It Begins… Plans to Evacuate Tampa Bay Are Put Into Place

Gateway Pundit ^ | 6-24-10 | Jim Hoft

[hennie pennie]

Controlled burns create toxic fumes.

[Amityschild]

Huckabee keeps talking about the FEMA head and remarking that he is quite capable. Like you, I noticed that this was the first I had heard of them in the BP story. Then I found this story dating back to May 9 and FEMA is mentioned.

http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m5d9-Gulf-oil-spill-Suggestions-of-BP-cover-up-with-Obama-Administration-on-massive-amount-of-oil-being

I don’t know if it means anything. I just found it odd.

I hate this thing. Thing = collective cluster**** that is our government and BP. The oil COULD be dealt with by intelligent people. Unfortunately, there are none involved here.

[N. Theknow]

Tampa is not on the trajectory to have OIL on their beaches. But to dismiss the oil that is in other areas in the panhandle is just ridiculous.

Not dismissing the oil in other places, just the hype for ALL of Florida's beaches being imperiled.

And Tampa is in danger of fumes from an oil burn over 200 miles away, so evacuation plans have to be hyped? There are already evac plans in place for hurricanes.

[Eye of Unk]

We should rename the Gulf of Mexico for the time being as, “The Obama Dead Sea”.

I bet a lot of people are thinking seriously of moving to Arizona about now, or worse yet my neck of the woods Alaska.

[Eye of Unk]

Oil lurks beneith sand at Pensacola beach. http://www.tampabay.com/SearchForwardServlet.do?articleId=1104804

[Kimberly GG]

“And what do you propose would be the reason behind creating an enforced evacuation of the gulf states?”

I’d say it would be rather difficult to hold elections with millions of citizens displaced. Created or not, they’ve got to have some ‘crisis’ in order to avoid elections ‘legitimately’ and thus, maintain control.