Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Problem Detected with Voyager 2 Spacecraft at Edge of Solar System
Space.com ^ | 5/6/2010 | Tariq Malik

Posted on 05/08/2010 6:33:55 AM PDT by Dallas59



NASA has commanded the famed Voyager 2 probe to send only information on its health and status after spotting a puzzling change in the spacecraft's pattern of communication from the edge of the solar system.




The 33-year-old Voyager 2 spacecraft, which is currently 8.6 billion miles (13.8 billion km) from Earth, is apparently still in good health, according to the latest engineering data received on May 1. But Voyager 2's flight data system, which formats information before beaming it back to Earth, has experienced a hiccup that altered the pattern in which it sends updates home.

Because of that pattern change, mission managers can no longer decode the science data beamed to Earth from Voyager 2. The space probe and its twin Voyager 1 are flying through the bubble-like heliosphere, created by the sun, which surrounds our solar system.

The first hint of a problem came on April 22, when engineers first spotted the data pattern change. Since then, they've been working to fix the glitch and began sending commands back to Voyager 2 on April 30.

Because Voyager 2 is so far from Earth, it takes 13 hours for a message to reach the spacecraft and another 13 hours for responses to come back to NASA's Deep Space Network of listening antennas around the world.
"Voyager 2's initial mission was a four-year journey to Saturn, but it is still returning data 33 years later," said Voyager project scientist Ed Stone of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "It has already given us remarkable views of Uranus and Neptune, planets we had never seen close-up before. We will know soon what it will take for it to continue its epic journey of discovery."

Voyager 2 took a so-called "grand tour" of the solar system when it visited the gas giant planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune in the 1980s by taking advantage of a rare planetary alignment that occurs once every 176 years.
The two space probes were built primarily to study Jupiter and Saturn, but Voyager 2 also swing by Uranus in 1986 and Neptune in 1989 during its extended mission.
NASA launched Voyager 2 on Aug. 20,1977, just two weeks before Voyager 1. Together, the two spacecraft are the most distant human-built objects in space. Voyager 1 is about 10.5 billion miles (16.9 billion km) away from Earth and in perfect health, mission managers said.


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: pioneeranomaly; spacecraft; voyager2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Mmogamer

My 1972 Wheelhorse lawn tractor still runs. They don’t make them like they used to.


21 posted on 05/08/2010 7:06:17 AM PDT by Freds2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Solid-state chips I helped make are on that space ship.
Presumably, they'll be out there 'zooming' around a million years after I'm gone.
22 posted on 05/08/2010 7:08:39 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
25 years old NASA. NASA now cannot hardly launch a kids rocket.

This was NASA, 25 years ago.

23 posted on 05/08/2010 7:12:10 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

-455 Fahrenheit...average


24 posted on 05/08/2010 7:13:12 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
"Because of that pattern change, mission managers can no longer decode the science data beamed to Earth from Voyager 2."

It's pretty obvious what happened. Voyager 2 saw something that the government doesn't want us to know about, so they commanded Voyager to encrypt its transmissions. It's quite possible that NASA indeed can not decrypt the transmissions, but certain other agencies within the government sure as hell can. I wonder what they saw?

25 posted on 05/08/2010 7:15:21 AM PDT by Batrachian (America electing Barack Obama is the moral equivalent of Palestinians electing Hamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

Obama’s spaceship....


26 posted on 05/08/2010 7:16:09 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

NASA 1967:

“Apollo 1 (official designation Apollo/Saturn-204) was planned to be the first manned mission of the Apollo manned lunar landing program to launch in February 1967. Its flight was precluded by a fatal fire on January 27, which killed all three crew members (Command Pilot Virgil “Gus” Grissom, Senior Pilot Edward H. White, and Pilot Roger B. Chaffee), and destroyed the Command Module cabin. This occurred during a pre-launch test of the spacecraft on Launch Pad 34 at Cape Canaveral. The name Apollo 1 chosen by the crew, was officially assigned retroactively in commemoration of them.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1#Incident


27 posted on 05/08/2010 7:16:48 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

>>>Voyager 2 spacecraft, which is currently 8.6 billion miles (13.8 billion km) from Earth

If I did the math correctly

0.0014629270371999592 Light Years in 33 years.

And the next closest star is Alpha Centauri, at about 4.37 light-years distant.


28 posted on 05/08/2010 7:17:53 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59; Thebaddog
Re: How cold do you think it gets out there?

-455 Fahrenheit...average

"Absolute zero is the theoretical temperature at which entropy would reach its minimum value. The laws of thermodynamics state that absolute zero cannot be reached because this would require a thermodynamic system to be fully removed from the rest of the universe. A system at absolute zero would still possess quantum mechanical zero-point energy. While molecular motion would not cease entirely at absolute zero, the system would not have enough energy for transference to other systems. It is therefore correct to say that molecular kinetic energy is minimal at absolute zero.

By international agreement, absolute zero is defined as 0(K) on the Kelvin scale and as −273.15°C on the Celsius scale.[1] This equates to about −459.67°F on the Fahrenheit scale. Scientists have achieved temperatures very close to absolute zero, where matter exhibits quantum effects such as superconductivity and superfluidity."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero

29 posted on 05/08/2010 7:31:30 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
From Earth to 92 AU
30 posted on 05/08/2010 7:38:58 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
0.0014629270371999592 Light Years in 33 years. And the next closest star is Alpha Centauri, at about 4.37 light-years distant.

So it would take Voyager... um, carry the one... a little less than a hundred thousand years to reach Alpha Centauri? If it were even going that direction...

31 posted on 05/08/2010 7:42:14 AM PDT by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Re: Voyager 2 spacecraft, which is currently 8.6 billion miles from Earth

If I did the math correctly:
[8.6 billion miles = ] 0.0014629270371999592 Light Years (in 33 years).

Well, one light year, the distance light travels in a year at its constant speed of 186,000 miles per second, works out to about 5.9 trillion miles.

And so,

8.6 divided by 5,900 = 0.0014

So you are correct.

32 posted on 05/08/2010 7:45:00 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
now bad for something prolly running what, a 8088 or 286 wi 64k or 128K ram???
33 posted on 05/08/2010 7:45:29 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Yup. When rocketry was still relatively new and they got more done with half the people.
34 posted on 05/08/2010 7:46:09 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (If you can read this you are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Actually upon reflection, Challenger was probably the break point where NASA went from cando to F’ed up.
35 posted on 05/08/2010 8:03:15 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (If you can read this you are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Actually upon reflection, Challenger was probably the break point where NASA went from cando to F’ed up.
36 posted on 05/08/2010 8:03:15 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (If you can read this you are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Could be ominous.


37 posted on 05/08/2010 8:07:19 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Re: 0.0014629270371999592 Light Years in 33 years. And the next closest star is Alpha Centauri, at about 4.37 light-years distant.

So it would take Voyager... um, carry the one... a little less than a hundred thousand years to reach Alpha Centauri? If it were even going that direction...

Correct.

33 years/0.0014629 LYs x 4.37 LYs = 98,500 years

38 posted on 05/08/2010 8:15:00 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Absolutely. Despite a few flaws along the way.


39 posted on 05/08/2010 8:17:36 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Can you imagine the mileage charge on the service call?


40 posted on 05/08/2010 9:03:40 AM PDT by SouthTexas (Congress is out of order!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson