Posted on 03/09/2010 11:43:24 PM PST by Chet 99
The sex criminal defines his own crime by doing what makes him or her feel good. It could be something that we wouldn’t consider as sex, such as collecting underwear or looking through keyholes. When the action that makes them feel good crosses the line of legality, we have a sex crime.
In the case of the teachers, it’s not sex that motivates them. They could arrange that at any local bar. They would not be putting their career in jeopardy(although when I was in school, just going to a bar would have been justification for firing a teacher.) There is something about the relationship with the student that makes them feel good.
Teacher’s Union has got her back..... =.=
“Beck submitted her resignation Friday in a two- or three-sentence letter, Cuseo said.”
This woman is not the sharpest knife. Had she not resigned, her Union would have made the school district pay for a extended leave of absent.
We get a lot of these threads - roughly one a fortnight - and they’re typically as formalistic as a Kabuki play.
So kudos to you for your post #16 which materially added to the FReeper knowledge base.
Thanks for the info, champ. I must have missed the point of your post.
include me out of those groups. I’m still trying to figure out why the lawyer surrendered.
and coached French.
That kid's really got stamina. Worse than the 4 hour Viagra erection.
Post of the day!
Seems like white women have decided that instead of having children they’ll sexually exploit them instead! LOL!
Looks like that 80s movie “Private Lessons” keeps becoming reality on a larger and larger scale.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mu2BCFVV2RU
Not guilty!
The people who post comments in the “lucky rascal,” “a valuable lesson,” “woo woo, good time” category always set me to thinking.
Just what “lesson” did the middle-school boy(s) learn by having adulterous sex with a married woman? “Take what you can whenever you can?” “Get what you want when you want it?” They can learn that “lesson” from any selfish jerk they run into, now or in the future.
Did they learn “This act means a lasting bond between two people who give themselves to each other in life-long loyalty and love”? No? “This act is a precious gift for fulfilling your spouse, blessing your marriage, and making a family of your own”? No?
Or did they learn “This leads nowhere, means nothing, can mean nothing, and is supposed to mean nothing”?
Yeh, that’s just what we need; more kids totally absorbed in an exciting and jangly nothing: their sex impulse like a malfunctioning cellphone that constantly rings and buzzes and vibrates, but never really connects and never has a message, and cuts off before they figure out what it’s all about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.