|This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.|
|Locked on 08/04/2010 2:02:16 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:|
Skip to comments.Drudge Healine:CA Prop 8 held to be unconstitutional under due process and equal protection.
Posted on 08/04/2010 1:47:06 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Judge strikes down 'Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California'...
JUDGE: Having considered the trial evidence and the arguments of counsel, the court pursuant to FRCP 52(a) finds that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional and that its enforcement must be enjoined.
That BAD ruling must not stand.
A gay man is free to marry a woman, just like a straight man.
I don’t see the discrimination.
So sad.....May GOD have mercy on a sinful world..May his truth prevail..
MARRAIGE is 1 MAN and 1 WOMAN!!
It was reported on the radio this morning that the judge is a homosexual.
Why do we even bother having elections anymore?
TRANSLATION: Who the hell do the PEOPLE think they ARE, trying to overrule the will of the left??!!!
IOW the judge made a legal determination that homosexuals are “born that way”.
Like we didn’t see that result coming.
Get a liberal law degree.
Constitution? We don’t need no stinkin’ constitution.
It’s your thang....do whatcha want to do.
What’s the difference between a California judge and a septic tank?
The tank can be cleaned.
The left keeps this up, they will lose over 50 seats come November.
so how fast can a notice of appeal be filed and how fast can an injuction at the 9th be sought?
Democrats, the party of “gay”.
Wow, she’s gifted. Wonderfully gifted.
Well dang! I can marry my horse now! Or my pig. The sky’s the limit! /s/
Then the outcome was a forgone conclusion. The judge should have rightfully recused the case. The ruling on equal protection and due process? Activist judges need to be impeached and removed.
when elections do not work, revolution is next.
It was fun while it lasted...............
Judge said quote: ‘Proposition 8 places the force of law behind stigmas against gays and lesbians’...
NOW CAN WE HAVE THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT?
NOW WILL JOHN MCCAIN SAY HE SUPPORTS IT?
Yeah! If boobs were brains, she’d be like....Einstein!
The Ruling Class speaks. You shall obey.
So let me get this straight. I went to the polls..voted Yes on Prop 8, now my vote doesn’t even matter. Good to know
That BAD ruling must not stand.
There’s a lot of that going around (speaking as an resident of Arizona).
IOW the federal judge engaged in abuse of discretion.
He allowed his PERSONAL fetish to decide this case.
“A gay man is free to marry a woman, just like a straight man.”
...and apparently, a straight man is now free to marry a man, just like a gay man.
I would like to meet the person who can craft a plausible argument about how an animal that cannot sign a contract can enter into one.
Those are easily 1/2 her total body weight. Just think of the strength of her back muscles. For her to walk upright is something like the bumble bee being able to fly.
Voting in name only in California.
What does it matter how the people vote on anything here?
So now what?
Where the hell do we go from here?
Who cares if she has brains?
I say no marriage at all and sex on demand from all beautiful female celebrities
But the girls right behind her seem to have passed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.