Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another patriot is being killed.
Atlah Newsletter ^ | June 17, 2010 | michael master

Posted on 06/17/2010 8:01:11 PM PDT by bronkburnett

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin refuses to be deployed to Afghanistan under the orders of Barack Hussein Obama until the government proves that Obama is qualified to be president of the USA according to the Constitution of the USA. The military is using a court martial to force his compliance. Lakin is trying to use discovery in the court martial about Obama’s citizenship as per his rights to defend his actions and the court is blocking his ability.....

Obama promised to be transparent. It is time for our courts, our media, and our military to force him to keep his promise….. by any means necessary.

Barack Hussein Obama needs to prove that he was born a natural citizen and that he never had a dual citizenship as an adult. America needs to see his college documents, his passports, and his long form birth certificate. And we all need to support Lt. Col. Terry Lakin as a true patriot who is honoring his oath as an officer.

(Excerpt) Read more at atlah.org ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: army; bananarepublic; birthcertificate; certifigate; kangaroocourt; lakin; military; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamacitizenship; obmaa; patriotism
How hard would it be for the Chicago thugs who surround Obama to threaten the families of these judges? Or to bribe them? How hard is it for the liberal media cartel to demean those who want proof about Obama’s citizenship as per our Constitution?
1 posted on 06/17/2010 8:01:11 PM PDT by bronkburnett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett

Yes, he’s a patriot. Yes, he has run afoul of forces far beyond his comprehension. He’s screwed....and we are a far, far lesser nation because of it.


2 posted on 06/17/2010 8:03:46 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett

The “Burden of proff” is on the prosecution. They need to prove that the order to deploy is lawful by verifying the lawfulness of Obama’s eligibility.


3 posted on 06/17/2010 8:08:26 PM PDT by rfreedom4u ("A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett; LucyT

Dr. James David Manning:

Anthropomorphic is the ultimate word used to make God physically understood. Such a term attributes to God features of man as in hands, feet, eyes, and other likenesses of men.

While we do not mean to place Satan on the same level as God, however he too must subscribe to our physical imagination.

One of the basic acts of our polite culture is to brush our teeth, and thank God we do.

I will forgive you if you accuse me of being a fundamental Bible believer when I tell you we are living in the tribulation days of the false messiah, Mt. 24:24, the son of Satan, Barack Obama.

Most learned men will agree and applaud you if you accuse me of taking the Bible literally, and I will applaud them.

Having said that, I further believe that Barack Hussein Obama is the son of Satan; a one of a kind emissary of hell. If he is not, surely the Bible declares one is on the way. As William James said, “Let’s be clear about what we can be clear about.”

The past, present, and future reality of Satan in the earth is beyond dispute. A proven fact owing only to what tense you may approve.

Now, I wish to surely challenge your rationale and the full cost of your education. I declare unto you; all the morning stars did sing together, and darkness was upon the face of the deep, then Obama emerged in question by the loins of a Dark Continent dweller and a rebellious Eve named Stanley Ann.

More than the mystery of Obama’s blazing charisma is his proof of origin. Surely he is not “Natural Born” but villainously so. From the ancient volcanoes of Kenya he arrived on a flame from hell. As Maureen Dowd, of The New York Times said, “Obama is Bloodless.”

What is happening to our nation and world that we allow this piece of pumice to reign over men? Indeed, not just any man, but the nobility of America swoons under his sway. Have we lost our sanity compass and now we bow before the sewer of Alcatraz?

Today, the best of our leaders pump their chest and consider it noble to only debate Obama’s policies and declare his character, and his constitutional ineligibility not of interest or profit as a sacred vow.

They, “politicians,” call great conventions about his dental hygiene “healthcare reform,” but never once breathe a word about his dark and incorrigible being.

They, “politicians,” are even planning a major political contest this November and the next; spending collectively 5 billion dollars debating how often he does not brush his teeth. Yet, not one dollar will be spent warning the world about the curse of doom for humanity that is upon his lips. How can they be so infatuated with his brand of toothpaste, yet make no mention that he is a political serial criminal? Why have they made him king when he is not even born a citizen; to call Barack Hussein Obama president of America is tantamount to calling Mother Teresa the queen of hell.

The Bible, that book for “poor unlearned people, the opiate of the masses” declares, when the days of Obama arrive the whole world would become his whore, and the church his madam (Mt. 24:24).

Yet, there will be preserved a group called the Elect. A small, very small group upon whom Heaven will have favor and the son of Satan shall be defeated.

Search the scriptures that your eyes might be opened, and our beloved nation redeemed (2 Chronicles 7:14).

Using spiritual weapons, the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition Treason Trial drove a silver stake through his bloodless heart. Since the 18th of May in the year of our Lord 2010 the guilty verdict will demonstrate Obama shall be revealed as impotent as Hitler at his wedding to Ava Braum in that cyanide bunker beneath the streets of Berlin.

Look up now and you shall see Obama fall as lightning from the sky.
Barack Hussein Obama was found guilty of sedition, conspiracy, mail and wire fraud on 18 May 2010 in a duly authorized constitution court held at the ATLAH World Missionary Church in ATLAH, New York.
The prosecution recommends life in Guantanamo Bay without the possibility of parole. To be presented to Congress for execution in not too many days.


4 posted on 06/17/2010 9:01:38 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
The “Burden of proff” is on the prosecution. They need to prove that the order to deploy is lawful by verifying the lawfulness of Obama’s eligibility.

Actually, that's not true. If it was, then the military would have to prove the lawfulness of every single order it gave whenever someone disagreed with one.

That's why the presumption is actually that the order is lawful, and so the challenger has to prove that it isn't.

And before he can do that, he has to show that there is enough doubt to allow him to make his argument.

And before he does that, he has to show that he challenged the order in a lawful way, so that he can be allowed to show his doubt.

Personally, I think he's right. But the military is not constructed so as to make successfully challenging orders easy.

5 posted on 06/17/2010 9:27:05 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: danamco

http://sagebrushpatriot.com/america.htm


6 posted on 06/17/2010 9:42:13 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett

I’m losing faith in the human ability to reason here.


7 posted on 06/17/2010 10:57:53 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett

He has successfully corrupted and silenced the supreme court, electoral college, congress, senate, liberal and conservative media, lower courts, trial lawyers, hawaii state gov, attorney generals, state police, and the military from officer level up.

Unfortunately there is only a few of us left to resist.


8 posted on 06/18/2010 12:45:43 AM PDT by 83Vet4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u; All

“The “Burden of proff” is on the prosecution. They need to prove that the order to deploy is lawful by verifying the lawfulness of Obama’s eligibility.”

Unfortunately, military law doesn’t function that way. It is designed around the presumption that civilian authority has done its job to ensure a valid chain of command from the top down. Therefore, Dr. Lakin is being hammered by a system not designed to deal with someone of his high character, and an administration of such low character. Thus, a system of justice that works under normal conditions doesn’t work in this case. So, a good man is going down in flames.

The military system of justice is not trully flawed, the presumptions it is based upon are. I agree that Dr. Lakin is correct to question the POTUS’ NBC credentials. However, the UCMJ and its traditional implementation are not set up to deal with such questioning. This particular situation is unique in history. The fact that things have deteriorated in the following of the constitution by civil authorities has created this crisis. A person of LTC Lakin’s high character would never have challenged a sitting presidents authority IF the civilian side had done their duty to the constitution. Thus, he feels honor bound to challenge, but the military is not set up for such a challenge.

Boy....I’m writing alot and not really making much sense....time to stop.


9 posted on 06/18/2010 2:13:38 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Then, oaths are a sham.


10 posted on 06/18/2010 5:44:58 AM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Personally, I think he’s right.

Agreed — but he’s screwed.


11 posted on 06/18/2010 9:20:37 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
In "The Promise: President Obama, Year One," by Newsweek senior editor Jonathan Alter, the author recounts a series of private blow-ups -- including a particularly fiery one involving the nation's top military brass. "A presidential dressing down unlike any in the United States in more than half a century," is how Alter describes the October 2009 eruption.

In an Oval Office showdown, Obama told Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Gen. David Petraeus that he was "exceedingly unhappy" with the Pentagon's conduct, Alter reported, adding that its leaks to the press were "disrespectful of the process."

"This was a cold and bracing meeting," an attendee said of the encounter, where Obama demanded to know "here and now" if the Pentagon would be onboard with any presidential strategy.

It apparently worked: Petraeus later described himself as "chagrined," and both he and Gates "swore loyalty" to the President. Obama eventually supported a troop buildup.

WTF! -- "he [Petraeus] and Gates "swore loyalty" to the President.

WTF! -- they can't do that! -- military officers swear to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic -- military officers have no business swearing loyalty to a man -- this isn't NAZI Germany -- or is it?


12 posted on 06/18/2010 9:26:15 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . . From # 12 :

Petraeus later described himself as "chagrined," and both he and Gates "swore loyalty" to the President.

-- they can't do that! -- military officers swear to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic -- military officers have no business swearing loyalty to a man --

Then, article and # 1 - also check out # 4.

13 posted on 06/18/2010 12:19:04 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

“This was a cold and bracing meeting,” an attendee said of the encounter, where Obama demanded to know “here and now” if the Pentagon would be onboard with any presidential strategy.

It apparently worked: Petraeus later described himself as “chagrined,” and both he and Gates “swore loyalty” to the President. Obama eventually supported a troop buildup.

WHAT? FIRST I HEARD OF THIS THIS NEEDS TO BE CONFIRMED AND QUESTIONED. THIS SCARES THE CRAP OUT OF ME.


14 posted on 06/18/2010 12:23:54 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett
The military is using a court martial to force his compliance.

Compliance is no longer an option. Lakin has said he won't go. The military is using a court martial to punish him for his refusal to comply.

15 posted on 06/18/2010 12:23:57 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
They need to prove that the order to deploy is lawful by verifying the lawfulness of Obama’s eligibility.

No, they don't. The Army's charge is that Lakin refused to obey the orders of his brigade commander, not Obama. They won't have a problem proving that. Lakin, on the other hand, has to show how that officer's order were unlawful.

16 posted on 06/18/2010 12:26:02 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

This is worse than I thought.


17 posted on 06/18/2010 12:26:11 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bronkburnett; LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void

Bronkburnett, you mentioned the possibility of threats to the judges... It reminded me of the death of Lakin’s lawyers’ son.

Lucy, or others, did we ever learn anything more about his son’s death? I remember some odd circumstances, but don’t recall if anything was ever reported in regards to cause of death.

As far as threats to judges - I think anyone really paying close attention will see that there have been NUMEROUS bodies ‘piling up’ around Obama and his various nefarious dealings in Chicago. It reminds me of the Clinton Body Count, although a bit smaller because Obama just hasn’t had the time to amass the quantities of enemies the Clintons’ did. If the threats aren’t spoken, they are certainly implied at this point!! [ALL JMHO of course...]


18 posted on 06/18/2010 12:28:18 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
he has to show that he challenged the order in a lawful way, so that he can be allowed to show his doubt.

There's the rub. Will he be allowed to show his evidence?

19 posted on 06/18/2010 1:28:04 PM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 83Vet4Life
The list of grievances against George III in the Declaration of Independence sounds like Obama's "To-Do" list...

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

20 posted on 06/18/2010 1:35:08 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Lucy, or others, did we ever learn anything more about his son’s death? I remember some odd circumstances, but don’t recall if anything was ever reported in regards to cause of death.

It wasn't Lakin's lawyer, it was the son of John Hemenway, who filed a suit against Obama but who is not connected in any way with Lakin or his case. His death appears to have been ruled a suicide.

21 posted on 06/18/2010 2:12:16 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Thanks for the correction, I appreciate it.


22 posted on 06/18/2010 2:27:54 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
FIRST I HEARD OF THIS THIS NEEDS TO BE CONFIRMED AND QUESTIONED.

Just imagine, if rolling_stone hasn't heard a news item, it didn't happen -- jeez louise!

New Obama book by Newsweek senior editor Jonathan Alter airs private flares of temper -- paragraph 8.


23 posted on 06/18/2010 2:48:07 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u
The “Burden of proff” is on the prosecution. They need to prove that the order to deploy is lawful by verifying the lawfulness of Obama’s eligibility.

No, under the manual for courts martial, the burden is on the person alleging the order was unlawful. However, that person must be given the opportunity, and thus the access to information, to make that case, at trial.

24 posted on 06/18/2010 3:48:07 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Thanks for the link.

It apparently worked: Petraeus later described himself as "chagrined," and both he and Gates "swore loyalty" to the President.

I hope that is literally true, and they did not swear loyalty to Obama/Soeto/Dunham or whoever he really is.

The Constitution makes the President the commander in chief, and the military is supposed to take the lawful orders of the commander in chief. However they are not required to kiss his ash either. They serve at his pleasure and he is their commander.

The President that is. The question remains; "Is BO lawfully, that is Constitutionally, the President, or just an ineligible usurper sitting in the Oval Office and acting as president."

He's not exactly lived up to his promises of transparency on this issue, or many others for that matter.

25 posted on 06/18/2010 4:05:41 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Sorry I worded my post wrong I wasn’t questioning you but the author...Its hard to keep up with all the crap news this WH generates...


26 posted on 06/18/2010 4:06:25 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSiz49IWJH0&feature


27 posted on 06/18/2010 10:57:31 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: danamco

A year old video from Lucas Smith? What’s your point?


28 posted on 06/19/2010 5:43:45 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You know very well!!!


29 posted on 06/19/2010 8:32:54 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: danamco
You know very well!!!

Run out of new crap and are reduced to recycling the old?

30 posted on 06/20/2010 2:33:38 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson