F-22 Necessary For Continued Dominance

The Bulletin ^ | November 23, 2009 | John Tsucalas

[Nowhere Man]

Here's a HUDshot of a C-130J flying radio/TV station.

[Yo-Yo]

That’s OK, buddy, I covered for you.

[Yo-Yo]

Looking at that HUD, I think it’s a bit too late to go around.

[PreciousLiberty]

“The “author” of this piece of crap article ought to take a look at some emissions and susceptibility data.”

Er, A.A., you’re talking the Top Secret emissions and susceptibility data? You’ve seen it, and are talking about it in a public forum?

I’m fairly sure you’re informed enough to know that “stealthy” doesn’t mean “invisible”, it means “greatly reduced detection and lock ranges”.

If we can shoot them before they can shoot (or any many cases even detect) us, we win.

“Unadulterated bull s***.”

I sure smell some.

[AccountabilityGov]

http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm?DocumentID=3557&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&appendURL=&Orderby

Another question: Why buy more F-22s when the AF can move into the future of Unmanned Aircrafts?

[myknowledge]

Please be warned: The CDI, or Center for Defense Information is a leftist 'defense think tank'.

The Generals and CDI