Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More "Boom and Bust" Cycles Coming: The Real Reason Buy and Hold Is Dead
yahoo ^ | Mar 29, 2010 09:01am | by Aaron Task

Posted on 03/29/2010 7:43:47 AM PDT by Touch Not the Cat

With major averages flat or slightly negative for the past 10 years, many investors have given up on the "buy and hold" strategy that became a mantra in the 1990s. That, of course, has prompted some contrarians to declare that now is the best time to be a buy and hold investor. In this case, the conventional wisdom is right, says Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI).

"I'm not saying 'buy and hold' is a bad thing, unless you're having more frequent recessions," he says. And that is precisely what ECRI expects in the coming decade because of two big patterns that Achuthan says are irreversible:

One, sucessive recoveries from post WWII recessions have become weaker and weaker "on every count," including growth, sales, employment and production. Two, there's more volatility in the economy, with the big swoon in late 2008-early 2009 and surge in more recent months being a glaring example. Achuthan predicts we have entered a period of "more ‘boom and bust'-type cycles," similar to what occurred in the 1970s. "The Great Moderation is history," he says, referring to the period starting in the mid-1990s when many economists (and policymakers like Ben Bernanke) believed the business cycle had been smoothed out, if not eradicated.

"You don't have to be a mad scientist," he says; just "back off your risk in the stock market and buy bonds" if a recession appears imminent. "And if we see a recovery take more exposure and get out of bonds because the recovery is going to give you a little inflation."

If recessions are more likely - and more intense in scope - then investors will demand higher risk premiums for owning equities, Achuthan explains in the accompanying clip.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: stagflation

1 posted on 03/29/2010 7:43:47 AM PDT by Touch Not the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat

Deep recessions, smaller recoveries, means a dying economy, which means socialism. Investing will end up being the equivalent to gambling in a casino, where if you are working with the house (whoever is connected to the folks that run the game) you win; if you are on your own you will lose over time. These guys claim to be able to time the market . . . rotsa ruck.


2 posted on 03/29/2010 7:53:13 AM PDT by Woebama (Never, never, never quit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson