Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Halal meals come to homebound Muslims in Michigan - Halal Meals on Wheels
etaiwannews ^ | 2010-02-20

Posted on 02/19/2010 9:04:44 PM PST by JoeProBono

Social services groups in one of the largest U.S. Muslim communities now have started offering home-delivered meals made according to Islamic law. The Halal Meals on Wheels program _ the first in the country to work with a national halal food distributor _ comes after years of efforts by nonprofit agencies serving Detroit-area senior citizens and Muslim- and Arab-Americans....

(Excerpt) Read more at etaiwannews.com ...


TOPICS: Food; Religion
KEYWORDS: halal; jpb; mealsonwheels; michigan; muslims

1 posted on 02/19/2010 9:04:44 PM PST by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

2 posted on 02/19/2010 9:06:49 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Gotta be in Dearbornistan.

The Muslimes (through lawsuits) actually got a downriver city (of Detroit) to broadcast those caterwauling / screaming prayer calls throughout the day. They argued that if Christian church bells ringing is permitted, their prayer calls should be blared throughout the city.

3 posted on 02/19/2010 9:10:17 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Do they use their left hand while preparing the food?


4 posted on 02/19/2010 9:10:40 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Halal Meals on Wheels - Now with extra PETN!

“That’s explosives, boy!” /Foghorn_Leghorn


5 posted on 02/19/2010 9:12:58 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Pork chops?


6 posted on 02/19/2010 9:18:51 PM PST by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013 The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man; cajuncow

7 posted on 02/19/2010 9:28:50 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
The argued that if Christian church bells ringing is permitted, their prayer calls should be blared throughout the city

Assuming that the prayer calls are of the same decibel level as the church bells, on what basis would you prohibit them?

8 posted on 02/19/2010 9:29:49 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Nice. Can’t decide if a horn that squeals or one that sounds out “allah akbar” would be better.


9 posted on 02/19/2010 9:32:41 PM PST by cajuncow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814
Church bells are not spoken words. They are merely a string of tones using seven notes, and sharps or flats thereof. Prayer calls are spoken / or "chanted" as the case may be.

Islamic prayer calls (through a PA system of amplified loudspeakers) are screaching out spoken words, words proclaiming "Allah as the only one" "Islam is the light"; etc. De-facto promotion of Islam throughout audible city-wide prayer calls via loudspeakers is not the same as church bells.

10 posted on 02/19/2010 9:44:32 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian

While not identical, it’s certainly arguable that the two (bells & calls) are comparable expressions of religion; thus the ruling.


11 posted on 02/19/2010 9:55:00 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
any relations to Shallow Hal?
12 posted on 02/19/2010 9:58:57 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Something’s not kosher here......


13 posted on 02/19/2010 10:02:12 PM PST by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
And for those preferring haraam meals...

14 posted on 02/19/2010 10:02:57 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (In God I trust, all others cite your source.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

15 posted on 02/19/2010 10:10:11 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican

16 posted on 02/19/2010 10:11:58 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814
Wow. Musical bells = human speech? Human speech is not remotely close to the sound of bells; but hey, that's just me.

We're on two vastly different wavelengths. You're not going to persuade me with your bizarre fallacy. You keep your opinion, I'll keep mine.

Frankly, I'd prefer to listen to occasional bells over the wailing / caterwauling diatribe about Allah through prayer calls on city-wide loudspeakers.

17 posted on 02/19/2010 10:12:23 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian; GL of Sector 2814

CHURCH BELLS


18 posted on 02/19/2010 10:19:00 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
Frankly, I'd prefer to listen to occasional bells over the wailing / caterwauling diatribe about Allah through prayer calls on city-wide loudspeakers.

I find the sounds of occasional bells more pleasing than occasional calls to prayer myself (and I'm neither Christian nor Muslim) but I recognize that they're both protected forms of religious expression.

Darn that pesky 1st Amendment!

19 posted on 02/19/2010 10:25:10 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814
Like I said, we're just on two separate wavelengths...

and I happen to champion the First Amendment.

20 posted on 02/19/2010 10:29:48 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
and I happen to champion the First Amendment.

And yet you're calling for the banning of a call to prayer...

21 posted on 02/19/2010 10:34:51 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

It’s not akin to aural bell sounds! It’s human speech broadcast over loudspeakers throughout a municipality.

With your logic, every religious denomination (or any group/organiztion) would be permitted and entitled to place permanent public address loudspeakers in the city to broadcast various protestant, Jewish, Catholic, Buddhist, Sikh, etc. prayers, sermons, chants (ALL SPOKEN WORDS-not bells) on a daily basis.

It would be a fever-pitch cacaphony of competing loudspeakers of who could outdo the other. It would be a matter of disturbing the peace. By the city permitting the SPOKEN WORDS of prayer call, it’s a de-facto promotion and endorsement of religion, no longer a First Amendment matter.

I’m fine with prayer calls of HUMAN SPEECH confined to their realm / Mosque - never said I was against that.


22 posted on 02/19/2010 10:45:29 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I would rather see KFC franchises also going Kosher so you would have a choice in how you would like your chicken. I bet most Christians would enjoy Kosher chicken better.


23 posted on 02/19/2010 10:46:28 PM PST by Munson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Munson

24 posted on 02/19/2010 10:49:23 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
It would be a fever-pitch cacaphony of competing loudspeakers of who could outdo the other. It would be a matter of disturbing the peace. By the city permitting the SPOKEN WORDS of prayer call, it’s a de-facto promotion and endorsement of religion, no longer a First Amendment matter.

If the calls to prayer are of the same (approximate) duration and decibel level as the bells, it's not "fever-pitch cacaphony".

25 posted on 02/19/2010 10:53:36 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

It would be “fever-pitch cacaphony,” per your logic of allowing anyone and every religious denomination a loudspeaker to proselytize because it’s protected by the First Amendment. ...and a de-facto promotion of religion by the municipality by way of SPOKEN WORDS through the loudspeakers.

Every club, church, civic organization, etc. would be permitted and entitled to have a loudspeaker and blare it throughout the day. Good times.


26 posted on 02/19/2010 11:01:07 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
Every club, church, civic organization, etc. would be permitted and entitled to have a loudspeaker and blare it throughout the day.

Did you miss the part where I predicated my approval upon the duration of the calls being the same as that of the bells?

27 posted on 02/19/2010 11:03:34 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

But they could all be simultaneous or in unison. Duration, equal or not, does not negate the fact that one is HUMAN SPEECH, the other, a blend of SEVEN MUSICAL NOTES.

And if one religious practice disctates a longer duration, what if others seek parity in time by broadcasting even more prayer / proselytizong over their respective loudspeakers?

It’s just not that hard to discern between bells and human speech. Bells just do not equal human speech.


28 posted on 02/19/2010 11:09:36 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
But they could all be simultaneous or in unison. Duration, equal or not, does not negate the fact that one is HUMAN SPEECH, the other, a blend of SEVEN MUSICAL NOTES. Bells just do not equal human speech.

There's no need to yell.

I understand that they're not identical, and yet they both manage to fit into the category of "religious expression".

I suspect your argument might have something to do with your view of Islam in general; I base this on your descriptions of the calls to prayer in this thread: "caterwauling / screaming", "screaching out spoken words", "wailing / caterwauling diatribe", etc. If I'm mistaken, I apologize in advance for the mischaracterization.

Enough for now, have to get to bed; I have to get up for work in 7 hours!

29 posted on 02/19/2010 11:27:19 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
The Muslimes (through lawsuits) actually got a downriver city (of Detroit) to broadcast those caterwauling / screaming prayer calls throughout the day. They argued that if Christian church bells ringing is permitted, their prayer calls should be blared throughout the city.

Ugh! One of my Top Ten reasons I love to be home is that I don't have to hear that sound.

30 posted on 02/19/2010 11:32:50 PM PST by Allegra (It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

Animal sacrifice fits into the realm of “religious expression” too. BTW, have you ever heard the prayer calls five times a day? I think to say they saound like caterwauling is a kind characterization.

I’m starting the tax-exempt Church of the SDWS (Steely Dan Worship Society). We will broadcast, via loudspeaker across the municiplaities, routine play of the following tracks, to praise the inimitable Donald Fagen:

1. Babylon Sisters
2. Hey Nineteen
3. Black Cow
4. Gaucho


31 posted on 02/19/2010 11:36:55 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

It’s an abysmal sound of the worst order.

It’s slowly entrenching itself into American cities, too.


32 posted on 02/19/2010 11:41:28 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

Church bells chime the Westminister tone on the hour, it is a clock and nothing more.


33 posted on 02/20/2010 12:20:28 AM PST by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
Animal sacrifice fits into the realm of “religious expression” too.

And it's perfectly legal in the United States under some circumstances.

BTW, have you ever heard the prayer calls five times a day? I think to say they saound like caterwauling is a kind characterization.

Never have; there aren't a lot of mosques in the mountains west of Denver...

I’m starting the tax-exempt Church of the SDWS (Steely Dan Worship Society). We will broadcast, via loudspeaker across the municiplaities, routine play of the following tracks, to praise the inimitable Donald Fagen:

1. Babylon Sisters
2. Hey Nineteen
3. Black Cow
4. Gaucho

I see your SDWS and raise you the HWS (Heart Worship Society), praising Ann and Nancy Wilson with following:

1. Magic Man
2. Dreamboat Annie
3. Crazy on You
4. Barracuda

We are a bit nondenominational at times, and will play Pat Benatar as well...

34 posted on 02/20/2010 6:19:38 AM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mengerian
"Wow. Musical bells = human speech? Human speech is not remotely close to the sound of bells; but hey, that's just me."

I would say this; the sound of the bells is their natural sound, whereas the sound of "amplified" voices is NOT the natural sound, it is amplified.

Therefore my conclusion would be, let the mussies catterwal all they want, just in their natural voices, NO AMPLIFICATION. And then the bells would be rung in their "natural voicing", no amplification.

America is NOT a muslim country, no matter what our kenyan president says; we are a Christian nation. And, anyone who is neither muslim nor Christian should not have any opinion about it...it doesn't concern them.

Try going to Iran and demanding that Christian church bells be rung...and they will be ringing at your headless funeral.

This ruling has ACLU written all over it...the most un-American institution ever devised.

35 posted on 02/20/2010 7:08:51 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
America is NOT a muslim country, no matter what our kenyan president says; we are a Christian nation.

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion… The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation." - Treaty of Tripoli (1797), approved of unanimously by the U.S. Senate under George Washington’s presidency, signed into law the next year by President John Adams.

36 posted on 02/20/2010 7:37:12 AM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814; Admin Moderator
Buzz off troll...go back to DU with your atheist friends.


37 posted on 02/20/2010 8:08:22 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Buzz off troll...go back to DU with your atheist friends.

Well, I suppose it's easier to say that than to actually address my point.

BTW, what's wrong with being an atheist? Are you offended by people who don't share your faith?

38 posted on 02/20/2010 9:18:22 AM PST by GL of Sector 2814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson