Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battle Of Britain, 70 Years Ago - Stunning Pics
http://gigapica.geenstijl.nl/2010/07/the_battle_of_britain.html ^ | July 19, 2010

Posted on 07/19/2010 2:18:51 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton

So, not much text necessary... enjoy, think, and remember!


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: battle; battleofbritain; britain; churchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-83 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2010 2:18:55 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Nice Pictures


2 posted on 07/19/2010 2:23:36 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

bfl


3 posted on 07/19/2010 2:31:45 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.

The Battle of Britian was a major setback for Germany and the Luftwaffe. The Luftwaffe was doing a good job of rolling up the RAF in the south of England, prepatory to a channel crossing. Hitler was outraged by a few pinprick raids by the RAF against German cities and demanded that the Luftwaffe switch targets to British cities. This was the decision that cost the battle. An ME-109 operating out of France only had enough fuel to fly to London and operate for five minutes. Many Luftwaffe fighter pilots were lost because they ditched in the channel on the way home. The Luftwaffe never recovered. Towards the end of the war, many German fighter pilots were flying into combat with too few hours to be allowed to solo in the U.S. Army Air Force.

BTW, German radar was (far) technically superior to the Chain Home system, contrary to popular belief. Where the British had an advantage was in better incorporating radar data into an overall real time picture of the battle, giving their commanders better situational awareness.


4 posted on 07/19/2010 2:36:41 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Thanks, nice addition!


5 posted on 07/19/2010 2:38:22 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Great. All I see are little red x’s.


6 posted on 07/19/2010 2:52:01 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The Battle of Britian was a major setback for Germany and the Luftwaffe. The Luftwaffe was doing a good job of rolling up the RAF in the south of England, prepatory to a channel crossing. Hitler was outraged by a few pinprick raids by the RAF against German cities and demanded that the Luftwaffe switch targets to British cities. This was the decision that cost the battle. An ME-109 operating out of France only had enough fuel to fly to London and operate for five minutes. Many Luftwaffe fighter pilots were lost because they ditched in the channel on the way home. The Luftwaffe never recovered. Towards the end of the war, many German fighter pilots were flying into combat with too few hours to be allowed to solo in the U.S. Army Air Force.

BTW, German radar was (far) technically superior to the Chain Home system, contrary to popular belief. Where the British had an advantage was in better incorporating radar data into an overall real time picture of the battle, giving their commanders better situational awareness.

Thanks, Lonesome. Your excellent little summary goes great with these amazing photos.
7 posted on 07/19/2010 2:59:08 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

The plane going of Lord Nelson statue in Trafalgar Square demonstrates the stark closeness of the battle over London.

I attended an air show near Oxford at the American Air Museum nearby complete with mock dogfight.

Area looks very much like it did during the war. It was very eerie.


8 posted on 07/19/2010 2:59:42 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Need work. MBA, CPA, Black Belt. Diverse industry and cross border experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

I’m sorry! Others, and I myself can see them, obviously. Can’t think of any reason why you can’t.


9 posted on 07/19/2010 3:00:47 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

It’s not your fault. Must be something on my end. I’m a WWII buff and would like to see them.


10 posted on 07/19/2010 3:02:24 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
Battle of Britain pilot: 'You were thankful to be alive'
11 posted on 07/19/2010 3:18:06 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Men like this are hard to find in England today. The place has largely surrendered to the Muslims.


12 posted on 07/19/2010 3:22:41 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

*


13 posted on 07/19/2010 3:24:26 AM PDT by Calusa (The pump won't prime 'cause the vandals took the handle. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
The Battle of Britain: a chronology in pictures
14 posted on 07/19/2010 3:32:24 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
If before Sunday's match parts of the media represented it as a re-run of the Battle of Britain, it is hardly surprising that some people should have responded as though our country had lost a major battle, when, in fact, England has simply been beaten by Germany in a football game.
15 posted on 07/19/2010 3:34:58 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Very interesting. The author raises some important points, and highlights a few paradoxes that are worth thinking about.

Is it good or bad that so much emotion went into that match?

I myself, being 51 years of age, see younger people being almost frighteningly emotional about a mere game of soccer. But that is my perception. I need to remind myself that someone aged 20 nowadays may not even have grandparents anymore that can relate stories on their experience of the War.

Whereas my own mom and dad, both luckily still alive, were children during wartime. They know what hearing bomber planes is, what being relocated to an entirely different part of the country is (because the Nazi’s confiscated their parental homes), and what hunger is - they were obliged to eat tulip ‘balls’ (sorry, don’t know the word for the onion-shaped thing here...), because there was no real food at all. The word ‘hongerwinter’ still installs fearful memories in many, many old Dutch folks.

I think the behaviour and feelings of young soccer fans reflects their (relative) lack of direct experience with a real war.

Is that good? Well, bad it ain’t, because you don’t wish war on anyone innocent, of course.

Moot point.


16 posted on 07/19/2010 4:05:35 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Good post. The word you’re looking for is Tulip bulbs.


17 posted on 07/19/2010 4:13:31 AM PDT by agere_contra (Obama did more damage to the Gulf economy in one day than Pemex/Ixtoc did in nine months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Battle of Britain photos you might enjoy ping.


18 posted on 07/19/2010 4:16:01 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
I think the British were very lucky they had enough quantities of the Supermarine Spitfire to defend their country during the Battle of Britain. If the Brits were only dependent on the Hurricane they would have been slaughtered, since the Hurricane--while an excellent gun platform that proved viable against bombers--was eventually no match against the 30-40 mph faster Bf-109E's that opposed them
19 posted on 07/19/2010 4:17:01 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
Anyone who wants a perspective on what the air campaign cost Great Britain need only look at the photo below. It's a picture of Wing Commander Guy Gibson and his crew just before his 'dambuster' raid in 1943. They were a picked crew and were broken up shortly after the mission and sent to other squadrons. Every single one of them was killed in action.

Photobucket

20 posted on 07/19/2010 4:19:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Well said and a very good analogy. Lack of experience in worldly matters indeed contributing to an excess of zeal misplaced.


21 posted on 07/19/2010 4:20:50 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

There was a German pilot that got a bit confused on directions and landed on a British air-strip

Wonder if was that one lined up with those Spitfires in those pics

Pretty good gift


22 posted on 07/19/2010 4:41:24 AM PDT by Harold Shea (RVN `70 - `71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

I just went searching for one of the opening scenes from the movie.....spitfire low level pass.....*smiles*...thought for sure I could find it...


23 posted on 07/19/2010 4:57:36 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
BTW, German radar was (far) technically superior to the Chain Home system, contrary to popular belief.

Green Beach is a book about Brits going to France and trying to learn about German radar. The British radar technician had a soldier with him that had one job...to kill the technician before he was captured by the Germans.

24 posted on 07/19/2010 5:08:38 AM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Before I read your caption, I glanced at the picture and wondered how many of them ‘came home’....


25 posted on 07/19/2010 5:08:57 AM PDT by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
nice set of clips of spitfires having fun with spectators on a hilltop...*smiles*
26 posted on 07/19/2010 5:09:12 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI8o41nZWhk


27 posted on 07/19/2010 5:09:34 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Great Pictures...Thanks.


28 posted on 07/19/2010 5:12:58 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
On the contrary, while the Hurricane was used primarily against bombers, they had a tighter turning radius then either the spitfire or the ME109, they were more agile and they shot down many ME109s and luftwaffe pilots considered it a disgrace to be shot down by a hurricane. Hurricanes shot down more enemy planes than spitfires. They were also very robust and could take more hits than a spitfire and keep flying.

Just the opposite of your statement is true: If it hadn't been for the Hurricanes numbers Britain would have been lost.

29 posted on 07/19/2010 5:19:47 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

There’s an old Len Deighton novel titled “Bomber” which is the fictional story of an RAF raid over Germany. If you have a chance to find a copy I highly recommend it. Get past the personal crap in the first chapter or two and it’s a riviting story of what it must have been like for the men doing the flying. And they did it mission after mission.


30 posted on 07/19/2010 5:20:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Harold Shea

That was a Stuka dive bomber and I wondered about that one also!:)


31 posted on 07/19/2010 5:21:34 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
Best series I ever saw to portray The Battle of Britain, A Piece of Cake.

Their musical score should have won awards.

Check out one minute into video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QVZ4W_2Iec&feature=related

32 posted on 07/19/2010 5:28:25 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QVZ4W_2Iec&feature=related


33 posted on 07/19/2010 5:28:53 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

A brief history lesson on the Spitfire, he he

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvDDDKnNhuE

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


34 posted on 07/19/2010 5:29:58 AM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

thanks for the pics. I shudder to think how Britian might react today to annihlation. Are there enough patriotic men and women to stand up to tyranny today or would they meekly go quietly into servitude? I can’t answer that question myself but I shudder to think what the answer is...


35 posted on 07/19/2010 5:30:45 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton; All

Great pictures. Thanks for posting. Thanks to all posters on this educational thread.


36 posted on 07/19/2010 5:32:16 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alfa6

..been on my favorites list since 2008


37 posted on 07/19/2010 5:32:56 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

bump for later


38 posted on 07/19/2010 5:41:34 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
"Repeat please."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXf1bhEEXd0

39 posted on 07/19/2010 5:44:49 AM PDT by OKSooner ("Don't let making a living prevent you from making a life." - Coach John Wooden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Thanks, much appreciated.


40 posted on 07/19/2010 5:54:41 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

The Brits leapfrogged the Germans (and everybody else) by inventing the multicavity magnetron. This made microwave radar possible. German sets were still UHF and VHF (Chain Home was ridiculously long wave HF. Yet it was just good enough.) While the Germans and Japanese eventually produced limited number of microwave sets, they never produced them in the numbers that the Allies did.

When the Tizard commission carrying the latest British scientific inventions arrived in the U.S. by ship, they landed first in Boston, where they were greeted by Roosevelt’s scientific advisor Vannevar Bush. (No relation to Prescott or the George’s.) Bush, just happened to be a founding director of Raytheon Company. He showed the multicavity magnetron to Percy Spencer, later famous as the inventor of the microwave oven (in 1947!). Although the British scientist who carried the tube over from England had kept it in a case chained to his arm, Spencer took it home to play with. The next day he proposed that instead of machining it out of a solid piece of copper, he could produce them by stamping sheets of copper, bolting them together and then machining out the inner surface of the resonant cavity. In the event Raytheon went on to produce over half of all the magnetrons made during World War II.

Airborne surface search radar turned the tide in the Battle of the Atlantic. In this role, cheap microwave radar was a truly a war winning invention. The U.S. spent more money developing radar during the war than it did on the Manhattan Project. It has truly been said, that while the atomic bomb ended the War, radar won it.


41 posted on 07/19/2010 6:07:14 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Plus the breaking of the German and Japanese ciphers.


42 posted on 07/19/2010 6:40:36 AM PDT by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus
Radar often provided a decisive tactical advantaged, especially in the Battle of the Atlantic. Doenitz insistence that U-Boats surface and send in their location every night was a godsend to the Allies. Even without decryption, HUFF-DUFF (High frequency direction finding) gave the allies a fix on every single U-Boat, the encrypted coordinates, when available, only made it better.

ENIGMA gave no warning the the Ardennes Offensive. While the Germans enforced strict radio silence, possibly to thwart traffic analysis, perhaps they smelled a rat, Allied commanders had become too reliant on ENIGMA giving them the German order of battle. Radar did come through, even in the Bulge. The Army had anti-personnel artillery shells with radar altimeter fuzes. They had kept them back lest the Germans reverse engineer duds and use them on us. Their use was first authorized during the Bulge. The effect, both tactical and psychological was devastating. Some German infantry units mutinied. Patton was so aghast that he thought they should be outlawed by international treaty, like gas and germ warfare.

43 posted on 07/19/2010 7:10:56 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: alfa6

I figured you has seen it but just in case.

I showed that to a co-worker at work a while back, he was an engine mech on C-124s and A-1s way back yonder and he almost dived under his desk:-)

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


44 posted on 07/19/2010 7:16:02 AM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
With the amount of time the R.A.F. was involved in WWII, they seem to have relatively few really high-scoring aces (20+ victories, let's say) as compared to Germany. I know the Germans flew their pilots until they dropped; did the R.A.F. rotate their pilots out of service after a certain number of missions?

Please don't misunderstand my question as disrespectful to the R.A.F. or their contributions in WWII.

45 posted on 07/19/2010 7:31:21 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This
I know the Germans flew their pilots until they dropped; did the R.A.F. rotate their pilots out of service after a certain number of missions?

Different sorts of war, I think. After the Battle of Britain, the Germans spent a lot of their air power defending against Allied bombing raids; and they also used their airpower extensively on the Eastern Front against the Russians.

The RAF fighters were more fully engaged in North Africa and the Mediterranean, and I think there was less air-to-air combat there.

46 posted on 07/19/2010 7:41:45 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This
"With the amount of time the R.A.F. was involved in WWII, they seem to have relatively few really high-scoring aces (20+ victories, let's say) as compared to Germany. I know the Germans flew their pilots until they dropped; did the R.A.F. rotate their pilots out of service after a certain number of missions?"

I think the numbers are skewed primarily because a lot of German aces made their bones early in the war against the air forces of nations flying obsolete aircraft with marginally trained pilots (i.e. France, USSR, Poland, etc.) For example the German "Ace of Aces", Erich Hartmann is recorded as having 352 aerial victories. 345 of these were against the Soviets.

47 posted on 07/19/2010 7:45:58 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"For example the German "Ace of Aces", Erich Hartmann is recorded as having 352 aerial victories. 345 of these were against the Soviets."

Thank you for the info. I knew Hartmann fought on both fronts, but I didn't realize the balance was that skewed.

48 posted on 07/19/2010 8:02:04 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton
The best RAF Squardron

No. 303 (Kosciuszko) Polish Fighter Squadron

49 posted on 07/19/2010 8:08:31 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

Wouldn’t know, sorry. But there are some WWII experts in this thread, perhaps someone can answer?

And: I think your question makes eminent sense. I’d like to know the answer too... it doesn’t show any disrespect at all, by the way.


50 posted on 07/19/2010 8:11:58 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson