Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Update on Obama's Photoshopped Fake Background History Pictures
Official Obama Pictures, with analysis

Posted on 02/24/2010 3:59:44 PM PST by capacommie

Premise:  ANY fakery in these official Camp-Obama-provided photographs means 100% faked. 

Why would Camp Obama fake photos of Obama's family and educational history?  Why, because

the story that has been fed to gullible Americans, is fake!  Exquisitely detailed analytics have been

done, but use your common sense too. 

 

The Fake African Family

BHO's head doesn't match his neck which has a notch in it.  A notched neck.  Right there, this picture is

FAKE.   This is an official Camp Obama picture, and the fact that they faked ONE thing on even ONE picture,

means that NONE of his pictures have any veracity.  But there's more...

2nd guy from right has 2 different sleeves or his right arm got shriveled

guy on far right has 2 different pant legs, 2 different shoes, plus

extra joint in his left forearm, 3" extra long ulna/radius, 2 skin tones for hands

Camp Obama often used hands on shoulders as patches, but they screw up hands badly

Shadows wrong

Center couple looks misplaced.

 

The Fake Grandparents-Dunham

Grandpa Duhnam has diverged arm, left hand is mutilated, used same deformity fingers as right hand-mishmash hand

bench tilted more than concrete fence behind it, not parallel

background wrong, BHO wearing wedding ring while ostensibly at columbia (pre michelle) they forgot to erase it

no big knotty groomed trees behind bench

 

this one is more like it....

 

Here is the bench along 5th Avenue, NYC, no tree

 

here, now there's a tree behind the bench, and lots of other abnormalities

 

here's the groomed trees, off to the side...see the knotty one? 

 

alt

too dark lobster claw right deformed hand, picture put on top of projection, girl behind bho's hand is washed out but rest aren't, nobody looking at bho "on stage"

this appears to be the part of the punahau commencement where the girls are singing, which they do every year

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JTJtAB2Wls&feature=related

 

The Fake Obama Senior with Leis Picture

bho sr's head stuck on someone else's using leis to sew on the neck, really laughable photoshopping

 

The Fake Group Photo

another macrocephalic photoshopping

 

The Fake Basketball Photo

look at his left hand which is photo-amputated

right hand with the magic-marker black streak

macrocephalic photoshopping

 

Close-Up Analysis of Photoshop Hand Deformities

 

Look at the hands and wrist. They are not natural. 

These show the shadow detail under Barack's neck. The first is a standard enlargement,

while the second shows pixelation. The red outlines show the questionable areas.

The Marie Antoinette Photoshop Plastic Surgery...

Close-Up of Hand and Wrist Deformities, Poor Blending

 

The Body-Snatcher Basketball Photoshop

Photobucket

floating white hand on shoulder

turtle-stuck on head on to body of poor #25--the other black guy

 

More Punahau Body-Snatcher Basketball Photoshops

Photobucket

So they stuck bho's cranium on to #25, or #21, and there wasn't a #23. 

 

The Real Punahau Shot

This was the real one...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or was it this one?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Fake Dunham Photoshop Picture

Macrocephalic stanley ann, with adult sized head,

Stanley in wrong uniform

Shadowing is incorrect

 

Fake Kansas Military Picture

alt

Stanley wearing marine hat, marine belt, but he was in the Army,

Stanley has rows of beestings on his cheeks

Stanley and Madelyn stand straight, but the house is crooked.

 

 

The Fake Uncle Payne Obama Photoshop Picture

Photobucket

From AP:  BO has 1' arm and now microcephalic head (the headhunters got to him and shrunk his cranium!)

This is "uncle payne" (the guy sent in to mop up obama's claim about auschwitz).

 

 

 

More Fraud:  The 6" Hockey-Stick Scalp Scar With No Explanation on Medical Report



I have looked all over and there is no mention anywhere of where this 6", hockey-stick shaped scar came from.
Maybe he had his conscience surgically removed, or a teleprompter inserted.  "Complete medical disclosure, eh?"

 

The Fake Harvard Baton Photoshop Picture

Notice his "straight from the ground" arm. He must have some of Stretch Armstrong's DNA.

The camera recognizes the messiah in him and makes him crisper than anyone else in the photo.

Hand too dark/small.

 

Awfully-Bad Obama-in-Africa Photoshop Picture

Ummmmmm, no.  Just, no. Just, so, no.

 

 

Questionable Obama-Granny Shot from Kenya

Her arm looks disconnected, reconnected. 

Notice, in every Kenya shot he's wearing khakis and a red polo shirt?

 


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bho44; crime; dsj; eligibility; fakedidentity; fakeobamaphotos; formom; fraud; hoax; ineligibility; lies; obamafamily; photoshop; progressives; usurper; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-168 next last
To: wideminded

The image is a compilation image, pieced together from different shots.


101 posted on 02/24/2010 10:23:31 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: capacommie
IMHO your "analyses" of these photos do not add up and you are seeing things that aren't there. In some cases you are reading things into the normal pixellation in a digital photograph. Of course it's possible also that you yourself do not believe what you are presenting here.

The photo with the leis has been presented before on FR and even people here who have extensively researched the tiniest details of Obama's life were not sure when it was taken. The implication of your post is that Obama has put out all these fake photos. I do not see any purpose in putting out a fake "mystery photo" with no story behind it.

As for your claim that the Kenyan family photo is a compilation, it is clear that is is just a regular photo and no one is claiming that Obama did not visit Kenya and meet with all these relatives, so there is no reason they could not have gathered for a family photo; indeed, they had every reason to do so.

None of these photos are faked and George H. W. Bush is not the son of Nikola Tesla's assistant either.

102 posted on 02/25/2010 1:22:50 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: capacommie
You are relying on copies of copies. This is a very, very bad copy. There are all sorts of artifacts that are introduced simply by this alone. All of the pixel weirdness is produced by this, not by Photoshop.

Also, you can't even say that the color of one right pantleg is purple. That color also matches someone else's skin on his neck and it also matches the shadowed area of the other pant leg.

The former claim that this guy was wearing two different shoes is also bogus. You see decorations on the inside of the right shoe, but you can't see anything on the outside of the left shoe. Big deal. There's no universal law in shoe manufacturing that outside decorations have to match inside decorations. And for that matter, you can't see the inside part of the left shoe anyway.

As far as Barry's right hand is concerned, a photo is a thin slice of time. If he was moving his thumb as the guy took the picture, you could get something like this. Remember Election with Reese Witherspoon and how the camera was able to freeze-frame certain really, really awkward, dorky, stupid looking expressions that were simply part of normal movement but which are not noticed because they go by so quickly? There is nothing in Barry's hand position that is anything more extreme or unusual than that.

As for the claim that the guy with the donkey shirt has either two different sleeves or a withered arm. Sheesh, that side of his body is in shadow next to the other guy. And you see only a portion of his arm hanging down because it's behind the woman in front of him. The thin width that you see isn't the only portion of his arm that exists.

As far as the claim that the donkey shirt guy is "wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means," do you really mean to put yourself into such a position? Since he is standing BEHIND everyone, the darkness of his clothing cannot hide anything of anyone else. And if this was a composite photo of preexisting photos, then how did he choose anything to "intend" what the creator of the supposed composite photo wanted to accomplish at a date later than when the original photographs were taken?
103 posted on 02/25/2010 4:46:37 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

the one photo that there is no doubt that has a problem is the floating hand on the park bench with his grandparents. I would like to see the original story with this picture to see if it looks the same.


104 posted on 02/25/2010 5:37:19 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

his head looks big in that photo. One of the big things used in the photo analysis has been the size of his head..for example, the one where lolo and ann are sitting on the couch.

It may be that he had some kind of disorder and thus the need for head surgery/possible shunt. One person said it looked like he has a shunt. I did find a photo that looked like it to me except I dont know what a shunt looks like..but there was a definite bulge behind his ear area.


105 posted on 02/25/2010 5:40:22 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

You have referenced the wrong photo and post. My comment related to post #72 and the woman is white.


106 posted on 02/25/2010 5:44:33 AM PST by Natural Born 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

It appears to me that the lighting on the head is inconsistent with the other subjects. Although the entire group receives mottled lighting — they may be in the partial shadowing of a tree — the consistent lighting is from the subjects’ right.

BO’s lighting is from above, not the right. The guy to Barry’s right also has NO highlights; weird. Other than the women at Barry’s feet (?) nobody is smiling. I guess that is what makes people happy.


107 posted on 02/25/2010 6:08:45 AM PST by Loud Mime (Liberalism is a Socialist Disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54
Look at the woman second from left, front row. What the heck is with her neck and head? Looks really unnatural like the face is in the wrong place. If not, that’s one strange looking gal.

Sorry about the mixup. That woman has a long neck combined with terrible posture, but there are lots of other people who hold their neck like that like that.

From an article on the spy Robert Hanssen:
"But while his superiors were excited about his technical skills, they were put off by his awkwardness in social settings, his indifference to his wardrobe, his slouching posture. A tall man, he always seemed to be hunched over, his head perched on his neck at an odd, birdlike angle, colleagues said." - link

108 posted on 02/25/2010 10:07:35 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

I had a close look at her in an image program after enlarging the photo. Bad posture I agree but that does not account for her neck and head position. It is unnatural. The neck is straight with no twisting to accommodate where her face is relative to the rest of her. That aside, the implied length of her neck would make her giraffe-woman when she faces forward and stops hunching. I don’t know why altering that woman had anything to do with the overall agenda of the photo, but I think she’s not what was there in the original.


109 posted on 02/25/2010 10:33:02 AM PST by Natural Born 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
the one photo that there is no doubt that has a problem is the floating hand on the park bench with his grandparents. I would like to see the original story with this picture to see if it looks the same.

There is no "floating hand." Look at his grandfather's right hand and compare it to his grandfather's left hand on his shoulder. They're obviously the left and right hand of the same old man.
110 posted on 02/25/2010 8:18:00 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: tutstar; EnderWiggins; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Update on Obama's Photoshopped Fake Background History Pictures

Interesting photos and comments throughout this thread.

[Thanks, tutstar.]

111 posted on 03/01/2010 5:18:48 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

LOL - Perfect tie-in with the hockey stick! Unfortunate similarities sometimes make for good humor! :)


112 posted on 03/01/2010 8:29:05 PM PST by LibertyRocks (Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

lol


113 posted on 03/01/2010 8:58:01 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

These pictures are on the internet....it must be true!


114 posted on 03/02/2010 8:43:00 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

115 posted on 03/02/2010 8:55:54 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

bump


116 posted on 12/31/2010 4:08:41 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

Take a look at the mortar joints in the blocks behind his Granny. How’d those joints move over when BO is between them?


117 posted on 03/29/2011 9:22:44 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capacommie; DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; paulycy; Roscoe Karns; JoeProBono; 50mm
Ping to the BEST photoshoppers on FR. This is epic/fun stuff!


118 posted on 03/29/2011 9:41:48 PM PDT by Daffynition (DBKP ~ Death By 1000 Papercuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
So, we still don’t know who he is.

I have a good guess.


119 posted on 03/29/2011 10:09:05 PM PDT by Salamander (I think I need some rest......but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

120 posted on 03/29/2011 10:13:56 PM PDT by Salamander (I think I need some rest......but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

There is a dark line that goes up the back of the lady in sandals (second lady from left). Looks cropped.


121 posted on 03/29/2011 10:23:20 PM PDT by Guardian Sebastian (All I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

Also a dark line that goes up the lady’s right arm. Lady with dark dress in center. Also looks cropped.


122 posted on 03/29/2011 10:26:21 PM PDT by Guardian Sebastian (All I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

re: his birthplace. one site they haven’t scrubbed of the Queen’s reference.

http://genealogy.about.com/od/aframertrees/p/barack_obama.htm


123 posted on 03/29/2011 10:42:30 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

the gramps, toot, and barry in central park photo was from Obama For America via Time Magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1834628_1754223,00.html


124 posted on 03/29/2011 10:49:15 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

LOL...*You’ve broken my mind*....that is sooooooo perfect!


125 posted on 03/29/2011 10:53:51 PM PDT by Daffynition (DBKP ~ Death By 1000 Papercuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I have some Zap-A-Gap right here.

Lean over a bit and I’ll glue it back together.

:)


126 posted on 03/30/2011 12:05:19 AM PDT by Salamander (I think I need some rest......but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Freaky: *Pull My Daisy*


127 posted on 03/30/2011 12:37:25 AM PDT by Daffynition (DBKP ~ Death By 1000 Papercuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I don’t even wanna know what that means.

;-D


128 posted on 03/30/2011 1:20:22 AM PDT by Salamander (I think I need some rest......but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition


129 posted on 03/30/2011 1:54:55 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: capacommie; Daffynition

130 posted on 03/30/2011 2:34:41 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

http://www.freerepublic.com/~capacommie/


131 posted on 03/30/2011 2:43:22 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Got the zzzzzzzooooooooooottttttttttttt did he?

Then he missed this great archive photo of when Barry sang for Gladys Knight as one of the Pips...


132 posted on 03/30/2011 3:07:51 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdN27HzoyO4


133 posted on 03/30/2011 3:28:38 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

That’s funny. Reminds me of happier days, before karaoke bars.


134 posted on 03/30/2011 4:07:00 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
You are relying on copies of copies. This is a very, very bad copy. There are all sorts of artifacts that are introduced simply by this alone.

Given when these photos were taken, they were actual photos that were scanned. The scanning will distort a picture, and the further in the past they were scanned, the worse it would be.

135 posted on 03/30/2011 4:26:03 AM PDT by IamConservative (Liberalism - the surety of knowing that which cannot be proven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: capacommie; aruanan

You were wrong the first time you posted this (about a year ago?) and you are wrong now. Quit spreading lies.


136 posted on 03/30/2011 4:29:21 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: arasina
You were wrong the first time you posted this (about a year ago?) and you are wrong now. Quit spreading lies.

Geez. At first I thought you were telling me I was spreading lies. There's nothing wrong or weird or photoshopped about these pictures.

But on looking back through previous posts, I see I had responded to you about some other photo (the one with Barry and his grandparents) someone claimed was faked. I'll respond to these other pictures with the following since it applies equally well to the photos referenced above:
Things happen like this in photos that the photographer may not be aware of at the time--there may be a tree or light pole in the background that will later appear to be growing up out of someone's head or one of the people in the photo is starting to turn his head and, as often happens, his eyes briefly close or someone in the background is flipping him off.

If the photo had been snapped a second or so earlier when the hand was obscured behind Barry's back, it would be claimed that it was a missing hand. "See? You can see by the angle of the grandfather's arm that his hand should be visible resting on Barry's shoulder. But it's not there! It's not there because it's a faked photo!" The question is why, in an otherwise skillfully done fake, the hand was left floating to attract attention. "Well, it's because they're leaving us a clue!" Uh huh. You know, stuff like that.

I'm sure if there was nothing at all in the photo he could "detect" in this way, he would claim that the alteration of the photo had been done so perfectly that it left no traces. This type of person does to photos what cultists do to Bible passages: they

>claim to see things that aren't there,
>claim that what they should have seen used to be there but was removed for nefarious reasons,
>claim that a portion of what is there (the part that messes with their interpretation) was later added or altered, or
>give unusual interpretations of what is there.

And--gee--they all happen to reinforce that cultist's position that otherwise would be undermined by a plain reading (or viewing in this case) of the passage in question.

137 posted on 03/30/2011 5:34:23 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: capacommie; arasina
Rarely have I seen a larger set of delusions than you have posted here. You've outdone yourself.


138 posted on 03/30/2011 5:58:27 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capacommie; arasina
Exquisitely detailed analytics have been done, but use your common sense too.

There are no exquisitely detailed "analytics" that have been performed on these photos in this thread other than to show your contentions to be without merit.
139 posted on 03/30/2011 6:04:04 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

The question that does arise is why haven’t any of these people from his elementary and high school years come out with stories about Obama. We have never heard anyone come out and say he was a good friend, or a good team mate or a good student (after all he has been called the smartest President ever)? Apparently through these photos, he has been in company of a lot of people, but why are they all so silent? You would think they would have so many things to say about the Leader of the Free World.


140 posted on 03/30/2011 8:47:59 AM PDT by jerseyrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

Very interesting.


141 posted on 03/30/2011 10:33:42 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Thanks for the ping!


142 posted on 03/30/2011 10:34:13 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: sten

save for later


143 posted on 03/30/2011 1:30:19 PM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; arasina; Natural Born 54; PhilDragoo; LucyT
Maybe it would help if I explained HOW that Central Park sequence came about?

I saw the original image, supposedly taken sometime in 1980 - "when the Dunhams came to visit zero..." in New York. It looked odd to me. Zero looked, IMO, as if he had been inserted between Stanley Armour and Madelyn.

It was the placement and posture of Stanley Armour and Madelyn that alerted me...zero is 'fitted' between them both like a piece of jig-saw puzzle. I then asked Freeper PhilDragoo to REMOVE ZERO. And presto - now the elderly couple are back in the position they were in originally.

And Phil added a touch of humour, he placed zero BEHIND the wall.

Meanwhile I had found an image of zero SITTING ON HIS OWN on a wall in Central Park, WEARING THE SAME CLOTHES.

Which might suggest that a POSE to suit the position he is shown in - with Stanley Armour and Madelyn on the bench was CREATED for the purpose...to allow him to be INSERTED.

NOW LOOK AGAIN AT THE WALL!

While we look at the PEOPLE - we miss something very important. HAVE YOU EVER SEEN ANYTHING SO SHODDY?

There are a number of benches along that wall, the above is just ONE of them...

IT SEEMS OBVIOUS TO ME THE IMAGE IS A TOTAL FAKE. ALTHOUGH FEATURED IN A COLLECTION OF IMAGES BY TIME MAGAZINE...(at least they DIDN'T CROP THE WALL!) Most images are CROPPED...and for good reason.

TIME MAGAZINE SOURCE

144 posted on 03/30/2011 8:13:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thanks FN.


145 posted on 03/30/2011 8:35:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000
What was he doing in Pakistan in 1981, and on what citizenship basis.

Where are his early girlfriends. Frank Marshall Davis from age 9 through 18. Bill Ayer's wife Bernadette Dohrn connected Michelle and Obama at Dohrn's law firm, a loveless, sexless power partnership in the manner of Hillary Rodham and William Jefferson Clinton.

Is he truly DNA-linked to the very black, very absent Barak Sr. or is he the seed of Frank Marshall Davis (see the pictures of Commie Mommie in the Windy City apartment) or even of Malcolm Little aka Malcolm X.

No certificate, sanitized passport file—John Brennan's Analysis Corp. employed the subcontractor who did that work, and Brennan was first choice for Director of Central Intelligence and is National Security Advisor, another who cannot say Islamist and terrorist in the same sentence.

Who is the Islamo-Communist stooge occasionally in the Oval Office when not on the golf course or basketball court.


146 posted on 03/31/2011 1:05:34 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; LucyT

THE ONE THING I AM SURE OF IS THAT FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS WASN'T HIS FATHER...AND FRANKS' SON, MARK IS THE SPITTING IMAGE OF THE CHINLESS WONDER NAMED FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS.

147 posted on 03/31/2011 2:13:54 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

There’s another discrepancy in the photo that includes 0 that I just noticed this morning and which I don’t think I have ever seen mentioned before. Just between 0’s and Stanley’s shoulders there is a small triangle that is part of the wall. It is blue and it should be black as it is in Phil’s reconstruction. It is not part of Stanley’s suit because the edge of his sleeve is easily defined and not wrinkled. It is not his extended arm because to do that would have caused his shoulder to be lifted and probably a some kind of wrinkles in the shoulder area and there are none. Also if his arm were extended to somehow meet up with that hand on 0’s shoulder that triangle would not even be visible. And if 0 were actually sitting there that little triangle would not only be black because that is what color the wall is but it would also be black because of 0’s shadow.


148 posted on 03/31/2011 9:22:15 AM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

0 didn’t have a roommate when he went to high school. He lived in his grandma’s apartment.


149 posted on 03/31/2011 9:36:26 AM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All

b


150 posted on 03/31/2011 9:39:08 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson