Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: goldi
She later added that, in more than a decade as assistant vice principal, she had "never disciplined a student" for actions beyond school property that had no connection to a school-related event, apparently in response to the Robbins lawsuit's allegation the student learned of the webcam surveillance from a school disciplinary action.

I wondered how long it would take for that to happen.

Since it's he said/she said, she can safely deny it and then demand proof that she's lying, knowing that no hard copies exist, or have been destroyed.

However, if nothing else, this did bring to light the fact that these computers had capabilities not honestly disclosed to the students and their families.

48 posted on 02/24/2010 5:38:15 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

“However, if nothing else, this did bring to light the fact that these computers had capabilities not honestly disclosed to the students and their families.”

That’s where the school district made their big mistake, hopefully out of ignorance, not malice. Perhaps the principal was unknowingly duped, made a scapegoat by someone (the kid and his parents, the IT Department, someone else?). What a career killer. No matter. The cat’s out of the bag. The computers are compromised, the school’s reputation is in tatters.

That IT department or whatever they call themselves — they’re something else. The FBI will straighten it all out.


50 posted on 02/24/2010 5:59:00 PM PST by goldi (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson