Skip to comments.After 107 years in Milwaukee, Harley-Davidson could leave
Posted on 08/04/2010 2:09:43 PM PDT by Justaham
It's the roar that made Milwaukee famous the distinctive throaty rumble of a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. But that much-loved racket could be rumbling away to another state if the company cannot bring down its labor costs.
Harley-Davidson warned employees in April that it will move its Wisconsin manufacturing operations elsewhere if it cannot cut millions of dollars at the factories that build the bikes known as "Milwaukee Iron."
Harley's corporate headquarters would remain here, but that's small consolation to a community that has already endured repeated blows to its civic identity.
Loading stock quotes Index Last Change HOG 27.84 +0.45 +1.64% Quotes delayed 15+ min. "When you think of Milwaukee you think of beer, brats and Harley-Davidson," said Steve Daily, a researcher at the Milwaukee County Historical Society. "Right or wrong, that's what it is."
But that's been changing. For example, the corporate parent of beer giant Miller parent moved its U.S. headquarters to Chicago in 2008 after joining its domestic operations with Molson Coors Brewing Co. Then there was Schlitz, which billed itself as "the beer that made Milwaukee famous" until financial and labor problems forced it to sell out to a Detroit company in the 1980s.
That leaves Harley-Davidson Inc. as the city's lone signature brand. It's also a magnet for tourists, many of whom want to visit the factories where Harley engines are made.
"We get asked frequently where the plants are," said Paul Upchurch, the president of the VISIT Milwaukee tourism bureau. "A lot of people around the world associate Milwaukee with the home of Harley."
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
right to work state?
Bring it to Texas like Caterpillar did. No income tax, right to work and business friendly climate.
Texas. No better state for a harley factory.
“Labor costs” is cost for Union intransigence.
They should move to Sturgis, it’d be a great PR move and save everyone a drive.
I’m pretty sure the California can be ruled out.
India might be a good place to move. or South Korea.
Change their mission statement to become a yacht builder, then move to Rhode Island.
Seriesly, didn’t I see a Harley plant whilst touring Pennsylvania a few years back?
They were just talking about moving some production to Tennessee (right to work state) but I believe it went to Conn?
We can’t get rid of “Diamond Jim” fast enough. The damage is really deep, while we could make a comeback it will be hard. We need some strong business minded people to run our state create some low tax enterprise zones and give the corporations some new credits to encourage a return to the land of cheese. The only good news is we’re working real hard to retire Russ in the senate....old uncle Herb is next.
(Company spokesman Bob Klein said Harley wants to remain faithful, but its production schedule needs to be more closely aligned with seasonal demand, a change that would require approval from labor unions.)
Of course, the writer had to wait to literally the last two words of the article to mention the labor unions, although, they are probably the most important aspect of Harley’s decision.
“Harley Moves Offshore to India and Japan.”
That’s OK - Milwaukeean’s (?) can always work for the Gov’t or the SEIU
Agree..... Btw what will if anything this card check crap do to us here in Texas. Will right to work trump the federal version Peeelosy wants to pass ?
I could say the same about Daytona, Plus Daytona actually has some folks living there. Ya ever been to Sturgis when the Ralley isn’t ongoing?
Diebold faced the same problem in Canton, Ohio.
They now make Diebold stuff in Mexico and the unions be damned. And Canton now has folks formerly making 25 and hour delivering newspapers and pizzas.
Good question. Dunno.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.