To: PA-RIVER
"
This is heading straight to the Supreme Court. We now have a man with injury, and his Judge is denying him access to evidence that could clear him because it would be a political embarrassment. Clearly, this is now an injustice that needs prompt remedy."
That's right (after he's exhausted the military court route). Question then becomes...will SCOTUS continue to evade the issue.
84 posted on
09/02/2010 12:30:27 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid; Red Steel
When this gets to SCOTUS, if they agree to hear it (if they don’t, that’s a whole ‘nother stinking pile of expletive), would there be a mechanism to get Kagin and Sotomayor to recuse themselves?
Anyone know?
196 posted on
09/02/2010 2:39:08 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: rxsid; PA-RIVER
Question then becomes...will SCOTUS continue to evade the issue. I'm afraid the answer here is yes too. WHY???
They are appointed for life and have NOTHING to loose by being on the "EVASIVE" and "safe"(?) side of the playing field
328 posted on
09/03/2010 9:10:52 AM PDT by
danamco
(")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson