Yeah, and if I disagree with what you have to say I am infringing upon your First Amendment rights!/s
I didn't, by pointing out what a sick and twisted sorry excuse for a man Mel is, advocate lynching the guy.
But based upon his past words and deeds, these tapes do not seem at all out of character.
Nor do I think that Robyn Gibson is a disinterested party in the eventual payout to the Gold-digger; which was my point of entry to this thread.
posted on 07/15/2010 2:49:50 PM PDT
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
To: allmendream; NoControllingLegalAuthority
Nor do I think that Robyn Gibson is a disinterested party in the eventual payout to the Gold-digger;
Robyn Gibson already has her money. It's set aside. $400 mil. The divorce is final this month. If you think hard enough, you may be able to smear a very respected lady some more.
posted on 07/15/2010 2:55:39 PM PDT
by DJ MacWoW
(If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson