Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin and Supporters Busted - Alaska Offered to Pay Palin Legal Costs
Independent Council Report | 6-26-10 | Bob J

Posted on 06/26/2010 9:37:58 AM PDT by Bob J

One of the most flogged excuses by both Palin and her supporters for her resignation as Governor of Alaska was that ethics complaints were "bankrupting" her. But the Independent Council Report issued in conjunction with the decision on her Legal Defense Fund says otherwise.

Not only does it show the State of Alaska offered to make payments for her legal costs it shows that even bfore the election the Palin campaign was making alternate plans to not only get the McCain campaign to pay for them but to hit up the Rnc AND set up a legal defense fund.

When confronted with Palin's legal bills in relation to the ethics violations charged against her, the State of Alaska offerred to pay begin paying bills to the tune of 100k. Now this was just the start and 100k was a round number they picked. Once they made the precedent of funding her legal expenses there would have been an obligation to continue...in for a penny, in for a pound.

But Palin and her legal advisors rejected the offer based IMO in a flimsy "accounting problem". It is clear the Palin's had bigger plans for much more money and the Alaskan offer was only going to get in the way of that.

Before you start reading these snippets from the report you must be aware that the first plan of attack from the Palinistas will be to portray the Independent Investigaror as partisan, compromised and corrupt. But you must also be aware that this is the very same IC that ruled in Paln's favor over the much more serious "Troopergate" allegations.

This report is full of eye opening relevations and I will be posting reports on several of them as time goes on. Here is the relevant section on this issue from the report.

"C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

1. Certain ethics complaints and legislative inquiries were conducted involving Governor Palin during the national presidential and vice presidential campaign when Governor Palin was a candidate for Vice President of the United States.

2. A contract for legal services was issued by the State of Alaska to the law firm of Clapp, Peterson, Van Flein, Tiemesson & Thorsness to represent Governor Palin, and others, in connection with these matters, for up to $ 100,000 at public expense.

3. No invoices were submitted to the State by Mr. Van Flein's law firm, pursuant to this state contract, due to the decision by Governor Palin and her attorneys that it would be too difficult to separate the functions of representing Governor Palin in her official capacity in the pending state-related matters, and representing her in other related campaign or partisan matters beyond the scope of the state contract. Thus, to avoid an appearance of impropriety or any allegation that legal fees were being paid for legal services beyond the scope of the state contract, Van Flein's law firm and Governor Palin agreed that funding for these services would be sought from sources other than state funding.

4. Among the sources of funding discussed were the Republican National Committee and the McCain campaign. However, after the conclusion of the presidential campaign, it became apparent that funding from the McCain campaign would not be forthcoming. Governor Palin and her advisors discussed alternative sources of funding to defray the continuing costs of defending past and future Ethics Act complaints, as well as other claims that may be brought as a consequence of serving in the Governor's Office. Among the sources discussed were the Republican Governor's Association and the creation of a trust. The trust would solicit private funding to pay for the past and future defense costs of Governor Palin, and potentially her family, her aides in the Governor's Office, and potentially, future governors and state officials.

EPIC FAIL - This is going to hurt...


TOPICS: Humor; Test Topic, Ignore It
KEYWORDS: alaska; anklebiters; attentionwhore; bobj; bobj4romney; bobjattentionwhore; bobjdouchebag; bobjibtz; bobjisanidiot; bobjthetroll; bobsdroolingagain; busted; dbagbobj; demint; fallonyoursarahsword; fisters4romney; gagdadbob; hunter; johnwayne; kittychow; legalcosts; lookatmeeeee; loserbobj; lynchmobmentality; onecosmos; palin; palinistasattack; palinistasgonuts; palinzombies; pds; ridethelightening; rinobobj; troll; umakekittiesangry; vkalert; whenmittbotsattack; youlie; zotbait; zottime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-316 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2010 9:38:06 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Bob J

I thought this was some kind of leftist hitpiece. This is yours??


3 posted on 06/26/2010 9:41:21 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

REALLY generic name and no link. Source please?????


4 posted on 06/26/2010 9:41:33 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Sarah plays chess while they play checkers.


5 posted on 06/26/2010 9:41:52 AM PDT by JPG (Mr. Gore, or is it Mr. Stone or Mr. Woody? Whatever, you're under arrest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Oh put a sock in it.


6 posted on 06/26/2010 9:41:52 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

what...bad legal advice???


7 posted on 06/26/2010 9:42:17 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skip Away
Sara said it was not fair for the Alaska tax payers to pay for the frivolous law suits. She took it on on her own. Can you imagine the law suits form the idiots if the state gave her money outside the law?
8 posted on 06/26/2010 9:42:42 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Did your hero Johnny Sutton tell you this too?


9 posted on 06/26/2010 9:42:58 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

This obsession of his has gotten really old and tiresome.


10 posted on 06/26/2010 9:42:58 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I don’t think she was able to focus on her job because of all the distractions of legal complaints against her.


11 posted on 06/26/2010 9:43:52 AM PDT by jerri (Is it over yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

And your point is what, exactly?

Are you trying to deny that the Left has been harassing Sarah Palin with nonsensical ethics complaints? Are you attacking her for writing a book or giving speeches for money?


12 posted on 06/26/2010 9:44:01 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

When you say “The State of Alaska” offered to pay, what does that mean? Attorney General, state legislature?


13 posted on 06/26/2010 9:44:03 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

IBTZ!


14 posted on 06/26/2010 9:44:03 AM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

None of this is of any real import. It will be blown out of proportion and made out to be more than what it really is or was, just as you insinuate, but in the end, her supporters don’t care, and by the time Obama is finished trying to cover up the even-larger schemes he’s been involved with, won’t amount to a hill of beans.....nice try.


15 posted on 06/26/2010 9:44:12 AM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; Skip Away; xzins
A contract for legal services was issued by the State of Alaska to the law firm of Clapp, Peterson, Van Flein, Tiemesson & Thorsness to represent Governor Palin, and others, in connection with these matters, for up to $100,000 at public expense.

Considering her legal bills were expected to exceed $500,000, I don't think this is quite the smoking gun all you Palin haters were hoping for.

16 posted on 06/26/2010 9:44:21 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Was that $100K offered for EACH charge filed? Sarah made it clear, early on, that she didn’t want the Alaskan taxpayer to have to pick up the tab for her defense. And when all was said and done, with each of the ethics charges filed, the total was much MORE than $100K.


17 posted on 06/26/2010 9:44:55 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Sara said it was not fair for the Alaska tax payers to pay for the frivolous law suits. She took it on on her own. Can you imagine the law suits form the idiots if the state gave her money outside the law?

Exactly!

18 posted on 06/26/2010 9:45:45 AM PDT by jerri (Is it over yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
If I read this correctly, you are saying Palin resigned her office to save the Taxpayers of Alaska hundreds of thousands of dollars defending her from false accusations.

Man, she is evil. /s

19 posted on 06/26/2010 9:46:15 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Obama, proving Hillary right that it takes a Village Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Sarah Palin resigned to save Alaska the trouble and expense of all those nuisance suits and complaints. She never discussed personal bankruptcy.

This article by "Bob J" just verifies that.

20 posted on 06/26/2010 9:47:25 AM PDT by eCSMaster (He promised hope; he gave us hype. He promised change; he gave us chains!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson