Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How will this work? Court challenges to Obamacare (V)
Vanity | 03-18-2010 | Tuxedo

Posted on 03/18/2010 5:33:01 PM PDT by Tuxedo

So, assuming the Senate Bill gets passed under the following scenarios - what is the likelihood of intervention?

Yeas/Nays - bill passes. I would suppose the first challenge would be the Constitutionality of requiring Citizens to purchase a service violates the Commerce Clause (see Seminole Tribe v. Florida) as the Federal Government cannot supercede sovereignty of the States. Further, there can be challenges filed by various State Attorneys General on the basis of the Tenth Amendment. Given this, I would presume that a Federal Judge (preferably a Strict-Constructionalist) can stay the Law. This would then get appealed and certainly make its way to the USSC. Can that be delayed until November?

Should the Slaughterhouse Rule be used to deem the bill passed, we already know The Landmark Legal Foundation will file suit that the law violates Article 1, Section 7 of the US Constitution. I presume a stay would be granted and the matter making its way to the USSC.

Given knowledge of precedence and case law, what do you think would be the outcome?

Should the matter not be settled favorably, a takeover of the House (Senate won't matter as much) can result in Republicans denying funding for Obamacare and adding its repeal into every bill passed. I realize that part of the Bill says it cannot be repealed, but to me that is just semantics.


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: obamacare; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Let me know how you see this playing out.
1 posted on 03/18/2010 5:33:02 PM PDT by Tuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo
In my opinion...any effort to throw the “health care” bill out based on the unconstitutional “deem” process should also include bringing up the congressmen up for charges of treason. I'm serious...not hyperbole
2 posted on 03/18/2010 5:37:36 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

agree totally. I wonder if there is anything the State governments can do. They willfully violated their oaths. Can they be arrested as soon as they return to their states? Or do they maintain Congressional Immunity...


3 posted on 03/18/2010 5:39:39 PM PDT by Tuxedo (Sheesh....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo

The SC judges are right now trying to figure out how to dodge the confrontation and allow Ozero his tyranny.


4 posted on 03/18/2010 5:44:09 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo
A QUESTION FOR YOU: If the courts start deciding, in various states, that the provision requiring people to buy insurance is unconstitutional, how will that affect Obamacare as a whole? Isn't that a core assumption of the whole bill?
5 posted on 03/18/2010 5:44:48 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo

Perhaps the “cannot be repealed” part has to be repealed first?


6 posted on 03/18/2010 5:45:25 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

They can do what they always do i.e. rule “narrowly” and strike down a sub clause while leaving the substance and the socialism intact.


7 posted on 03/18/2010 5:46:43 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Any State Court ruling can get kicked up to the USSC. See Bush v. Gore. That’s where this battle gets won or lost.


8 posted on 03/18/2010 5:47:42 PM PDT by Tuxedo (Sheesh....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I think you hit the nail on the head. They might take out the internment camps and leave the rest. LOL


9 posted on 03/18/2010 5:49:36 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Simply not funding any salaries of the makeup of the death panel essentially moots the point about is being repealable. However - I looked through the Constitution and didn’t see much that would suggest a law can be written that cannot be repealed. Or vice-versa. So we’d have to look into precedents.


10 posted on 03/18/2010 5:49:55 PM PDT by Tuxedo (Sheesh....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

No elected federal official will ever be charged with treason. Senators and Congressmen all would fear that it could be one day used against them if they let it happen for any reason. A president is not going to allow his Justice Department to so charge anyone who is on the president’s side.


11 posted on 03/18/2010 5:50:02 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo

Nice summary.


12 posted on 03/18/2010 5:51:17 PM PDT by craigster_nc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


13 posted on 03/18/2010 5:51:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://themagicnegro.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo
Wow, just saw, that spell checker portion of the site really butchered my post, lol.

I don't know if states have recourse to arrest criminal congressman.

Some states have a recall process, but given that many are up for election in Nov, it would be faster and easier to remove those through the ballot box. As for those who aren't up for reelection...those states need to pursue recall.

14 posted on 03/18/2010 5:51:41 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

If the “deem”-ing process is ruled unconstitutional, then the whole law is overturned. That could take quite awhile to happen and we’d be well into election season. But I agree that if it passes on Yeas/Nays then it is more likely to stand - and then we’d see states file 10th Amendment claims. The fabric of the nation will be tested for sure.


15 posted on 03/18/2010 5:52:36 PM PDT by Tuxedo (Sheesh....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
No elected federal official will ever be charged with treason. Senators and Congressmen all would fear that it could be one day used against them if they let it happen for any reason. A president is not going to allow his Justice Department to so charge anyone who is on the president’s side.

Well, the problem is, if there isn't a workable civil solution congress and the senate is then leaving the only remaining solution a civil war. I most certainly hope they will allow for justice short of something so extreme.

16 posted on 03/18/2010 5:53:23 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
......process should also include bringing up the congressmen up for charges of treason. I'm serious...not hyperbole

I'm with you. Of course, being on Atilla's right flank, I think hanging is too good for them, but seriously.......

either expand Ft Leavenworth to accomodate them for a 30 year sentence OR lifetime exile after forfeiting all assets to the state they were supposed to be representing at the time of their treason.

Nam Vet

17 posted on 03/18/2010 5:53:56 PM PDT by Nam Vet (Inuendo IS NOT an Italian suppository.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

“The SC judges are right now trying to figure out how to dodge the confrontation and allow Ozero his tyranny.”

I don’t know, I think Obama picked on the wrong group of people in his State of the Union campaign speech.


18 posted on 03/18/2010 5:54:16 PM PDT by Persevero ("Our culture is far better than a retarded Islamic culture." -Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo

The more states that jump on the nullification band wagon the more power it puts in the states hands. We have three as of now..or nearly three. If another four or five get on board it will be very hard for the SCOTUS to ignor.

GET YOUR STATE TO VOTE FOR NULLIFICATION.

Ok, then what happens? The feds will try to force those states back in line.

Question. Of you who are vets on here. Do you think that those in the military would fire upon citizens of the US?


19 posted on 03/18/2010 5:54:27 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet
either expand Ft Leavenworth to accommodate them for a 30 year sentence OR lifetime exile after forfeiting all assets to the state they were supposed to be representing at the time of their treason. Nam Vet

I'd agree to exile...preferably to the liberal's nation of choice between Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea or Iran.

20 posted on 03/18/2010 5:57:32 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson