Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; agrace; AliVeritas; AlmaKing; AngieGal; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

16 posted on 02/24/2010 9:35:37 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

There have been a lot of people on these threads trying to say “it probably didn’t happen the way the lawsuit says” or “these kids have no rights anyway”. Based on this article and my own knowledge of the field (M.S. in Computer Science) I will say right now that the charges in the lawsuit are correct, the school district has been spying on students in and outside of school. They may or may not have done this only for theft prevention purposes but this is NOT power that a school administrator should have.

Especially notice the bit in the story about the admin bragging about sending cops to hunt down a stolen laptop, and how they went to the wrong house because the real perps were stealing wireless. First off, how would you like to be the innocent people? Second, if the school sent the cops to the wrong address it means they were using more than just the camera to track the laptop. Just the camera would have sent them to the right place. They were actively figuring out what network the computer was on and WHO OWNED THAT NETWORK. Anyone see issues with that? It’s a good thing in that case that they did use the camera too or I bet the cops would have arrested the innocent homeowners. After all, the school apparently had enough evidence to get cops out there (and we’ll assume a warrant but who knows...)

This is VERY VERY disturbing, people!


30 posted on 02/24/2010 11:00:36 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
•Possession of a monitored Macbook was required for classes

•Possession of an unmonitored personal computer was forbidden and would be confiscated

Wow. So, I guess saying the students weren't "allowed" to use other computers was the right way to put it.

52 posted on 02/24/2010 9:19:02 PM PST by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson