Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Churchill 'Scrapped' Plan to Kill Mussolini
The Times of India ^ | 3/13/10

Posted on 03/12/2010 1:28:17 PM PST by nickcarraway

Britain's wartime flying chief Arthur "Bomber" Harris chalked out a "brilliant" plan to assassinate Italy's fascist dictator Benito Mussolini during World War II, but the then PM Winston Churchill rejected it, de-classified documents have revealed.

According to the documents, Harris, the then head of Royal Air Force bomber command, wanted to use the famous Dam Busters to assassinate Mussolini and sought Churchill 's permission to plan the precision strike in 1943.

In fact, the British flying chief wanted the crack 617 Squadron to swoop low over Rome and bomb Mussolini's office and home simultaneously in an attempt to kill "Il Duce" and crush Italian support for Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler. But Churchill vetoed the plan as he feared the bombers would hit historical or civilian targets, the Daily Express newspaper reported.

The documents added the 617 Squadron was "manned by experts and is kept for special ventures of this kind".


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: assassinationplot; dictators; italy; mussolini; uk; winstonchurchill; wwii

1 posted on 03/12/2010 1:28:17 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
But Churchill vetoed the plan as he feared the bombers would hit historical or civilian targets, the Daily Express newspaper reported.

Like the one at 10 Downing St?

2 posted on 03/12/2010 1:31:23 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

‘bomber’ Harris has been called many things...but til now ‘brilliant’ wasn’t one of them.


3 posted on 03/12/2010 1:32:32 PM PST by Badeye (Still pretending Long Island is Manhattan, willie? (laughing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

4 posted on 03/12/2010 1:36:57 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Harris is generally considered to have been barking mad by the end of the war. In 1943? Who knows.


5 posted on 03/12/2010 1:40:59 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Should of sent the Incorrigible bastards.


6 posted on 03/12/2010 1:41:31 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I thought the same thing. Churchill probably thought this buffoon would bungle the raid.


7 posted on 03/12/2010 1:42:41 PM PST by CholeraJoe ("We are as numerous as the stars in the heavens, and we are all gun-men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Of course Churchill wouldn’t allow it. There has been a very long standing tradition of not targeting enemy leaders. It is expected that not engaging in leadership assassination would be reciprocated. I’m sure its a current policy as well. Dying is only for the peasants, don’t you know?


8 posted on 03/12/2010 1:44:38 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

617 Squadron, if I remember correclty, skipbombed the Roer Dams, and sank the battleship TIRPITZ using “Tall Boy “ bombs. So they had the expertise. But that being said, why would Harris want to kill Mussolini instead of Hitler? Easier to hit Bertschegarten, and the Chancellory, and Hitler was a much more important target than the “Moose”.


9 posted on 03/12/2010 1:54:03 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

Reagan in Libya sorta changed the idea. A certain leader over there still shakes in his boots thinking how close he came to pissing off a real American leader.


10 posted on 03/12/2010 1:59:47 PM PST by politicianslie (Lying got Obama elected, they don't care what you think, shut up and pay your taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Churchill feared that Mussolini would be replaced by someone competent.


11 posted on 03/12/2010 2:14:32 PM PST by rmlew (The left has elected a new nation with the help of neoconservatives and libertarians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Thinking of Slaughter House Five


12 posted on 03/12/2010 2:25:09 PM PST by Harold Shea (RVN `70 - `71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Badeye; Grut

Harris did not have the security clearance to know about ULTRA, so he didn’t realize how much information the Allies knew about how bombing was effecting the German war effort.


13 posted on 03/12/2010 3:34:28 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Churchill feared that Mussolini would be replaced by someone competent.

I kinda figure Mussolini was pretty much not worth the time and effort by July of 1943 when this plan was suggested - he had accured so much win by then that the Italians booted him on the 25th.

*Mussolini has been eliminated.*
Mussolini: lame
Roosevelt: gj Patton
Patton: thnx

14 posted on 03/12/2010 6:01:50 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Hitler was doing far too good a job making the Germans lose the war faster than they would have done if someone with a less dogmatic strategic mind was in charge.
An SOE plan to assassinate Hitler, called Operation Foxley was abandoned for this very reason....


15 posted on 03/13/2010 3:24:54 AM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

He wasn’t losing the war any faster than Mussolini, who went into WW II with tanks that needed sandbags and a lot of inferior equipment [and generals and admirals]. And since Germany was the principal British opponent [by ‘43 Mussolini was a sock puppet], going after Benny instead of Adolf makes no sense, assuming an assassination attempt was going to made.


16 posted on 03/13/2010 6:03:38 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Perhaps they took the view that Italy’s alliance with Nazi Germany was very much Mussloni’s personal policy.
Italy’s alliance with Nazi Germany collapsed very quickly after Mussolini’s downfall. Even if Mussolini was an incompetent boob at running Italy’s war effort, the fact that he was keeping Italy in a war the Italians didn’t want to be fighting made him dangerous enough to be consider taking him out...


17 posted on 03/13/2010 6:24:44 AM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

He had access to the recon photo’s before and after, not to mention the casualty figures. Even when it become exceedingly clear his strategy was an abysmal failure, he refused to acknowledge it.


18 posted on 03/15/2010 7:18:21 AM PDT by Badeye (Still pretending Long Island is Manhattan, willie? (laughing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson