Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glenn Beck Should Revere Theodore Roosevelt
Newsmax ^ | 5/3/10 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 05/04/2010 5:29:11 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden

It is remarkable that Theodore Roosevelt (TR to his friends), who has been beloved as an iconic patriot and president, would become a controversial figure today.

This unusual development is largely due to the rise of Glenn Beck.

Glenn has been right on many issues and his views are resonating with Main Street.

But he is wrong on one big issue: Theodore Roosevelt is not, as he claims, the root cause of President Obama’s intrusive, “big government” policies.

It is no accident that TR’s face is chiseled into Mount Rushmore along with those of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, as he is rightly regarded by historians as one of the greatest presidents in American history.

He was raised to that height in the national consciousness by the weight of important achievements that significantly advanced the interests of the United States.

Strong in this belief, I have found Glenn Beck’s criticism of TR surprising.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: beck; glennbeck; lds; mormon; roosevelt; socialism; talkradio; teddyroosevelt; theodoreroosevelt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last
I like Beck. I think his TV show is the best one on Fox. However, he has been very wrong on TR and I'm glad someone in the media has finally stepped out and said something about it. If you look at the list of "progressive" things TR was for, the only one I would disagree with would be the income tax. I think that if TR could see today what has become of the income tax, he would probably be against it also.

I like to think that if TR were alive today, he would be right out front at a tea party event pounding his fist and railing against this current government.

1 posted on 05/04/2010 5:29:11 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Beck’s right on this one. Roosevelt was a progressive. He deeply distrusted business and worked hard to move the Republican party to the left. I’m not sure why Newsmax is ignoring his record.


2 posted on 05/04/2010 5:35:00 AM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Unfortunately, TR let the Tax genie out of the bottle with his lack of foresight and his childish, idealistic “progressivism.”. It doesn’t matter how much he might regret his mistake; we’re now condemned to pay the price.

If it were up to me, we’d erase his face from Rushmore and replace it with Ronald Reagan’s.


3 posted on 05/04/2010 5:36:32 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Did you read the article? Are you against child labor laws? Is that being socialist?


4 posted on 05/04/2010 5:36:38 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I agree, mostly, with Beck.

TR, far more than Lincoln, who is so often blamed, is responsible for the idea that the government is responsible for fixing our problems. While TR no doubt would be appalled by today’s intrusive government, once the idea has been accepted that “when people hurt, the government must move,” there is no logical stopping point short of full totalitarisnism.

After Lincoln, and especially after the end of Reconstruction, the federal government returned to a limited role not utterly dissimilar to what it was before the War.

Since TR the federal government has continually expanded in both size and mission. Even presidents like Coolidge and Reagan were able only to slow its growth, not reverse it.


5 posted on 05/04/2010 5:39:28 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
I can't stand Glenn Beck, and I have no idea why this loud mouth would earn 42 million dollars annually.

I also have no idea why anyone at FR would care one way or another what any of these media billionaires has to say.

6 posted on 05/04/2010 5:39:53 AM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
For a (not so pretty) look at TR I strongly recommend ...

7 posted on 05/04/2010 5:40:19 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"Unfortunately, TR let the Tax genie out of the bottle with his lack of foresight and his childish, idealistic “progressivism.”."

I think a lot of freepers would like to see either a flat tax or national sales tax implemented with the elimination of the income tax. However, if 100 years from now, that were distorted into something we never intended it to be, do we take the blame?
8 posted on 05/04/2010 5:40:33 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
If it were up to me, we’d erase his face from Rushmore and replace it with Ronald Reagan’s.

Right on buddy! Right on!

9 posted on 05/04/2010 5:40:43 AM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

” I’m not sure why Newsmax is ignoring his record.”

Because most Republicans are not for small government.


10 posted on 05/04/2010 5:45:35 AM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

“Theodore Rex” is another great read.


11 posted on 05/04/2010 5:46:10 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
And that is what Theodore Roosevelt always tried to do, to act according to the practical needs of the occasion, to make America strong and No. 1 on the world stage.

Hoist by his own petard.

If one always "acts according to the practical needs of the occasion," it seems pretty obvious that one will constantly be expanding the role of government, as that is in general the most obvious way of dealing with any problem. A true conservative recognizes that some problems are the price we must pay for limited government, thereby avoiding the problems caused by unlimited government. This analysis leaves out the obvious issue that expanding the government to deal with "the practical needs of the occasion" seldom is all that effective at actually solving those needs.

"Making America strong and No. 1 on the world stage" is a defensible goal, but it also quite obviously requires a government that in size and scope is far beyond that envisioned by the Founders.

12 posted on 05/04/2010 5:47:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
However, if 100 years from now, that were distorted into something we never intended it to be, do we take the blame?

I expect to be dead in 100 years. However, if policies I supported while living turned out to have bad consequences, those suffering the consequences could legitimately "blame" me.

13 posted on 05/04/2010 5:50:47 AM PDT by Tax-chick (It's a jungle out there, kiddies; have a very fruitful day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
...do we take the blame?

Yes, you do. There is enough human history to know that government expands as much as possible and abuses any powers given. That's why the founders didn't allow for a national sales tax or a national income tax.

I think a lot of freepers would like to see either a flat tax or national sales tax implemented with the elimination of the income tax.

Some of us want to see the 16th amendment repealed and the income tax replaced with nothing. Return to having the government doing what was given to it to do in article 1, secion 8 of the US constitution and they don't need much money at all. What they need they can get off constitutional funds sources.

14 posted on 05/04/2010 5:50:49 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Are you against child labor laws? Is that being socialist?

Well, yes it is.

It's a type of socialism, as with Social Security and many other policies, that has been accepted by most Americans, including myself, as the article says.

But that doesn't make these policies of government intervention into private businesses and lives any less socialistic, it just means we have grown used to many socialistic policies.

15 posted on 05/04/2010 5:51:17 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
And you can't wait to tell us how much you hate him every chance you get.

I have no idea why this loud mouth would earn 42 million dollars annually.

Oh, so you feel like he's earned enough money already?

16 posted on 05/04/2010 5:51:42 AM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

TR was correct about big business. If you do not keep an eye on them they will corrupt officials and cheat the people. Look what happen in Wall Street. Selling mortgage backed securities to investors as AAA investments and at the same time betting against them with options (indicating they knew the MBS were financially unsound). Then go overseas and help the Greek government hide their deficit spending. Do you know how many pro US former East European bloc nations are financially underminded by Wall Street who sold them shaky mortgage backed securities to their banks and pension funds??!!!! Russia loves it, and the former Communist opposition parties chumping at the bit for an election loves it also.


17 posted on 05/04/2010 5:54:01 AM PDT by Fee (Peace, prosperity, jobs and common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!
Because most Republicans are not for small government.

Bingo! The winner! Most Republicans are all for liberty when it comes to themselves, but they don't want liberty for their neighbors. In fact, they often want the government to regulate, sometimes literally at the point of a gun, their neighbors actions. Thus, they grow government because they don't like what some people are doing. Just like leftists in the Democrat party.

18 posted on 05/04/2010 5:54:16 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative
"Some of us want to see the 16th amendment repealed and the income tax replaced with nothing."

And when we no longer have an army to protect us because there are no more funds to do it, I hope you're ready to stand your ground when the Chinese/Muslims/bad guy at the moment comes calling. Because if we didn't have the worlds strongest military, I guarantee you we would be invaded before long. There are legitimate reasons for a federal government. Lets work on getting rid of the illegitimate reasons for government while leaving the legitimate reasons intact.
19 posted on 05/04/2010 5:55:03 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

“However, if 100 years from now, that were distorted into something we never intended it to be, do we take the blame? “

If you support something that supports the monstrous leviathan that is the federal government, you are very much to blame. These tax schemes are meant to maintain current levels of revenue and current level of government. The income tax was just as wrong in 1913 as it is today. Those who instituted it are much worse than those who now go along with it. The first had to take much initiative to get the job done.


20 posted on 05/04/2010 5:56:33 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Thx. Imperial Cruise really shocked me w/ regard to planting the seeds of WWII (in 1905!).


21 posted on 05/04/2010 5:56:34 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Theodore Roosevelt started the Progressive Party in 1912 and ran with this new party, as a 3rd party candidate when he did not get the GOP Nomination. That assured that Woodrow Wilson, the most leftist President in the 1900’s got elected.

T. Roosevelt reminds me of McCain. Had lots of money, was against Big Business, and sided with the Environmental Wackos.

From Wikipeadia:

“After two weeks, Roosevelt, realizing he would not be able to win the nomination outright, asked his followers to leave the convention hall. They moved to the Auditorium Theatre, and then Roosevelt, along with key allies such as Pinchot and Albert Beveridge created the Progressive Party, structuring it as a permanent organization that would field complete tickets at the presidential and state level. It was popularly known as the “Bull Moose Party,” which got its name after Roosevelt told reporters, “I’m as fit as a bull moose.”[63] At the convention Roosevelt cried out, “We stand at Armageddon and we battle for the Lord.” Roosevelt’s platform echoed his 1907–08 proposals, calling for vigorous government intervention to protect the people from the selfish interests.[64]

“ To destroy this invisible Government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.” - 1912 Progressive Party Platform, attributed to him[65] and quoted again in his autobiography[66] where he continues “’This country belongs to the people. Its resources, its business, its laws, its institutions, should be utilized, maintained, or altered in whatever manner will best promote the general interest.’ This assertion is explicit. ... Mr. Wilson must know that every monopoly in the United States opposes the Progressive party. ... I challenge him ... to name the monopoly that did support the Progressive party, whether ... the Sugar Trust, the Steel Trust, the Harvester Trust, the Standard Oil Trust, the Tobacco Trust, or any other. ... Ours was the only programme to which they objected, and they supported either Mr. Wilson or Mr. Taft... “

“He (Roosevelt) did win 4.1 million votes (27%), compared to Taft’s 3.5 million (23%). However, Wilson’s 6.3 million votes (42%)”

So thank you Theodore Roosevelt for giving us 2 terms (8 years), of Woodrow Wilson, one of the worst Presidents in History.


22 posted on 05/04/2010 6:00:15 AM PDT by Mifflin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“...it just means we have grown used to many socialistic policies.”

EXACTLY! What should have happened, is that the parents and loved ones of the children who were being used and abused should have worked to better their lot in life - not force their kids into the same doldrums of their own adult lives!

Almost ALL government corrections of a “capitalistic” problem are TOO MUCH and become WRONG HEADED in short order!


23 posted on 05/04/2010 6:01:34 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Hey Congress: Go Conservative or Go Home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fee

Your rant against wall street is amusing. You left out the part about how those banksters would have had to have faced the downside of their bad decisions had it not been for government protecting them with money stolen from the people.

The banksters own Congress. If the federal government were following the US Constituion, there would be no bailouts, no SEC, no Federal Reserve, no fiat currency, no FDIC (which has been insolvent for years), no federal regulations on banking.

Banks that did risky things would be punished through failure and possibly fraud prosecution in their state if there was fraud involved.

The Federal Reserve and the fiat currency and the fractional reserve banking allow all these financial games to happen.

The federal government is unconstitutionally meddling in the market with financial regulations.

They are restricting freedom and created the boom and bust cycle hand-in-hand with the Federal Reserve, they enable banksters to defraud the world when they bail them out and mandate risky schemes like lending to lots of people who are credit risks.

Who wants global government now to cover up their failings? The international banksters.


24 posted on 05/04/2010 6:02:07 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Wow, so having a law that says kids 10 years old can’t work 12 hours a day in coal mines is socialism. News to me. I go by the Websters dictionary version of socialism which says that the government controls the means of production and distribution of services and goods. I don’t see where having child labor laws deals with that.

You see, I’m in favor of free markets, not crony capitalism. Which by the way we are dealing with today. The same type of stuff TR had to deal with back in his day. Back then, his crony capitalists was Rockefeller. Today, ours is Shifty Paulsen’s Goldman Sachs. Isn’t it funny that Rockefeller’s kin are Democrats....


25 posted on 05/04/2010 6:03:17 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Beck is not wrong. Have you read this book?

You should. And then read this one


26 posted on 05/04/2010 6:05:07 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

While serving as a Sunday School teacher, Teddy Roosevelt noticed one of his students sported a black eye. Roosevelt asked him if he had been fighting. The child reported that he had defended his sister against an older boy who had been bullying her. Roosevelt rewarded him with a dollar and praised his behavior.

The church elders dismissed Roosevelt shortly after this event.


27 posted on 05/04/2010 6:05:32 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
The United States began the slow act of suicide in 1912 when Wilson, Taft, and Roosevelt endorsed the income (Progressive) tax.

"When our tax laws are revised, the question of an income tax and an inheritance tax should receive the careful attention of our legislators. In my judgment, both of these taxes should be part of our system of Federal taxation."--T. Roosevelt

In terms of great civilizations/"super powers", the United States is just an infant. I guess those that pressed and passed the 16th Amendment thought it was better to burn out than fade away.
28 posted on 05/04/2010 6:05:32 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Remember that TR’s generation was dominated by ruthless “robber barons” who did not hesitate to use devious means to eliminate competition.

Yeah. those 'evil' “robber barons” -- gag me. Without those "robber barons", America wouldn't have become America.

Like with those evil 'robber barons' who owned the Railroads and connected East with West. Or that other evil 'robber baron', John D Rockefeller who made gasoline available to everyone (by cutting prices) with his Standard Oil Company, which iirc kind of boosted the fledging Auto Industry. Or that Andrew Carnegie 'robber baron' fellow who made Steel and created the US Steel Company.

So yeah, shame on them. Those rich 'robber baron' bast##ds! Off with their heads.

When I was in grade school and taught about those 'robber barons' you got the impression they ate puppies for breakfast.

29 posted on 05/04/2010 6:06:31 AM PDT by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee

“Look what happen in Wall Street.”

You fail to notice that once again, it was government intrusion into the home buyer market (trying to force/encourage home ownership) that foisted these “shaky mortgages” on the market in the first place.

Look, if you were forced to buy 1000 lemons a day at your tea stand, there is a good chance, you will start selling lemonade before too long. Now, when we find out that the lemons were old and starting to go bad - don’t yell at me for trying to make a profit off of something that was FORCED UPON MY BUSINESS!


30 posted on 05/04/2010 6:07:46 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Hey Congress: Go Conservative or Go Home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
And that is what Theodore Roosevelt always tried to do, to act according to the practical needs of the occasion, to make America strong and No. 1 on the world stage.

“Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”

William Pitt

31 posted on 05/04/2010 6:09:13 AM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
And when we no longer have an army to protect us...

Huh? 60% of the budget or more is used for social security and medicare/medicaid. Maybe we could then cut back on policing the world. Are they our children? Are they not adults who can run their own lives?

Because if we didn't have the worlds strongest military, I guarantee you we would be invaded before long.

Really? What was that quote from Yamamoto? something about not wanting to invade the US because their was a rifle behind every blade of grass. Repeal every federal weapons law, tell the people to arm up, and you won't have a problem with invasion. Do you believe what you wrote? You need to stop living life out of fear.

Lets work on getting rid of the illegitimate reasons for government while leaving the legitimate reasons intact.

Like I said. Article 1, section 8 lists those legitimate reasons. Funding a military is one of them. Hve you read the US Constitution recently? Have you seen what the budget is used for recently? If they can't raise the money through means that don't involve making us all slaves, then they shouldn't buy it.

Your fear campaign will not work on me.

32 posted on 05/04/2010 6:10:20 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Your’s is a lame ‘for the children’ defense; typical of the Left.

Child labor laws had been a social issue well before TR and would have become law with or without TR.

TR was the first president to spend taxpayer dollars on a grand peacetime Navy. This was but one symptom of his global vision for America, but it all cost much more than the nation had been accustomed to spending, hence leading to progressive tendencies of power grab and calling for taxation of income without apportionment.

TR was not popular at the end of his presidency because of his overreach tendencies, his resorting to certain tactics to denigrate his opposition, his acts of self-embellishment.

You have one point that is accurate, TR had regrets later in life. He was capable of looking back and seeing the error of his ways. But he was not steeped enough in Christian philosophy to see the nature of mankind and its government to take precedent from seemingly innocent things and grow them into horrors. That’s why Beck calls TR out on his history, because TR could not ‘see’ the dangers behind the doors he opened with good intentions.

But TR is not completely to blame. In his time there were many people behind a plethora of populist causes; “Child Labor Laws”, the beginnings of “income taxation” and socialist Marxist philsophy. Marx was not yet a discredited economic philsophy, rather a popular egalitarian subject of political philosophy.

In short, the era of TR and especially the years that followed were awful for America. From a slate of populist issues, laws that were short-sighted were passed and even amendments to the Constitution were made that forever changed the character of freedom in America. Child labor laws were one of many laws that shifted power from states to the federal government. In the years following, it was used as one of the precedents for minimum wage laws, forced retirement savings such as Social Security and a number of socialist trophy issues that are now bankrupt and have culminated in the ultimate theft of American freedom in Health Care reform, the governance of our health.

It’s time to shift power back to states, to reverse the century of overreaching influence starting from the time of TR, repealing the 16th and 17th, and replacing the US Tax code with a growth inspiring and freedom preserving new tax code:

http://www.fairtax.org


33 posted on 05/04/2010 6:10:57 AM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mifflin

In many ways TR was a great man. However, it was he who popped the cork on Big Gubmint while President and it was he who opened the door to the loons forever by enabling Wilson. The greats often make mistakes. Too bad TR’s were so colossal.


34 posted on 05/04/2010 6:12:19 AM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

If you read the book “The myth of the Robber Barons”, you see that some of them worked to provide customers with innovative products. Others worked with government to get government protection.

The first is capitalism, the other is an illegitimate use of government.


35 posted on 05/04/2010 6:14:11 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mifflin
"Theodore Roosevelt started the Progressive Party in 1912 and ran with this new party, as a 3rd party candidate when he did not get the GOP Nomination. That assured that Woodrow Wilson, the most leftist President in the 1900’s got elected."

Well, I'll agree with you on that one. He did that out of hate and spite for Taft. It was wrong. However, there is not a President that I like I cannot find fault with somewhere along the line. For instance, I love Ronald Reagan, but I can list numerous things he did that was wrong. Our intervention in Beirut (I know, I was there), his amnesty for illegals. He raised taxes on gas in 1983. He passed gun control laws as governor of California.

Like Reagan, I look at the totality of TR and in totality he was a great President.
36 posted on 05/04/2010 6:15:48 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
the government controls the means of production and distribution of services and goods.

Which is exactly what child labor laws do. They rule out one method of producing and distributing goods and services by making it illegal.

By your definition no government has ever been socialistic, as no government has ever been able to fully "control the means of production and distribution of services and goods."

But it is entirely accurate to call policies, such as prohibiting child labor, that move society in a socialist direction socialistic in tendency if not in nature.

We quite obviously live in a mixed economy. We are probably at present roughly equidistant between true capitalism and true socialism. This has benefits as well as drawbacks. Arguably it's the most free system compatible with a fully modern society.

But that a policy with socialist tendencies is beneficial and possibly even necessary does not cause it to cease being socialist.

37 posted on 05/04/2010 6:16:05 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
The State governments will have the advantage of the Federal government, whether we compare them in respect to the immediate dependence of the one on the other; to the weight of personal influence which each side will possess; to the powers respectively vested in them; to the predilection and probable support of the people; to the disposition and faculty of resisting and frustrating the measures of each other.

The State governments may be regarded as constituent and essential parts of the federal government; whilst the latter is nowise essential to the operation or organization of the former. Without the intervention of the State legislatures, the President of the United States cannot be elected at all. They must in all cases have a great share in his appointment, and will, perhaps, in most cases, of themselves determine it. The Senate will be elected absolutely and exclusively by the State legislatures. Even the House of Representatives, though drawn immediately from the people, will be chosen very much under the influence of that class of men, whose influence over the people obtains for themselves an election into the State legislatures. Thus, each of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments, and must consequently feel a dependence, which is much more likely to beget a disposition too obsequious than too overbearing towards them. On the other side, the component parts of the State governments will in no instance be indebted for their appointment to the direct agency of the federal government, and very little, if at all, to the local influence of its members.

From The Federalist No. 45

THIS my friend is what has been lost and until we restore it we will never again be what our founders intended!

38 posted on 05/04/2010 6:16:43 AM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

Great post, MichiganConservative.


39 posted on 05/04/2010 6:22:55 AM PDT by Tax-chick (It's a jungle out there, kiddies; have a very fruitful day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

I’m all for repealing the 17th amendment.


40 posted on 05/04/2010 6:24:10 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fee
The derivatives/securities would be a lot harder to “trade”/”Ponzi” if the government was not pressing lenders to hand out mortgages like free samples of candy. The addicts are also to blame, trying to live beyond their means, not understanding ARMs, trying to flip houses, etc...

A perfect storm of corruption/political orgies, which makes placing the blame an easy to fit according to one('s) own personnel ideology.
41 posted on 05/04/2010 6:26:27 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Teddy Roosevelt was a progressive who thinks business profits should be reinvested in the community.


42 posted on 05/04/2010 6:31:19 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

B.S.

Theodore Roosevelt was a progressive and a statist.

He did not start the trend towards big government, but he certainly accelerated it, and brought it into the GOP.

He should be denounced by any conservative.


43 posted on 05/04/2010 6:44:00 AM PDT by B Knotts (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. That’s what progressives of every stripe specialize in: good intentions.


44 posted on 05/04/2010 6:49:34 AM PDT by shezza (Darling husband will be home from Afghanistan in four weeks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
It is remarkable that Theodore Roosevelt (TR to his friends), who has been beloved as an iconic patriot and president, would become a controversial figure today.
This unusual development is largely due to the rise of Glenn Beck.

Conservatives have always had trouble with some of TR's domestic policies.

45 posted on 05/04/2010 7:33:00 AM PDT by Rufii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

TR’s ego wrote checks that we are still having a hard time cashing.

I’d like to begin by noting that H.L. Mencken wrote a vanity press book, simple in composition, of the speeches of TR on one page, and the near identical writings of Friedrich Nietzsche on the opposite page. So when you think of the philosophy of TR, keep this in mind.

Next, TR was in many ways responsible for the overburdening federal government we have today. He had no use for the individual States at all, and saw them as just obstructing absolute federal power.

Likewise, in his “Imperial Presidency”, he had disdain for congress, to the point of sending the US navy halfway around the world, to force them to pay for its return.

His idea of taking State lands for federal parks and conservation areas, purely by proclamation, has become a nightmare for the western United States, the federal government now claiming the majority of the land West of the Mississippi, and seizing more and more land with each president.

TR also laid the groundwork for his fellow progressive Woodrow Wilson, and his nightmare image of America. So convinced of his own grandeur, he was willing to tear apart the Republican party to prevent its candidate from being elected.

More than anything else, TR is regarded as a great president solely because of his progressivism. The progressive movement made sure of that, with the help of the Hearst newspapers, especially.

Though I am loathe to even suggest it, for similar reasons today, if you can imagine the MSM demanding the face of Obama on Mount Rushmore, you can see the parallel.


46 posted on 05/04/2010 7:41:28 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Reagan deserves a place on the rock, but so does TR, if only for his foreign policy. After all, he waged a successful war against Islamic terrorists in the Philippines.
47 posted on 05/04/2010 7:42:11 AM PDT by Rufii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

As pointed out in the books above, the press was equally complicit in molding the image of TR, as they are with Obama, and it is entirely because he was a progressive.


48 posted on 05/04/2010 8:20:47 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rufii

The Philippine Insurrection was indecisive and long drawn out, until two subordinates of General Pershing decided to execute some Moro pirates and have them buried in pits with dead pigs, to send a message.

As such, credit for the successful conclusion goes not to the White House, or to conventional military tactics, but a willingness to use unconventional means, though the final decisive battle was won after Roosevelt had left office.

The war itself, and the duplicitous nature of the US annexation which caused the war, resulted in the formation of the anti-imperialism league, founded by Mark Twain, which did much to persuade the American public of the vile nature of the European model of colonization, and that while the US should keep the Monroe Doctrine, it should not engage in such behavior itself.


49 posted on 05/04/2010 8:44:06 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rufii

We’ve always had trouble with most of TR’s domestic policies. I know the issues of his day aren’t really homologous to the issues we face in the present, but on all of them, Roosevelt was on the side of expanding the power and reach of the federal government.


50 posted on 05/04/2010 8:57:48 AM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson