Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girl from 1995 abduction located in Calif.
upi ^ | March 5

Posted on 03/05/2010 9:39:15 AM PST by JoeProBono

MONROVIA, Calif., March 5 (UPI) -- Police said a 22-year-old woman who was a child when she was allegedly abducted by her mother has been found in Los Angeles County, Calif.

Investigators said Thursday they located Jessica Click-Hill, who was reported missing by her father in 1995, and arrested Click-Hill's mother, Wendy D. Hill, after authorities were able to track the mother-daughter pair to Monrovia, Calif., the Contra Costa (Calif.) Times reported.

FBI and police investigators were able to locate the two individuals in Monrovia thanks to a tip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

"They are a clearinghouse for people to make tips about missing children," FBI spokesman Joseph Schadler said of the center. The original source of the tip was not released.

The Times said Hill, 52, is being held on $250,000 bail after being arrested on warrants connected to the 1995 alleged abduction in Walnut Creek, Calif.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Society
KEYWORDS: abduction; custodydispute; divorce; jpb; kidnapping; parentalrights; savethemales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Sacajaweau

Family courts are a Gynocracy. We should do to the judges who have enabled this Gynocracy what the Romanians did to Ceausescu.


21 posted on 03/05/2010 10:08:31 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Family courts are a Gynocracy.

<><><><><<>

Would seem in this case, the man was given custody. That’s why mom is under arrest.


22 posted on 03/05/2010 10:14:16 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

“Oh really? Even if its more likely that he had visitation rights and she hated him so much for the usual reasons that she thought she could hurt him most severely by not allowing him to see his own daughter grow up ?”

Exactly. This girl has been deprived of he father for the most important years of her growing up, and he has been deprived of his daughter.


23 posted on 03/05/2010 10:18:02 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I’ve been parentally kidnapped. Absolutely no excuse for it, unless the mother truly was saving her daughter from abuse, and not just in her warped mind.

Father’s money and connections are irrelevant.


24 posted on 03/05/2010 10:28:42 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Big difference there. This was the kids mother.


25 posted on 03/05/2010 10:31:07 AM PST by beckysueb (Scott Brown is a start. Lets keep it going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: ChuckHam

Maybe. It depends on how she was raised and what Mom removed the kid from.


27 posted on 03/05/2010 10:32:07 AM PST by beckysueb (Scott Brown is a start. Lets keep it going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I never got that lock up the father deal. If he can’t work he can’t help with support.


28 posted on 03/05/2010 10:35:48 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (Proverbs 18:2 A fool has no delight in understanding but in expressing his own heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
Maybe. It depends on how she was raised and what Mom removed the kid from.

She was raised as a fugitive from the law after having been removed from her legal custodial parent. Had there been anything for her to be "removed from", the court would certainly not have awarded full custody to her father.

The awarding of full custody to the father is an extremely rare event, at least in California divorces.

29 posted on 03/05/2010 10:45:39 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bob

I think it would be traumatic for a child to have to live with a fugitive. This must mean that she ‘lost’ contact with all her friends, relatives, changed schools, was given another name to answer to etc.


30 posted on 03/05/2010 10:50:31 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb

Not so big a difference, as Garrido and Hill are both charged with kidnapping.

Those who do not have custody of a child (Garrido and Hill) are not legally entitled to run off with a child someone else has custody of.

So, since you are defending mom’s right to violate a court order, you must know why the courts wrongly gave custody to the father. I’m sure you’re not defending mom purely because she’s a woman (he said with dripping sarcasm).


31 posted on 03/05/2010 10:59:02 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bob
Had there been anything for her to be "removed from", the court would certainly not have awarded full custody to her father.

The papers are full of tragic stories of stupid judges giving custody to an abusive parent or gaurdian. I don't know what happened in this case and don't wish to argue about it. It was just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions.

32 posted on 03/05/2010 11:04:10 AM PST by beckysueb (Scott Brown is a start. Lets keep it going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Soooooo....still no mea culpa?


33 posted on 03/05/2010 11:24:33 PM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

The circumstances of individual divorces are as varied as the individuals who leave each other.

We have all seen father’s who will not pay because they are lousy fathers. We have seen fathers who simply did not have the resources to pay ,we have seen wives move out and move right in with their boyfriends and spend the child support on the boyfriend and not the kids.

I could go on and on as most of us can, but placing a recalcitrant husband in jail should be the last resort. as he cannot pay from jail and then probably loses the job he could have used to pay.


34 posted on 03/06/2010 5:19:45 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Well said. I hate divorce. It is so devastating to all involved but especially to children. I told my husband if he ever leaves me I am going with him. ;)


35 posted on 03/06/2010 9:19:26 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (Proverbs 18:2 A fool has no delight in understanding but in expressing his own heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson