Skip to comments.Judge Carter, 3 sheets to the wind..
Posted on 01/01/2010 6:27:46 AM PST by USALiberty
Folks, I often wondered what possessed Judge Carter in California to tell the world he wanted to try this case on its merits and then do a sudden 180 by dismissing the case with prejudice? Does the word arrogance come to mind? Did the justice system in California just reach the bottom of the barrel? The performance of Judge Carter was totally disgusting to watch.. Oh, and this whoop-ti-do you heard from folks that Carter would do the right thing because he is an EX-Marine.. what happened? Did honor and his oath get flushed on the way to the bench?
I went back and read some of Carters words and was stunned by his lack of knowledge of the Constitution or even a basic understanding of what is really going on here.
(Excerpt) Read more at americangrandjury.org ...
Post #100 just showed me who you are. Thank you. CO
Judge Carter is an idiot. He must know that Obama does not qualify under Article II of the constitution. And he thinks
that George Bush woukld leave the country defenceless? Dubyah would be president again until a new election was held to replace our “designer” so called president. The romantic notion of a first “black” president blinded everyone, including Carter, who is not upholding the constitution as he is sworn to do. Carter is therefore impeachable.
IMHO, the country is defencelss with Obama in office.
I am. I'm doing my part, however insignificant, to keep conservatism from being co-opted by unhinged cranks peddling absurd conspiracies.
Oh yeah, and laughing at Orly and these "American Make-Believe Grand Jury" fools.
I hope you are right, however, the results from failed 60+ law suits makes me doubtful. I believe it has to come from the active military personnel colonels and below!!!
If the Soetoro’s gang are awake you will be inundated with their “answers”!!!
The tanned one is flipping!!!
WOW, I don't need to wait to do that, you have already earned your place in F.R. "Hall of Shame"!
My Father-in-law came here from Holland in 1947 and he had to give up his Dutch citizenship. My brother came here in 1950 and he had to give up his Danish citizenship!!
I came here in 1983 and have to relinquish my Swedish citizenship as well!!!
Now maybe you can understand that your have earned the FREEPER "Hall of Shame" title???
Barack Hussein Obama...hmmmm...hmmmm...hmmmm???
Just there there are eleven paid Soetoro brigade of distractions!!!
Amen and Amen!!!
He does that a lot doesn’t he?
KNOCK IT OFF!
Knock Off WHAT, please???
The personal attack posts, which I am now deleting.
Sorry, wrong post. My mistake.
The answer is no, I cannot. Indonesian law can no more supersede U.S. law than U.S. law can supersede Indonesian. If Obama did obtain Indonesian citizenship as a child that did not strip him of his U.S. citizenship. And if Indonesian law had forbidden dual citizenship then it would have been the Indonesian citizenship that was invalid. And nothing in their law could change that.
But I will point out that the Indonesian citizenship laws in effect at the time Obama lived there do not forbid dual citizenship and most likely would not have granted Obama citizenship even if he was formally adopted by Soetoro at the time. So your argument is flawed to begin with. Law on the Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia
That's right, because in order to become a naturalized citizen you are required to voluntarily give up your citizenship. Had your father-in-law or your brother been born here while on a visit to the U.S. then they would have acquired U.S. citizenship and there is nothing that Holland or Denmark could do to prevent it. Likewise, they no doubt would also have been citizens of Holland and Denmark, and there is nothing that the U.S. could do to prevent that. And said U.S. citizenship would continue until they were adults and they voluntarily gave it up.
In retrospect I think that this conversation between us should go into the F.R. "Hall of Shame" as evidence of crass Birther foolishness.
Well the judge did examine what Orly & Co. provided with their filings, and that wasn't much. But the judge isn't supposed to go on his own witch hunt and demand evidence.
Or maybe he's heard all the lame Birther arguments and decided that Obama does qualify under Article II? Ever think of that?