Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Stanford University law professor Robert Weisberg said Grigorieva would have to prove that her intention at the time of the recording was to eventually assist police — not, say, to sell the audio for profit.
1 posted on 07/16/2010 5:10:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

The doctored/edited annoying bipolar ravings of demented Mel will never be admissible in a California court.


2 posted on 07/16/2010 5:13:15 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember ("Subtlety is not going to win this fight": NJ Governor Chris Christie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
This site Apparently Shows the Photo Of Oksana After She Says Mel Gibson Punched Her In The Mouth
3 posted on 07/16/2010 5:13:44 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

ahhhhh that’s why she’s saying she didn’t pass on the tape to the media.....


5 posted on 07/16/2010 5:15:01 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The two party consent only applies to “confidential conversations”. Whether it was confidential or not depends on the intent of the parties at the time of the conversation. By the way public employeees doing their job don’t notmally have an expectation of privacy- that their conversations are confidential.(few exceptions, doctor, lawyer)

California Cal. Penal Code § 632(a) Statute prohibits the recording of confidential communications without “the consent of all parties.” Evidence obtained in violation of this section may not be used in any judicial proceeding. This prohibition is confined to confidential communications, defined by statute as “any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties there to,” but does not include communications made under any “circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.”


11 posted on 07/16/2010 5:31:59 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The ones that will pay the biggest price for this is the 8 kids.


19 posted on 07/16/2010 6:49:26 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"If she falls in that exception, then [the] recording is, in fact, admissible," Gorin said.

If she fell into that exception, but she can't use the recording to create the exception.
23 posted on 07/17/2010 3:15:47 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson