Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TAITZ v OBAMA 15 REPLY to opposition-to-PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
scribd ^ | 03/11/2010 | Dr. Orly Taitz

Posted on 03/13/2010 7:42:43 AM PST by Elderberry

Motion for leave of court to add Ronald Machen, JR, US Attorney, Rudolph Contrehras, Assistant US Attorney, Alan Burch, Assistant US Attorney as additional defendants and add a Cause of Action for RICO-Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations as an Additional cause of action in the first Amended Complaint.

1. RICO One of the reasons for need for recusal of the US attorney's office, is a conflict of interest between the interests of the main client of the US Attorney's office-People of the United States of America and interests of the Defendant Barack Hussein Obama. The number one function of the US Attorney's office is to protect us, the public from criminal activity, violation of criminal statutes, fraud and treason. I have presented in my Quo Warranto complaint not only ample evidence of Barack Obama usurping the position of the President and Commander in Chief, but of him violating federal statutes, defrauding Social Security and engaging in identity theft in using social security number _4425. I have provided affidavits from licensed investigators, as well as an official Selective Service printout, showing him using this Social Security number, even though it was assigned to another individual, born in 1890 and assigned in CT between 1976-1977, while Obama resided in HI, and in light of the fact that Obama was never a resident of CT. This evidence is so overwhelming, that it doesn't even require additional investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: artbell; article2section1; awgeez; awgeezntsa; barack; barackobama; bauer; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; dnc; eligibility; holder; identityfraud; identitytheft; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; purgery; rico; taitz; tinfoilhat; usurper; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last
Found this Today. Orly's Quo Warranto case activity.
1 posted on 03/13/2010 7:42:43 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

CT? I think Orly is probably out to lunch.


2 posted on 03/13/2010 7:49:07 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
showing him using this Social Security number, even though it was assigned to another individual, born in 1890 and assigned in CT between 1976-1977,

WTF?

3 posted on 03/13/2010 7:50:32 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Supposedly the SSN that Obama is using was issued in Connecticut.


4 posted on 03/13/2010 7:52:26 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Ayaeee Ayaeee!


5 posted on 03/13/2010 7:54:56 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

6 posted on 03/13/2010 7:55:23 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“Obama resided in HI, and in light of the fact that Obama was never a resident of CT”

You must read the whole thing. And I say that with all due respect..


7 posted on 03/13/2010 7:56:15 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife

No she is NOT out to lunch, she is doing what should have already been done an was not.
Read this from page 14 and 15
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28280224/TAITZ-v-OBAMA-15-REPLY-to-opposition-to-motion-gov-uscourts-dcd-140567-15-0

Motion to dismiss is denied. Obama has to show BC, and answer why he has 39 different Social security numbers and show college records.

Great job Orly!!


8 posted on 03/13/2010 7:59:31 AM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

This health care bill passes and after the next election, you watch the attention this gets.


9 posted on 03/13/2010 7:59:33 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Here is a more reasonable pursuit of the truth http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/obamas-college.html

Obama himself said he went to pakistan while in college.
Pakistan was on the US no travel list at the time. How did he get Passport permission to travel to pakistan?

Did he get his passport punched because he was at the time a british subject? Under his fathers lineage?


10 posted on 03/13/2010 8:00:17 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Pakistan was on the US no travel list at the time.

This has been debunked many times on this site.

Perhaps you have new info or can provide a link to this.

11 posted on 03/13/2010 8:04:08 AM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Motion to dismiss is denied. Obama has to show BC, and answer why he has 39 different Social security numbers and show college records.

Great job Orly!!

You do understand that when a lawyer files a motion with the court, they include a 'suggested' order for the judge to sign. These suggested orders include everything that the lawyer wants the judge to find in response to their motion.

That's all you see on pages 14-15. It is not signed, was not written by the court, and will never see the light of day. Judges almost always craft their own orders based on how they rule on the motion.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

12 posted on 03/13/2010 8:06:20 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

You realize that what you cite is nothing more than a proposed order submitted by Orly in her filing. It is nothing Judge Lambert has issued with his signature.


13 posted on 03/13/2010 8:06:38 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Balata

I dont keep up on this stuff.

Fact is, he is inda house large and in charge.

We are best focused on the crimes he is currently committing rather than focusing on this stuff.


14 posted on 03/13/2010 8:08:44 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
After reading this, I wonder if the push to get the Confiscation of Freedom Act (health care bill) might in part be attributed to zero's remembrance of history.

There is a whole slew of people complicit in zero's usurpation

15 posted on 03/13/2010 8:09:52 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Time to lighten up on Orly. She has just bagged a big court order. While the other high priced attorneys were bashing the birthers, Orly put her life and career on the line. Well done.


16 posted on 03/13/2010 8:10:46 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

Oh darn...Royce has not signed it? Bad dream.


17 posted on 03/13/2010 8:12:00 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

I still think she is on a technical goose chase while the fox is in the hen house.


18 posted on 03/13/2010 8:12:48 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Click to the bottom of this filing on Feb. 12, 2010 and you’ll see another of her proposed orders which has gone nowhere.

http://docs.google.com/View?id=dhn5db6q_224dtth5zgn


19 posted on 03/13/2010 8:14:41 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

sad thing is alot of this is most likely true and no one cares


20 posted on 03/13/2010 8:17:18 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

The woman is a moron. No doubt about it.


21 posted on 03/13/2010 8:19:22 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport; knarf

Well now my bubble has been burst...ooops, I did not know that was not an Judge ordered thing. Oh well, I will go back to hoping that one day the truth (what ever it may be) will come out.


22 posted on 03/13/2010 8:21:57 AM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

You won’t see ‘proposed’ on a Judge’s order.


23 posted on 03/13/2010 8:24:31 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Rudolph Contrehras = Rudolph Contreras

There, I fixed it.


24 posted on 03/13/2010 8:24:37 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Orly Taitz is no moron. She is a lawyer, a dentist, and a committed American, no matter her birthplace. And when she pledges allegiance to the U.S., I bet she puts her right hand over her heart (and not the left hand the Obamas use, when forced, to pledge allegiance in public). If she never gets the results she is pushing for re Obama’s ineligibility, which is the way she chooses to end his takeover of the U.S., I applaud her bravery and tenacity.


25 posted on 03/13/2010 8:27:11 AM PST by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

One thing is for certain.

She is no anti dentite.


26 posted on 03/13/2010 8:31:59 AM PST by mylife (Opinions...$1 Halfbaked...50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/03/allen-vs-soetoro-update-all-records-for.html
THE NOOSE IS TIGHTENING


27 posted on 03/13/2010 8:39:23 AM PST by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”


28 posted on 03/13/2010 8:41:07 AM PST by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Oh no shes not.

People make fun of the so called birthers, but they should read the info thats out there and come to their own conclusions.

This woman may sound flakey, but she is trying her hardest to get this guy, any way she can...while others sit around talking about it.

If your kid enters kindergarten..you need a birth certificate.

We have had access to info on every other president..why not this one? Who the hell does he think he is? And WHY is everyone, including republicans making him get away with this??

I would love to see this woman nab this imposter and his boat load of social security cards..and I will bet if she does..people will change their tune about her.

Have you heard, also..that NOBODY remembers him from his days at Columbia? How do you attend a college and not ONE person knows you?


29 posted on 03/13/2010 8:43:49 AM PST by New Yawk Minute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute

Obama is a muslim and there are pictures of him praying in the blackhouse with muslims. and he is out to dstroy America and Orly is out to stop it. She is a GREAT AMERICAN


30 posted on 03/13/2010 8:50:14 AM PST by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: manonCANAL

I agree with you.

Last summer, I did a lot of reading on this topic, which included the list of documents he is hiding.

Many people, including those here, slam this woman and the so called birthers, without ever having read the info out there. Even if only half of it were true, its enough to question the guy there in the white house, that some people are calling “the president”.

In a country that seems to give us new rules and regulations by the day, where are the rules for this man? Why cant YOUR kid get into kindergarten without a BC?

You can ask any congressman or senator to provide you with his BC and they would be more than happy to do that.

I, myself have 2. One from the hospital and one issued by the state. Wanna see them?

This guy is hiding something. Any person with a functioning brain, knows that, without ever having read what I have.

Orly sounds flakey. But, she is the only one who will put her career on the line, to try and get rid of this scum.

He is NOT an American. She is.


31 posted on 03/13/2010 8:58:01 AM PST by New Yawk Minute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Motion to dismiss is denied.

Guess again.

32 posted on 03/13/2010 8:59:56 AM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Pakistan was on the US no travel list at the time. How did he get Passport permission to travel to pakistan?

Sorry, but this one is an internet myth, and evidence to the contrary has been posted repeatedly. There was no travel ban. There was a travel advisory, warning U.S. citizens if they wanted to stay more than 30 days in Pakistan, they had to get visas in advance. If they were staying less than 30 days, they could get a visa at the border. That was it.

33 posted on 03/13/2010 9:14:02 AM PST by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

You don’t know how to read pleadings. Orly wrote the motion to dismiss and included it as part of the peadings. Presumably, if she wins, the judge signs it.

She has as much chance of winning as I do winning the Powerball.


34 posted on 03/13/2010 9:41:12 AM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrRobertPlant2009

I got that after my post...I do not know how to read pleadings. I guess that can be a could thing as it means I stay out of court.


35 posted on 03/13/2010 9:43:52 AM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mylife

You maybe right. I don’t have a law degree so I can’t dismiss the arguments that he is an unconvicted felon for using other peoples IDs. I am much to logical to be a good judge.


36 posted on 03/13/2010 9:45:58 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65
I don't believe she actually filled this reply. I’m pretty sure that this may be the single awesomest thing ever written by a lawyer.

Soon to be a disbarred lawyer.

37 posted on 03/13/2010 9:58:00 AM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute

very well said.


38 posted on 03/13/2010 10:36:39 AM PST by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65
I applaud her bravery and tenacity.

But ya gotta shake your head at her inept performance as an attorney.

39 posted on 03/13/2010 10:43:47 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute

Obama’s Columbia College roommate remembers him and wrote about it in the Columbia College alumni magazine:
http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/jan_feb09/alumni_corner


40 posted on 03/13/2010 11:53:32 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Terrific! Go Orly go!


41 posted on 03/13/2010 12:30:10 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I agree. It is not nice of her to figure “the one” is phony and a crook. Play nice like all the other attorneys and judges.


42 posted on 03/13/2010 1:13:43 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
Oh darn...Royce has not signed it? Bad dream.

The court just got it. The reply was "received" by the court on the 11th of March. See the Clerk's U.S. District Court date stamp in the lower left hand corner on page 1.

43 posted on 03/13/2010 1:17:01 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Well Obama has to keep winning every case, if even one of them gets to discovery he’s done.

Not only will he be done, but quite possibly the entire Democratic party will be annihilated root and branch.

Lawyers, however smart-alec, will never be trusted again, if not out right banned from political office by constitutional amendment.

Or the public may not be that gentle.

Once the Obots loose the Senate and House in November, much of Obama’s political protection will evaporate.

Then we will see the attitude of Judges change.


44 posted on 03/13/2010 1:47:28 PM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute
You can ask any congressman or senator to provide you with his BC and they would be more than happy to do that.

Really? You've asked and they've provided?

Somehow I doubt that.

45 posted on 03/13/2010 1:55:06 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Oh well, I am sure the judge will find some reason why Obozo can use anyone’s SS # he wants. He has a lot of legal degrees.


46 posted on 03/13/2010 2:04:27 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

The judge hasn’t gotten around to it yet. It has only been 2 days since they received Taitz’s reply to the defendant’s motion. It will be a kick around here reading the Obot Taitz haters spew if this judge denies the Obama motion. ;-)


47 posted on 03/13/2010 2:30:05 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
Well Obama has to keep winning every case, if even one of them gets to discovery he’s done.

He's batting a thousand so far.

48 posted on 03/13/2010 2:55:50 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
I agree. It is not nice of her to figure “the one” is phony and a crook. Play nice like all the other attorneys and judges.

The woman is an absolute boob of an attorney. If this is your legal champion then God help you.

49 posted on 03/13/2010 2:57:03 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Of course he will deny it. Orly has already proven her case. Just ask her.

The only thing missing from that motion was the word, “Duh.”

Courts like it when you address them with scorching sarcasm.


50 posted on 03/13/2010 3:02:16 PM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson