Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Margaret Sanger, Sterilization, and the Swastika
Jesus Is Lord, Monroe Ministries webpage ^ | Mike Richmond

Posted on 03/06/2010 7:16:55 PM PST by molybdenum

"To give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation [concentration camps] or sterilization", advocated the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger in April 1932 ("A Plan For Peace", Birth Control Review; see 'appendix' for this full unabridged seminal article). Which country pioneered forced sterilization in the 20th century, Germany or the United States of America? The German program began in January 1934, but the U.S. state of Indiana passed a forced sterilization law (for mental defectives) in 1907 (when Adolf Hitler was 18 years old). Before the German...(cont'd

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; History; Religion
KEYWORDS: abortion; disabled; eugenics; jews; martinlutherking; nazis; negroes; plannedparenthood; populationcontrol; sanger
These studies and plans continue today!

Another page of this deals with specific studies by Sanger on "the Negro problem" and the "Jewish problem", and other "undesirable" peoples...

1 posted on 03/06/2010 7:16:56 PM PST by molybdenum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: molybdenum; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

2 posted on 03/06/2010 7:19:16 PM PST by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

She also visited the Soviet Anti-Christian “Museum” with Stalin in Russia. B***H

3 posted on 03/06/2010 7:22:13 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

a related thread for your perusal.

4 posted on 03/06/2010 7:22:33 PM PST by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

One of the big talking points of the left is “they don’t want to just ban abortion! Conservative Christians also want to do away with birth control!”

My response: Yes, we do. So what?

We’ll never save the family until we get away from the birth control culture. It’s what God wants. Let’s get ‘er done!

5 posted on 03/06/2010 7:40:59 PM PST by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum
Dee Dee Scozzafava accepted a Sanger award in 2009. It ought to be tattooed on her fat face.
6 posted on 03/06/2010 7:55:03 PM PST by Mobties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobties

Along with a swastika!

7 posted on 03/06/2010 8:01:14 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

Excerpt from article: Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, made Lothrop Stoddard a board member of the forerunner to PP (the Birth Control League). Why was the Birth Control League reconstituted as Planned Parenthood? The ‘Nazi smell’ of BCL was so bad, that some ‘cosmetics’ were required.

8 posted on 03/06/2010 8:22:15 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

I have 7 kids so if I want to use BC then I don’t see any reason to prevent me from doing so.

I am very much against the abortion culture but I don’t think that we should prevent people from using BC. That whole “natural” birth control is not very effective. My wife went about 4.5 years without a period so yes she got pregnant a couple of times while breast feeding.

9 posted on 03/06/2010 8:30:47 PM PST by pennyfarmer (Your Socialist Beat our Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

Nothing new to anyone who read Liberal Fascism. His Sanger chapter completely pwned

10 posted on 03/06/2010 8:32:50 PM PST by downwdims (It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

Family Planning — A Special and Urgent Concern

“Recently, the press has been filled with reports of sightings of flying saucers. While we need not give credence to these stories, they allow our imagination to speculate on how visitors from outer space would judge us. I am afraid they would be stupefied at our conduct. They would observe that for death planning we spend billions to create engines and strategies for war. They would also observe that we spend millions to prevent death by disease and other causes. Finally they would observe that we spend paltry sums for population planning, even though its spontaneous growth is an urgent threat to life on our planet. Our visitors from outer space could be forgiven if they reported home that our planet is inhabited by a race of insane men whose future is bleak and uncertain.

There is no human circumstance more tragic than the persisting existence of a harmful condition for which a remedy is readily available. Family planning, to relate population to world resources, is possible, practical and necessary. Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess.

What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims.

It is easier for a Negro to understand a social paradox because he has lived so long with evils that could be eradicated but were perpetuated by indifference or ignorance. The Negro finally had to devise unique methods to deal with his problem, and perhaps the measure of success he is realizing can be an inspiration to others coping with tenacious social problems.

In our struggle for equality we were confronted with the reality that many millions of people were essentially ignorant of our conditions or refused to face unpleasant truths. The hard-core bigot was merely one of our adversaries. The millions who were blind to our plight had to be compelled to face the social evil their indifference permitted to flourish.

After centuries of relative silence and enforced acceptance, we adapted a technique of exposing the problem by direct and dramatic methods. We had confidence that when we awakened the nation to the immorality and evil of inequality, there would be an upsurge of conscience followed by remedial action.

We knew that there were solutions and that the majority of the nation were ready for them. Yet we also knew that the existence of solutions would not automatically operate to alter conditions. We had to organize, not only arguments, but people in the millions for action. Finally we had to be prepared to accept all the consequences involved in dramatizing our grievances in the unique style we had devised.

There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger’s early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist — a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

Recently the subject of Negro family life has received extensive attention. Unfortunately, studies have overemphasized the problem of the Negro male ego and almost entirely ignored the most serious element — Negro migration. During the past half century Negroes have migrated on a massive scale, transplanting millions from rural communities to crammed urban ghettoes. In their migration, as with all migrants, they carried with them the folkways of the countryside into an inhospitable city slum. The size of family that may have been appropriate and tolerable on a manually cultivated farm was carried over to the jammed streets of the ghetto. In all respects Negroes were atomized, neglected and discriminated against. Yet, the worst omission was the absence of institutions to acclimate them to their new environment. Margaret Sanger, who offered an important institutional remedy, was unfortunately ignored by social and political leaders in this period. In consequence, Negro folkways in family size persisted. The problem was compounded when unrestrained exploitation and discrimination accented the bewilderment of the newcomer, and high rates of illegitimacy and fragile family relationships resulted.

For the Negro, therefore, intelligent guides of family planning are a profoundly important ingredient in his quest for security and a decent life. There are mountainous obstacles still separating Negroes from a normal existence. Yet one element in stabilizing his life would be an understanding of and easy access to the means to develop a family related in size to his community environment and to the income potential he can command.

This is not to suggest that the Negro will solve all his problems through Planned Parenthood. His problems are far more complex, encompassing economic security, education, freedom from discrimination, decent housing and access to culture. Yet if family planning is sensible it can facilitate or at least not be an obstacle to the solution of the many profound problems that plague him.

The Negro constitutes half the poor of the nation. Like all poor, Negro and white, they have many unwanted children. This is a cruel evil they urgently need to control. There is scarcely anything more tragic in human life than a child who is not wanted. That which should be a blessing becomes a curse for parent and child. There is nothing inherent in the Negro mentality which creates this condition. Their poverty causes it. When Negroes have been able to ascend economically, statistics reveal they plan their families with even greater care than whites. Negroes of higher economic and educational status actually have fewer children than white families in the same circumstances.

Some commentators point out that with present birth rates it will not be long before Negroes are a majority in many of the major cities of the nation. As a consequence, they can be expected to take political control, and many people are apprehensive at this prospect. Negroes do not seek political control by this means. They seek only what they are entitled to and do not wish for domination purchased at the cost of human misery. Negroes were once bred by slave owners to be sold as merchandise. They do not welcome any solution which involves population breeding as a weapon. They are instinctively sympathetic to all who offer methods that will improve their lives and offer them fair opportunity to develop and advance as all other people in our society.

For these reasons we are natural allies of those who seek to inject any form of planning in our society that enriches life and guarantees the right to exist in freedom and dignity.

For these constructive movements we are prepared to give our energies and consistent support; because in the need for family planning, Negro and white have a common bond; and together we can and should unite our strength for the wise preservation, not of races in general, but of the one race we all constitute — the human race.

Margaret Sanger was too ill to attend the award ceremony in May 1966. She died the following September. Mrs. Sanger would have been deeply honored and pleased to have heard such beautiful tributes from kindred heroes in the struggle for equality and civil rights, Dr. and Mrs. Martin Luther King Jr.

(Margaret Sanger and Martin Luther King Jr.: doing to the black population what the KKK only dreamed of doing).

11 posted on 03/06/2010 9:00:35 PM PST by aSeattleConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aSeattleConservative
No heroes, were they!

Thanks for this--I know I read it, probably last month and it always bears reading again.

12 posted on 03/06/2010 9:26:12 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer

God delivers children a a blessing. You defy God’s plan when you refuse.

13 posted on 03/07/2010 1:01:35 PM PST by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer

You have every right to use birth control.

14 posted on 03/07/2010 11:36:29 PM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Blessed Be The Name Of The Lord,For His Name Alone Is Exaulted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

In my opinion birth control can be a good,even responsible, thing.In an ideal world people would wait to get married before they have children,but since many people just want to have sex w/out any type of commitment,it’s a good idea for them to have access to birth control.People are never going to stop having sex outside a committed relationship,so it’s a good idea to have birth control so more unwanted children will not be brought into the world.

15 posted on 03/07/2010 11:42:36 PM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Blessed Be The Name Of The Lord,For His Name Alone Is Exaulted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson