Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/01/2010 4:08:12 PM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JoeProBono

Of course they violated his rights, it is called the first amendment. The government, no matter what form it takes, has no jurisdiction or authority to forbid people to display or wear artifacts of their religion.


2 posted on 06/01/2010 4:11:31 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
Hey! I've got an idea! Instead of punishing the Catholic kid wearing them for religious reasons, why not beat the shit out of the gutless little heathen gang-bangers for hiding behind them as a 1st Amendment right?

Nah. That would make too much sense for 21st century Homo Sapiens. The perpetrator is the victim now, and all that inverted twaddle.

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."

3 posted on 06/01/2010 4:18:24 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
The forgotten clause:

“or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

5 posted on 06/01/2010 4:24:20 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We should therefore make the best use of what has been already discovered - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson