Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus Issues Statement on University of Alabama-Huntsville Shooting
PR Newswire ^ | Feb. 15, 2010

Posted on 02/28/2010 6:04:46 PM PST by greatdefender

CROTON FALLS, N.Y., Feb. 15 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Amy Bishop, a mother of four and a Harvard-educated biologist, used a handgun to fatally shoot three fellow biology professors and injure three others during a departmental staff meeting on the University of Alabama-Huntsville campus on Feb. 12. Bishop, the alleged shooter, was upset that she had been denied tenure by the university. No students were involved in the shooting.

In response Andy Pelosi, the Director of the Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus, issued the following statement:

"We offer our condolences to the families of the victims and the entire University of Alabama-Huntsville community.

"This tragic incident shows once again that an angry individual with access to a deadly handgun can commit mass murder wherever people gather, in workplaces, shopping malls, churches, schools and yes, universities. This random and horrific attack also demonstrates the futility and irresponsibility of trying to force loaded and concealed handguns onto college campuses as the solution to prevent mass shootings and gun violence. Such a radical policy would risk the safety and security of every faculty member and student on campus on literally a continual basis.

"The gun lobby's predictable response to this rampage killing is to arm students and professors, believing in a mistaken 'wild west' fantasy where carrying loaded handguns results in killing armed perpetrators. Nothing could be further from the truth. The gun lobby conveniently ignores incidents such as in Lakewood, Washington where on Nov. 29, 2009, a gunman massacred four police officers inside a coffee shop even though the officers had loaded handguns on their hips. But the officers were still surprised and overwhelmed by the attacker, Maurice Clemmons. Why does anyone think that untrained students or professors would be better able to stop a rampage shooting than trained security officers?

"The Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus calls on lawmakers in states with pending 'guns on campus' bills to immediately withdraw such irresponsible and dangerous legislation.

"In addition, the Campaign is urging colleges and universities to band together to oppose the gun lobby's agenda to force guns on college campuses. To date, more than 120 colleges and universities in 30 states, including the University of Alabama-Huntsville, have joined the campaign.

(See list: http://preview.tinyurl.com/Guns-Off-Campus-List-Schools).

"While school shootings such as the recent attack in Alabama receive a great deal of national attention, such incidents are extremely rare. The fact is that America's educational institutions are among the safest environments for students, faculty, and staff. Much safer than the communities that surround them. A Dept. of Justice study found that 93 percent of violence against students occurs off campus. This is due to the fact that nearly all colleges and universities have policies that prohibit firearms on campus."

SOURCE Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Education; Society
KEYWORDS: antigun; armedcitizen; banglist; campuscarry; democrats; gunfreezone; liberalfascism; obama; obamasupporter; obamavoter; rkba; uah
They disregard the fact that Dr. Bishop had incidents that were clear that she had shown dangers. But, like any anti-gun groups, they rather see worthless laws passed that strip people's right to have firearms while leaving criminals roam free in the streets.
1 posted on 02/28/2010 6:04:46 PM PST by greatdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

2 posted on 02/28/2010 6:08:49 PM PST by GregoTX (When people find they can vote themselves money it will herald the end of the republic. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

They also forgot that Bishop was ALREADY breaking the law having the gun at school. The law really worked well keeping her from carrying didn’t it?


3 posted on 02/28/2010 6:08:54 PM PST by Kent1957
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"A family source said Bishop, a mother of four children - the youngest a third-grade boy - was a far-left political extremist who was "obsessed" with President Obama to the point of being off-putting."--Boston Herald, February 15, 2010

'Oddball' portrait of Amy Bishop emerges:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100215oddball_protrait_emerges_suspects_family_pals_offer_clues/srvc=home&position=0
___________________________________________________

"The woman accused of killing three colleagues at the University of Alabama in Huntsville was a suspect in a 1993 attempted mail bombing, according to a report by The Boston Globe.

The report broke the day after it was learned that Bishop fatally shot her brother in Braintree in 1986.

More than fifteen years ago, Bishop worked with Sylvia Fluckiger at Children's Hospital in Boston.

"I thought she was an odd-ball. Maybe socially a little awkward," Fluckiger said.  "I felt she was a little bit sloppy working in the lab. But we were not friends. She came to do her experiments in our lab. I had my stuff to be done. We didn't hang out."

In 1993, Bishop and her husband, James Anderson, were reportedly questioned about a mail bomb that was sent to the Newton home of Harvard Medical School professor Dr. Paul Rosenberg.

Colleagues at Children's Hospital were suspicious at the time, because Bishop was apparently angry at Dr. Rosenberg, although no one knew why.

http://www.necn.com/02/14/10/Amy-Bishop-at-time-of-1993-mail-bomb-inv/landing.html?blockID=180453&feedID=4215

4 posted on 02/28/2010 6:10:15 PM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

The writer conveniently leaves out the fact that at least one of the police officers in the Maurice Clemmons shooting did manage to return fire and at least wound him.

So should we all stop wearing seatbelts because if we happen drive off a cliff and the car explodes, the seatbelt won’t save us?


5 posted on 02/28/2010 6:11:26 PM PST by smokingfrog (You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX

Sad but true...the bad people don’t follow the rules....It will only keep guns out of the hands of regular folks....Maybe some of these shootings wouldn’t be Multiple Shootings if other Faculty or Students were armed...


6 posted on 02/28/2010 6:15:41 PM PST by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957
"They also forgot that Bishop was ALREADY breaking the law having the gun at school."

I think - and someone can certainly correct me if I'm off base here - that she was breaking the law when she decided to MURDER four people, including her brother some 25 years ago.

I can see how the left thinks that a prohibition against guns would be effective when a prohibition against murder, doesn't seem to be. /s

7 posted on 02/28/2010 6:16:01 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
This random and horrific attack also demonstrates the futility and irresponsibility of trying to force loaded and concealed handguns onto college campuses as the solution to prevent mass shootings and gun violence.

Huh? Complete non sequitur.

To borrow a line from Chris Plante, it's brilliant in a sort of demented way. No matter what happens, it's absolute, undeniable proof that we need more gun restrictions.

8 posted on 02/28/2010 6:18:29 PM PST by VoiceOfBruck (Was "Hussein" a common American Christian name in Hawaii in 1961? Just askin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

He/She also leaves out the schools where shooters were stopped by armed students.

Anybody have names? Not exactly something you can look up on Wikipedia.


9 posted on 02/28/2010 6:20:40 PM PST by RWB Patriot ("Need has never produced anything. It has only been an excuse to steal from those with ablity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
What is amazing about the media coverage on this murderous democrat is the damn MSM's refusal to discuss the FACT that she was an ardent Obama fanatic.

Can you imagine the media coverage if an American murdered multiple people because she was denied tenure?

See, that's just the difference between Americans and the damn democrats.

It's the Americans who get their voting records published with any crimes they commit, while the damn democrats' identities are quietly swept under the rug!!!!!!!!!!!


10 posted on 02/28/2010 6:23:03 PM PST by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

No one should have a gun because somebody could go crazy and start shooting people but anyone who wants to carry a gun is too paranoid to be allowed to do so.


11 posted on 02/28/2010 6:26:34 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

What are the chances she’d have even brought the gun had she known there would be, say, a half dozen of them already in the room?


12 posted on 02/28/2010 6:40:16 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX

13 posted on 02/28/2010 6:54:30 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
I see the gun grabbers are dancing in the blood... again.

"This tragic incident shows once again that an angry individual with access to a deadly handgun can commit mass murder wherever people gather, in workplaces, shopping malls, churches, schools and yes, universities

Most of those places are unarmed victim zones (UVZs. Well, not churches in Texas, and some other places, and some workplaces (Like gun shops :)) but the rest are UVZ's in pretty much every state.

In this particular case, the school was a UVZ... did the victims a lot of good didn't it?

14 posted on 02/28/2010 10:34:57 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I should have added one more Unarmed Victim Zone: US military bases. One guy, who the regulations did not stop, killed 14, 12 of them military members, one civilian worker, and an unborn baby.

The response was to increase the general prohibition, and make bringing a gun onto post for so called "legitimate purposes", hunting and target practice, even more difficult, including requiring all such guns to be registered with the post authorities, whether stored off or on post. Plus they added the requirement that each time such a registered firearm is brought onto post, the gate guards must be notified.

Of course none of the new rules would have stopped Major Hasan from carrying out his Jihad, but they were "Doing Something".

15 posted on 02/28/2010 10:43:34 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren
What are the chances she’d have even brought the gun had she known there would be, say, a half dozen of them already in the room?

She's a nut, she very well still might have attempted the same act. But, it's highly unlikely she'd have completed as much of it, and just as unlikely she'd have been perp walked away and had her mug shot taken in a "bullet proof" vest. More likely she'd have left feet first. Might have made it to the hospital, even though she'd have lower priority than her victims, or she might not have.

Guns in "good guy" hands serve as both deterrent and response tool, should deterrence fail.

16 posted on 02/28/2010 10:48:20 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
Why does anyone think that untrained students or professors would be better able to stop a rampage shooting than trained security officers?

Is this what passes for logic? First thing, the plural of anecdote is not data. Yes, the Tacoma officers were caught unawares. So what? As far as campus is concerned it matters not that "untrained" students or anyone else can "better" stop anything. The right of self-defense is the most basic human right. There is no right to have someone else protect another. These people are delusional, and it's getting a bunch of people killed for no good reason than sophistry. Further, in an environment where the great bulk of individuals, in this case the student and faculty body, are unarmed by official policy this makes the University liable in every way.
17 posted on 03/01/2010 3:41:06 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

If only they had a rule against taking guns to campus, Amy Bishop wouldn’t have broken the law against murder and killed her co-workers. Ummmm, yeah.. sure.


18 posted on 03/01/2010 4:01:28 PM PST by SeminoleSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson