could learn a little bit from what is happening to your “friends” or comrades in the Marine Corp by listening to the link on post 16 before you open your big mouth wide open, huh!!!
Every Government official including members of the military that suspect President Obama’s eligibility are failing at upholding and defending the Constitution.
Lying about his qualifications to be the President of the USA is criminal in itself. The qualifications he is lying about is those that are specifically listed in the Constitution of the USA. (Natural Born Citizen). He is more than welcome to prove us all wrong, but has made every effort to hide info that would prove his innocence.
Honest question: Do you think your spouse is eligible to run for President, or for that matter I???
A grand jury’s subpoena can be frustrated by an appeal to a Judge. There is a process where a subpoena can be appealed if it violates other established legal rules (like attorney / client privilege) or if it is unreasonable (produce 100,000 pages in two days). I suspect that Obama would want to claim that the grand jury does not have the authority, is not the venue to resolve, etc. Not sure if that would work as it all depends on the judge.
I don’t know your spouse, or Drew 68’s spouse, but I’d say there’s an excellent chance that both of them are more qualified to run for President than Hussein was. He’d never done an honest day’s work in his life, he had never even managed so much as a Sno-Cone stand, he most likely was not born in America, he hates this country. Most people are more qualified than he was.
Fitzpatrick was a Lt. Commander.
Kerchner publicly argued the courts have an obligation to make a decision on Obama’s eligibility.
He wrote, “The federal courts and judges are committing treason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdiction and getting to the merits in the various cases before them regarding the Article II eligibility clause question for Obama.”
He said his basis for such a statement is the opinion of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, who wrote in an 1821 case, Cohens vs. Virginia:
“It is most true that this court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.”
This isn’t a real grand jury.
To understand that you have to visit his about page (profile)!!
Then do the same with mine!!!
“I get the impression you and a couple others on here rarely actually read the articles. Just use mostly assumptions.”
If you’ve been following this topic for long you quickly figure out that most of the site pests are really only one person with different screen names. Not all, of course, but some are so obvious.
#33 - awesome post danamco. And so true. What is the function of the Judiciary? To uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. PERIOD. They must apply the laws of the Constitution to every single case they hear and make their judgements accordingly. This case is so simple. But as usual, the author of confusion is always Satan himself. That’s why I brush over what the trolls on this site always have to say. They post crap meant only to confuse topped off with sarcasm. Good rule of thumb - IGNORE. CO
It might not’ve been THE point; it was simply A point.