Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOMESTIC TERRORISM The Sovereign Citizen Movement ^ | April 13, 2010 | n/a

Posted on 04/16/2010 1:41:41 AM PDT by Cindy

Note: The following text is a quote:

DOMESTIC TERRORISM The Sovereign Citizen Movement


Some examples of illegal license plates used by so-called sovereign citizens.

Domestic terrorism—Americans attacking Americans because of U.S.-based extremist ideologies—comes in many forms in our post 9/11 world.

To help educate the public, we’ve previously outlined two separate domestic terror threats—eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists and lone offenders.Today, we look at a third threat—the “sovereign citizen” extremist movement. Sovereign citizens are anti-government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or “sovereign” from the United States. As a result, they believe they don’t have to answer to any government authority, including courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments, or law enforcement.

This causes all kinds of problems—and crimes. For example, many sovereign citizens don’t pay their taxes. They hold illegal courts that issue warrants for judges and police officers. They clog up the court system with frivolous lawsuits and liens against public officials to harass them. And they use fake money orders, personal checks, and the like at government agencies, banks, and businesses.

That’s just the beginning. Not every action taken in the name of the sovereign citizen ideology is a crime, but the list of illegal actions committed by these groups, cells, and individuals is extensive (and puts them squarely on our radar). In addition to the above, sovereign citizens:

Commit murder and physical assault; Threaten judges, law enforcement professionals, and government personnel; Impersonate police officers and diplomats; Use fake currency, passports, license plates, and driver’s licenses; and Engineer various white-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes.

Sovereign citizens are often confused with extremists from the militia movement. But while sovereign citizens sometimes use or buy illegal weapons, guns are secondary to their anti-government, anti-tax beliefs. On the other hand, guns and paramilitary training are paramount to militia groups.

During the past year, we’ve had a number of investigative successes involving sovereign citizens. A few recent cases:

In Sacramento, two sovereign citizens were convicted of running a fraudulent insurance scheme. Operating outside state insurance regulatory guidelines, the men set up their own company and sold “lifetime memberships” to customers, promising to pay any accident claims against their “members.” The company collected millions of dollars, but paid out very few claims. More

In Kansas City, three sovereign citizens were convicted of taking part in a conspiracy using phony diplomatic credentials. They charged customers between $450 and $2,000 for a diplomatic identification card, which would bestow upon the holder “sovereign” status—meaning they would enjoy diplomatic immunity from paying taxes and from being stopped or arrested by law enforcement. More

In Las Vegas, four men affiliated with the sovereign citizen movement were arrested by the Nevada Joint Terrorism Task Force on federal money laundering, tax evasion, and weapons charges. The investigation involved an undercover operation, with two of the suspects allegedly laundering more than a million dollars from what they believed was a bank fraud scheme. More

You can help. First, “be crime smart”—don’t fall for the bogus claims and scams of sovereign citizens. And second, if you have information on any suspicious activities or crimes, please contact us.

Resources: - Lone Offenders - Eco-terrorists and animal rights extremists

TOPICS: History; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: csm; domesticterrorism; fbi; sovereigncitizen; sovereigncitizens; sovereignty; terrorism; terrorist; terrorists; terrorst

1 posted on 04/16/2010 1:41:41 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Congressional Testimony

Robert S. Mueller, III
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Statement Before the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies

April 15, 2010

SNIPPET: “National Security Threats

Terrorism: Terrorism, in general, and al Qaeda and its affiliates in particular, continue to leverage proven tactics and tradecraft with adaptations designed to address its losses and the enhanced security measures of the United States. Al Qaeda seeks to infiltrate overseas operatives who have no known nexus to terrorism into the United States using both legal and illegal methods of entry. Further, al Qaeda’s continued efforts to access chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear material pose a serious threat to the United States. Finally, al Qaeda’s choice of targets and attack methods will most likely continue to focus on economic targets, such as aviation, the energy sector, and mass transit; soft targets such as large public gatherings; and symbolic targets, such as monuments and government buildings.

Homegrown violent extremists also pose a very serious threat. Homegrown violent extremists are not clustered in one geographic area, nor are they confined to any one type of setting—they can appear in cities, smaller towns, and rural parts of the country. This diffuse and dynamic threat—which can take the form of a lone actor—is of particular concern.

While much of the national attention is focused on the substantial threat posed by international terrorists to the homeland, the United States must also contend with an ongoing threat posed by domestic terrorists based and operating strictly within the United States. Domestic terrorists, motivated by a number of political or social issues, continue to use violence and criminal activity to further their agendas.

Cyber: Cyber threats come from a vast array of groups and individuals with different skills, motives, and targets. Terrorists increasingly use the Internet to communicate, conduct operational planning, propagandize, recruit and train operatives, and obtain logistical and financial support. Foreign governments have the technical and financial resources to support advanced network exploitation, and to launch attacks on the United States information and physical infrastructure. Criminal hackers can also pose a national security threat, particularly if recruited, knowingly or unknowingly, by foreign intelligence or terrorist organizations.

Regardless of the group or individuals involved, a successful cyber attack can have devastating effects. Stealing or altering military or intelligence data can affect national security. Attacks against national infrastructure can interrupt critical emergency response services, government and military operations, financial services, transportation, and water and power supply. In addition, cyber fraud activities pose a growing threat to our economy, a fundamental underpinning of United States national security.

Weapons of Mass Destruction: The global weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threat to the United States and its interests continues to be a significant concern. In 2008, the National Intelligence Council produced a National Intelligence Estimate to assess the threat from chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons and materials through 2013. The assessment concluded that it remains the intent of terrorist adversaries to seek the means and capability to use WMD against the United States at home and abroad. In 2008, the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism concluded that “the United States government has yet to fully adapt….that the risks are growing faster than our multilayered defenses.” The WMD Commission warned that without greater urgency and decisive action, it is more likely than not that a WMD will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013.

Osama bin Laden has said that obtaining WMD is a “religious duty” and is reported to have sought to perpetrate a “Hiroshima” on United States soil. Globalization makes it easier for terrorists, groups, and lone actors to gain access to and transfer WMD materials, knowledge, and technology throughout the world. As noted in the WMD Commission’s report, those intent on using WMD have been active and as such “the margin of safety is shrinking, not growing.”

Foreign Intelligence: The foreign intelligence threat to the United States continues to increase as foreign powers seek to establish economic, military, and political preeminence and to position themselves to compete with the United States in economic and diplomatic arenas. The most desirable United States targets are political and military plans and intentions; technology; and economic institutions, both governmental and non-governmental. Foreign intelligence services continue to target and recruit United States travelers abroad to acquire intelligence and information. Foreign adversaries are increasingly employing non-traditional collectors—e.g., students and visiting scientists, scholars, and businessmen—as well as cyber-based tools to target and penetrate United States institutions.”

2 posted on 04/16/2010 1:46:41 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Government monopoly on force, theft, fraud, money laundering and insurance scammery is OK.

Clean your own white house and congress, first. I’ll be impressed.

3 posted on 04/16/2010 2:05:26 AM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All


Note: The following text is a quote:

Prepared Remarks by Secretary Napolitano at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum
Release Date: April 15, 2010
Cambridge, Mass.
Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

SECRETARY NAPOLITANO: Good evening and thank you. It’s an honor to be here at the Kennedy School Forum. I know it’s become something of a rite of passage for officials to come here to express their views, and then engage in a famously tough round of questioning. But as a person who answers to more than 80 different Congressional committees and subcommittees, I think I’m ready.
I have a real appreciation for the Kennedy School, especially because I have some key staff who were educated here. Some are here tonight, so if you don’t agree with something, I’ll let you take it up with them directly.

For me, being here carries a special weight. Leaders have come to Harvard for many, many years to frame the significant issues our nation and our world faces. Perhaps most famously, George Marshall addressed Harvard graduates in 1947 as Secretary of State, and described for them the colossal challenge of rebuilding a world torn apart by war. Marshall described the scale of devastation after WWII, and told the students,
“the problem is one of such enormous complexity that the very mass of facts presented to the public by press and radio make it exceedingly difficult for the man in the street to reach a clear appraisement of the situation.”
Today, America’s challenges are quite different. And in our information age, so too are the ways the person in the street gets their information. But George Marshall’s central point still rings true. And, arguably, it’s more important than ever that our citizens have a clear understanding of today’s security challenges.

Tonight, I want to share that “clear appraisement of the situation” because I believe the American people want, and deserve, candor about what we face. I will talk about the threats we’re seeing at the Department of Homeland Security [DHS], what we’re doing to confront them, and what I think every American can do to help.

I should say that despite the sweeping name of my Department, the responsibility within the federal government to keep our homeland secure does not lie solely with us. The United States military, and the men and women who wear our country’s uniform, play an absolutely vital role. So do the nation’s intelligence agents, law enforcement officers, and our diplomats around the world. It is truly a “whole of government” effort, involving many Departments and Agencies coordinating their roles.
The New Threat Picture

My department was created after September 11th, 2001. And today, our first priority remains protecting against, and preventing, another terrorist attack on America. At DHS, we are constantly looking for ways to make it harder for terrorists to strike us, and to bounce back quickly if they do.

Our Department, and our government, has substantially re-aligned itself so that we’re confronting threats before they fully emerge. And over the past year, DHS has organized itself to confront four categories of threats.
First, we all recognize the desire of foreign terrorists to strike here at home. The attempt to blow up an American airliner on December 25th was a stark reminder of how terrorists adapt their tactics to get around our security measures, and kill citizens from around the world.

It’s not just keeping these people off planes. It’s also preventing terrorists from entering through our air, sea, and land ports of entry, or along our thousands of miles of border and coastline. And it’s detecting the presence of any chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon being smuggled into the country.

Second, we are confronting a variety of domestic threats. You have all read about recent cases of “home-based” terrorism, where men and women, who often grew up here, have become violent extremists, often following an interaction with a charismatic radicalizer online, or in terrorist training camps abroad. Some of these individuals have ties to al Qaeda or other terror groups—like David Headley, who just pled guilty for his role in the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, and Najibullah Zazi, who recently pled guilty to plotting to bomb the New York Subway.

Domestically, we are also dealing with “lone wolf” violence, individuals not connected to a terror cell or larger group, but who commit acts of public violence, often on behalf of a grievance. We’re on guard against dangerous individuals or groups who would use employment to gain access to public places like airports, malls, and train stations, or sensitive infrastructure like water treatment, chemical, or energy plants. And we’re staying vigilant for possible spillover violence along our Southwest border where we are a strong partner with Mexico in taking the fight to the drug cartels in that area.
A third category of threats are those from cyberspace. Here, DHS is responsible for safeguarding our government’s civilian computer networks against crime and attacks. But this isn’t some future threat. It’s here now. We’re confronting it every day. And the implications not just for government, but for all of us, are enormous.
Combating the cyber threat is going to require a partnership among government, academia, and the private sector as ambitious and sustained as any our nation has seen before. And I should say to the bright students here that DHS wants the best minds coming out of our universities to come join us in this effort.
Finally, I would add a fourth kind of concern we’re trying to counteract—and that’s the threat of complacency and of unrealistic expectations. Since I became Secretary more than a year ago, I’ve emphasized that the American people need to be prepared, not scared.

But rejecting the politics of fear doesn’t mean the threats are any less real, or that we shouldn’t consider what they mean for our families and our communities. In a world of fast-changing threats, we simply must resist the urge to become complacent or cynical about what’s before us. We must not leave ourselves, our families, and our communities less than fully prepared.

What We’re Doing About the Threats

When I spoke about the threats from terrorism in remarks last year at the Council on Foreign Relations, I argued that our adversaries were every bit as “networked” as the society around us. The very same networks the vast majority of us use to connect and to build, those small few use to recruit and destroy.

And amid the social media revolution that we’re steeped in, violent extremists have also harnessed the power of YouTube, MySpace, and Twitter to target vulnerable individuals. When Facebook was invented in a dormitory here on the Harvard campus, could anyone imagine that just five years later, among its 400 million worldwide users, would be extremists calling for violence against America from half a world away?

You’re all aware how online education has flourished. Well, the Internet has become a powerful distance-learning tool for would-be terrorists, as well. And just like the Internet itself, the new terrorist threats are diffuse, they are versatile, and they are constantly evolving.

Securing America against these threats—while simultaneously expediting the legal flow of people and commerce, and staying true to the values and rights that define our nation—is the essence of the 21st century enterprise we call homeland security. To succeed, we need to be fast, flexible, and creative.
So, how is the Department of Homeland Security countering these types of threats? First, keeping terrorists and other criminals out of the country is a fundamental responsibility for DHS. Right now, we are pursuing an historic international aviation security initiative to strengthen a system that has been an engine for growth and prosperity, both here and abroad.

This is a system on which we all rely. But it has weak links. And, therefore, all nations share the threats to that system, as well as the responsibility for safeguarding it. If you’ve flown lately, you may have noticed a heightened law enforcement presence, and some new screening procedures around the country. That will continue…and will continue to evolve to stay ahead of new threats.

But the U.S. government doesn’t conduct screening abroad. So we’re working closely with our international partners to make sure that we address any weak links … so that a terrorist can’t exploit a security gap in one country to gain access to the entire global aviation network. In fact, just this month we instituted a new, real-time, threat-based screening policy for all air carriers with international flights to the United States, which supersedes the emergency measures put in place after December 25th.

We’re also working to secure strong international agreements so that all of our allies and international partners can benefit from one another’s intelligence about known terror suspects. This goes beyond aviation security as well. We’re using the logic of information-sharing and threat-based protocols to implement a smart, strategic approach to passenger and cargo screening at our sea and land ports as well.

Second, we are also working to better understand and counter the threat from individuals who are already in the country. We primarily do that by ensuring that state, local and tribal law enforcement have access to information and intelligence about the threats we face so they can confront them on the frontlines.

By sharing information with them, we are enlisting them in our terrorism prevention efforts. And by receiving information from them, and sharing it with our federal partners, we are maximizing the chance for success at each level. And as DHS increases the capacity of our law enforcement partners to understand and analyze local trends, we are becoming a more valuable resource for communities themselves.

Indeed, we’re working hard to build trust, to learn from, and to share our resources and experience with communities to help them combat violent extremists – here or abroad – that target vulnerable individuals. As President Obama’s counterterrorism advisor, John Brennan, recently said, “keeping our country safe and protecting our sons and daughters from hateful ideologies demands trust and cooperation.”

Of course, science and technology also play an indispensable role in all the domains where we work. Confronting emerging threats requires anticipating them, and then getting out in front of them. For that reason, we’re investing heavily in research and development – with a strong focus on the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats that have the potential to cause the greatest harm.

What does this look like? It means we are accelerating the deployment of new explosive detection equipment, advanced imaging technology, and canine teams at our airports; supporting research to better understand and detect suspicious behavior, as well as chemical and biological agents; partnering with universities and private industry to study threats to agriculture, critical infrastructure, and the food supply; and working with law enforcement and the private sector to counter the threat of improvised explosive devices.
Next, to combat the rapidly evolving threats from cyberspace, we’re moving quickly on two fronts: to secure our government’s civilian computer networks against attack; and to work with the private sector and public to increase the overall level of security in cyberspace. One very important piece of this is educating and informing Americans. And so last month I announced a competition using what we call a “wisdom of crowds” approach to increasing our cyberliteracy.

Our “National Cybersecurity Awareness Campaign Challenge” is open to experts and non-experts alike, and rewards innovative ways of spreading the word about how the public can help secure the country simply by making their own online habits more secure. The challenge is open until April 30th and I invite you to join it at

And lastly, to fight against complacency, and make our nation more ready and resilient, we’re working to engage and empower the public to take the most basic steps: to get an emergency kit, make an emergency plan, and be informed. Are we there yet? The short answer is no. We need all families, all communities, all of our businesses, to be talking about their plans, and thinking about how to get smarter and better equipped to deal with a range of potential emergencies.

How do we get there? Well, the government certainly has a role, and part of that role is being straight about the nature of the threats we face. And part of it is continuing to work day and night, and constantly ask ourselves if we’re doing everything we can to prevent another terrorist attack. But making a habit out of preparedness...making it part of our culture...will ultimately draw on the innovation and civic spirit of the American people. And our nation has never lacked for that.

The Role of Resilience

In the past, we’ve heard some argue that to defeat terrorism, the government has to be right 100 percent of the time, while the terrorists only have to be right once. I reject that premise. We can’t put a dome over our country. We can’t guarantee there won’t be another attack. No one can.

But we are a strong, resilient country. And we must resolve that even a successful attack will not be a defeat for our way of life. We can target our resources against emerging threats and evolving risks. We can better empower the American public, and draw on what President Obama has called our greatest national security asset: our values.

Indeed, it is those values that define us as a nation. And those values will always be a force more powerful than the murderous ideology of a tiny few. So let’s be clear about what victory against terrorism and violent extremism actually means. Democracy and freedom have stood the test of time. They are superior in every way to the perverse narrative of killers and criminals…which is what terrorists really are.

We must then leverage the shared American values that have led us to victory before. Every single one of us can become smarter, can become better informed, and better prepared. But that becomes possible when the “man on the street” knows and understand the kinds of threats I’ve described tonight.
On a concrete level, Americans have to work to build preparedness—to ensure that our communities are prepared to address any danger that comes their way, from terrorist threats to natural disasters. On a more abstract level, Americans also must work to build resilience—the ability to get up and come back stronger if we get hit.

That doesn’t come from a set of government programs. That comes from the heart of the American people. It knows no ethnic, religious, racial, or other boundaries. And no violent fringe can take it away. We will need that resilience to fight today’s emerging threats, just as we did in the days after Pearl Harbor and after 9/11.
Our nation has faced down violent radical movements before. We’ve witnessed terrorism, at home and abroad, and could witness it again some day. In big ways and small, that resilience has been a pillar of our security. We saw it in the passengers who took matters into their own hands on September 11th, and indeed again on December 25th. Or the security personnel who saved lives at Ft. Hood last year, or at the Pentagon just last month.

All these examples could have ended differently. But the resilience, the decency, and the sense of shared responsibility that kicked in each time took them in another direction. Terrorism is a tactic designed not just to kill, but to make us feel powerless. But we are never powerless. We control the way we prepare ourselves, the way we anticipate and combat the threats, and the way we respond if something does happen.

America is a strong nation. We are a resilient nation. And as we confront these new threats, we will use our values and our way of life as the most powerful source of our strength. For now, and for years to come. Thank you.

This page was last reviewed/modified on April 15, 2010.

4 posted on 04/16/2010 2:11:11 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Note: All formatting errors are mine.

5 posted on 04/16/2010 2:12:18 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

6 posted on 04/16/2010 2:14:26 AM PDT by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
It seems to me they're watering down the definition of a terrorist to include almost any criminal act.
7 posted on 04/16/2010 2:26:31 AM PDT by whershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

As President Obama’s counterterrorism advisor, John Brennan, recently said, “keeping our country safe and protecting our sons and daughters from hateful ideologies demands trust and cooperation.”

Thank you, comrade.

8 posted on 04/16/2010 2:34:45 AM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
During the past year, we’ve had a number of investigative successes involving sovereign citizens. A few recent cases:
  1. In Sacramento, two sovereign citizens were convicted of running a fraudulent insurance scheme. Operating outside state insurance regulatory guidelines...

  2. In Kansas City, three sovereign citizens were convicted of taking part in a conspiracy using phony diplomatic credentials.

  3. In Las Vegas, four men affiliated with the sovereign citizen movement were arrested by the Nevada Joint Terrorism Task Force on federal money laundering, tax evasion, ....

Gee I don't see any problem or crimes committed???
  1. In Sacramento, they were just undocumented Insurance Agents.

  2. In Kansas City, they were just undocumented Diplomats.

  3. In Las Vegas, they were just undocumented Bankers.

I thought the FBI had no problem with people who were doing things while being "undocumented"?

In fact the guys in Las Vegas sound like they should be on the short list for...
next US Treasurer.

9 posted on 04/16/2010 4:58:15 AM PDT by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson