Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hate Paying for Cable? Here’s Why.
All Things Digital: MediaMemo ^ | March 8, 2010 | Peter Kafka

Posted on 03/15/2010 8:16:02 AM PDT by TomGuy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: edh
I have just put “Lost” and the new “Battlestar Gallactica” on our netflicks list! :-)
41 posted on 03/15/2010 9:14:25 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Yummy.

42 posted on 03/15/2010 9:15:25 AM PDT by TankerKC ("...wankerKC..." --agromination March 11, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: K.B.7

That’s basically what I said. They don’t just sell ESPN by itself, they sell the package with all the ESPNs, and part of those contracts includes how they’ll sell the tiers to the customers which includes these other ESPN parts that nobody watches.

The problem with IPTV is that basically the same people that are pushing packages on the cable companies will control the feed. They’ll sell the packages to the last mile guys of IPTV the same way they’re selling the packages to the last mile guys of cable. Not to mention the fact that half the high speed internet in this country is coming from the cable companies, who have already lost this fight with the channels. It’ll be same $#!+ different box for IPTV.


43 posted on 03/15/2010 9:16:33 AM PDT by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1
I choose to get cable because there are a handfull channels that I do enjoy. To get them I must subsidize a plethora of crap.
44 posted on 03/15/2010 9:27:11 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: discostu
It’s a natural tendency of companies in similar markets to conglomerate.

C. J. Prahalad of the University of Michigan is an expert of this phenomenom, and he dubbed it, "The Rule of 3". I have studied this in several industries, including auto and telecommunications industries. I had not followed the entertainment/cable industry at all, so your data filled in a lot of holes.

Personally, I do not see the business model change until such time that the consumers stop paying the current prices. Unfortunately for me, it seems the entertainment generation is a multi-generation thing. That is, I doubt too many people will stop buying or call their cable operators for discounts.

45 posted on 03/15/2010 9:28:50 AM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

bless you!


46 posted on 03/15/2010 9:30:38 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
The lack of an a la carte option is the reason we have rabbit ears.

You're part of an increasing number.

For those of us who watch little television, rabbit ears or the new generation of small-footprint outdoor antennas is a very good alternative. Over the air (``OTA'') reception now is actually better quality than what you get via the compressed pipeline of cable. The onetime investment in a good antenna (typically well under $50-$100) pays off in just a couple of month's worth of cable bills.

47 posted on 03/15/2010 9:32:48 AM PDT by re_nortex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

I have the same thing. I call it The Cheap B@stard Package. It’s $11 a month.

It has all I want, though:

All local stations in digital HD
Fox News
History, Dicovery, Food, Hallmark, etc..
TBS, TNT, etc..


48 posted on 03/15/2010 9:36:53 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

I doubt entertainment will get down to three, but the basic reasons for all the mergers are the same. Definitely nothing about the cable bill will change until viewers convince Disney they’re so annoyed at paying 18 cents for ESPN Classic they’re actually willing to stop paying 4 bucks for ESPN.


49 posted on 03/15/2010 9:43:55 AM PDT by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Considering the lack of content and the ever increasing advertising, we won’t be renewing our DirectTV subscription. We pay about $45/month and the disconnect fee is $20 per month unused, so, we’ll just go until October then cancel. We can get the network channels over the air in HD and Hulu the rest of the shows we watch. FoxNews has become useless for information so that’s not a concern anymore. I can listen to Rush online and Mark Levin over Sirius. For news, FR is about as good as any as it covers many topics and sources with few liberal injections. :) I’ll miss having the various “educational” type of channels like Military, Discovery, etc., but I wouldn’t mind having less TV in my life anyway. It has become not much past filler.


50 posted on 03/15/2010 9:46:57 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
The whole business model is built on delivering eyeballs to advertisers.
And here I thought the airwaves belonged to we the people.
51 posted on 03/15/2010 10:09:02 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
And here I thought the airwaves belonged to we the people.

Theoretically. But what "we the people" have decided to do with them, through our elected representatives, is to rent them to commercial interests whose stockholders demand they make a profit.

The alternative is a system like Britain's, with government sponsored programming supported by user fees.

Of course, with cable, none of the "public airwaves" stuff matters, since they're not using any.

52 posted on 03/15/2010 10:21:32 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chris37

When is the last time you’ve seen a good movie on HBO?

Movie? none, but last night on HBO I got to see The Pacific.


53 posted on 03/15/2010 10:27:56 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Interesting.

Where I live 1 mile from my town's border in Montana I cannot get cable, natural gas or (due to my proximity to a mountain range) most FM broadcast stations - all local.

As such we have Dish.

Happy St. Patty's day to you (a wee bit early).

54 posted on 03/15/2010 11:59:33 AM PDT by Leo Farnsworth (I'm really not Leo Farnsworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Leo Farnsworth
Happy St. Patty's day to you (a wee bit early).

And the same to you (from this German)...

I will have a beer in your honor, BTW >)

55 posted on 03/15/2010 12:01:23 PM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I know, it seems like they are stuck on about the same 15 movies over and over...I always said they show nothing month after month, but it is the “same” nothing month after month. Oh look, Showtime is showing “Replicant” again, in case you missed it the first 5,000 times and can’t be here for the next 5,000 times...


56 posted on 03/15/2010 12:07:44 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Well, I’m not sure what the Pacific is...If HBO has a good series on then that’s cool, but I do want to see movies on movie channels from time to time.

I remember back when I was a kid watching HBO feature presentation Conan the barbarian, and it was awesome. First R movie I snuck as a kid :D

But now it seems like HBO is a never ending stream of worthless, useless garbage, and eleven channels of it. I swear to God if I see Bill Maher one more ******* time I’m gonna...never mind.


57 posted on 03/15/2010 12:11:16 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Of course, with cable, none of the "public airwaves" stuff matters, since they're not using any.
I wouldn't be too sure of that.

58 posted on 03/15/2010 12:17:53 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: chris37

The Pacific is the follow up to Band of Brothers. Looks like it’s gonna be a good one.

Bill Maher is an ass. No doubt.


59 posted on 03/15/2010 12:18:43 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson