Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steven Seagal Lawman
AETV.com - A & E ^ | unknown | n/a

Posted on 10/06/2010 8:35:36 PM PDT by Cindy

SNIPPET: "His movies have grossed more than $2 billion worldwide. He is an expert martial artist with a 7th-degree black belt in Aikido. He's considered to be in the same class of action hero as Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger. However, Steven Seagal isn't just an action hero in the movies. For almost 20 years, Seagal has been working as a fully commissioned deputy with the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office in Louisiana. In addition to going out on patrol, Seagal is an expert marksman who has worked with their SWAT team and has instructed Jefferson Parish officers in firearms and hand-to-hand combat.

Steven Seagal Lawman will allow fans to ride shotgun with Seagal as he and his hand-selected elite team of deputies respond to crimes in progress."

(Excerpt) Read more at aetv.com ...


TOPICS: Education; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: buddhism; buddhist; seagal; stevenseagal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2010 8:35:40 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Vanity/trivia post.

I watch a lot Seagal movies, but hadn’t seen this series until tonight when flipping channels.


2 posted on 10/06/2010 8:36:44 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Statement by H.H. Penor Rinpoche
Regarding the Recognition of Steven Seagal
as a Reincarnation of the Treasure Revealer
Chungdrag Dorje of Palyul Monastery

In February of 1997 I recognized my student, Steven Seagal, as a reincarnation (tulku) of the treasure revealer Chungdrag Dorje. Since there has been some confusion and uncertainty as to what this means, I am writing to clarify this situation.

Traditionally a tulku is considered to be a reincarnation of a Buddhist master who, out of his or her compassion for the suffering of sentient beings, has vowed to take rebirth to help all beings attain enlightenment. To fulfill this aspiration, a tulku will generally need to go through the complete process of recognition, enthronement and training.

Formal recognition generally occurs soon after a tulku has been identified, but only after other important lineage masters have been consulted. The newly identified tulku does not take on any formal responsibilities at the time of recognition.

The next step of enthronement may or may not occur for a tulku, depending on the circumstances. Enthronement formally invests the tulku with the responsibility of furthering the activities associated with their particular tulku lineage. Thus, if there are specific teachings and practice traditions associated with their lineage, and if there are perhaps monks, nuns, monasteries, retreat centers, lay communities and so forth for which the tulku traditionally takes responsibility, then the tulku is formally vested with those responsibilities at the time of enthronement. In the event that an enthronement ceremony is conducted, it may take place soon after recognition or some years later. If the tulku is too young to assume their responsibilities upon enthronement, others may be entrusted to take on those responsibilities until the tulku is ready.

Finally, a tulku needs to complete a formal course of training which includes years of study and meditation. This training reawakens the tulku’s powers of insight and compassion and develops their skillful means for helping others. It is only after such training that a tulku is ready to take on the role of a teacher.

In the case of Steven Seagal, he has been formally recognized as a tulku, but has not been officially enthroned. He has also not undergone the lengthy process of study and practice necessary to fully realize what I view as his potential for helping others. When I first met him, I felt he had the special qualities of a tulku within him. According to the Great Vehicle (Mahayana) of the Buddhist tradition, all beings have within them the potential for becoming Buddhas. With Steven Seagal I perceived this potential to be particularly strong as accords with being a tulku. In the past, whenever I have met someone that I feel is a tulku, I have always consulted with other masters of the Nyingma lineage such as Dudjom Rinpoche, Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche and other senior lineage holders. Similarly, after my experience of meeting Steven Seagal, I consulted with another important Nyingma master and with his concurrence, recognized Steven Seagal as a tulku.

With regard to the particular circumstances of Steven Seagal’s recognition, while it is generally the case that tulkus are recognized young in life, this is not always so. For example, the great master Jamyang Khyentse Chökyi Lodrö remained unrecognized for many years while he was an ordained monk at Kathok Monastery. He was over 30 years old, perhaps 35, and had completed his monastic education when he was recognized and enthroned as the first reincarnation of Jamyang Khyentse Chökyi Wangpo. In his case, he had devoted his life to study and practice and was thus prepared for taking on the full responsibilities of being a tulku at the time of his recognition.

Prior to my recognition of Steven Seagal I myself recognized another tulku late in his life. Kalsang Yeshe Rinpoche, a monk originally from the Palyul branch monastery of Shibo in Tibet and later at Namdroling Monastery in India, was recognized and enthroned in 1983 at the age of 51. He too had spent his life studying Buddhism and meditating before he was recognized as a tulku. Because he had cultivated his potential through many years of diligent study and meditation, he was able to become a teacher and is currently the head of our Palyul Center in Singapore. So, in short, in the Tibetan tradition there is nothing unusual about recognizing a tulku late in their life. In fact, the recognition of a tulku who has been born in the West is especially likely to occur later in their lifetime because it will generally take much longer for all the conditions that are necessary for such a recognition to come together.

Steven Seagal has been recognized as a reincarnation of the 17th century hidden treasure revealer (tertön) Chungdrag Dorje (khyung brag rdo rje) of Palyul Monastery. Chungdrag Dorje founded a small monastery called Gegön Gompa near his native village of Phene in the Kutse area of Derge in Eastern Tibet. Though there are no monks there now, the small monastery building still exists and is well known in the area for its beautiful religious wall paintings.

As a tertön, Chungdrag Dorje rediscovered teachings and sacred objects hidden by Padmasambhava in the eighth century. Such treasures (terma) were concealed with the intention that they would be discovered and revealed at a later date when the circumstances were such that they would be of particular benefit to sentient beings. Texts of the teachings discovered by Chungdrag Dorje have apparently not survived the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Sacred objects discovered by Chungdrag Dorje include an unusually shaped bell, a phurba (ritual dagger), the syllable ‘A’ carved in stone and pigments used to create the sacred wall paintings in his monastery mentioned above. Several of these objects have been preserved and are still kept at Palyul Monastery today.

In the Nyingma tradition it is said that there are a hundred main treasure revealers and an even greater number of secondary treasure revealers. Among the latter it is not uncommon for the line of their teachings to eventually lapse. Though they were beneficial during the time they flourished, for various reasons some tertön teaching lineages have ceased. This would seem to be the case with Chungdrag Dorje.

Now with regard to Steven Seagal, he was born centuries after the death of Chungdrag Dorje. It is not uncommon for there to be a lengthy span of time between the death of a master and the appearance of his or her subsequent reincarnation. My own tulku lineage is an example of this. There was a 130 years hiatus between the death of the First Pema Norbu in 1757 and the birth of the Second Pema Norbu in 1887. This is common in all the traditions of Tibetan Buddhism. As for how these gaps come about, while tulkus are understood to have vowed to be continually reborn to help beings, it is not necessary for them to take rebirth in a continuous sequence of lives in this world. It is believed that they can be reborn in other world systems where they continue their compassionate activities, returning only later to this world system. This is how such lapses in tulku lineages are understood in Tibet.

As for Steven Seagal’s movie career, my concern is with the qualities I experienced within him which relate to his potential for benefiting others and not with the conventional details of his life which are wholly secondary. Some people think that because Steven Seagal is always acting in violent movies, how can he be a true Buddhist? Such movies are for temporary entertainment and do not relate to what is real and important. It is the view of the Great Vehicle of Buddhism that compassionate beings take rebirth in all walks of life to help others. Any life condition can be used to serve beings and thus, from this point of view, it is possible to be both a popular movie star and a tulku. There is no inherent contradiction in this possibility.

As the head of the Palyul lineage of the Nyingma School and more recently as the Head of the Nyingma tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, I have had the responsibility of recognizing numerous tulkus. The first time I recognized a tulku, I was ten years old. This tulku was the incarnation of the great Khenpo Ngaga. He is still living in Eastern Tibet and continues to strive, to this day, to promote the welfare of others. Since that time until now I have recognized over one hundred tulkus. In addition I have overseen the training and enthronement of over thirty khenpos (learned scholars) and I am responsible for the welfare of the many thousands of monks belonging to the Palyul tradition. My concern in seeking to nurture these tulkus, khenpos, monks, as well as sincere lay people, has been to benefit all sentient beings. It is out of this intention that I have recognized tulkus in the past and will continue to recognize them in the future as appropriate.

In the case of my student Steven Seagal, I initiated the decision to recognize him as a tulku based on my own feelings about him. Neither I nor any of my monasteries have received or sought any sort of substantial donation from him. What is important to me are the qualities I have seen in my student. For this reason I feel confident that recognizing him as a tulku will be of benefit to others as well as to the Buddha dharma.

Whenever there is a new incarnation born or recognized, I personally feel very happy because it is like you have one more brother or sister. I take delight in such occasions as they seek to further compassionate activity for others. Being recognized as a tulku is an acknowledgment of one’s potential to help others. Such recognition does not mean that one is already a realized teacher. The degree to which tulkus have been able to actualize and utilize their potential depends upon how they have been able to use their past circumstances and how they currently use their present circumstances to develop their potential. Each tulku must work to develop themselves to the best of their ability. The essential point is that a tulku should strive to help others in whatever life situation they find themselves. It is out of such an aspiration to help all sentient beings that I have recognized many tulkus in my life and it is with this motivation that I recognized Steven Seagal as a tulku. If all beings seek to have this motivation, what need will there be for controversies and confusion over the motivations of others?


3 posted on 10/06/2010 8:39:05 PM PDT by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

I never watch Seagal movies - tonight is the first time I’ve seen this show - I did not know that he has been a law enforcement officer for 20 years! I have to say that the show has been very interesting though, and I’ve enjoyed watching it.


4 posted on 10/06/2010 8:40:47 PM PDT by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

There is something about him that is just deliciously cheesy. I have to watch, I can’t look away.


5 posted on 10/06/2010 8:42:21 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Take Sensei is at it again.... Oy vey...


6 posted on 10/06/2010 8:44:00 PM PDT by montyspython
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Take Sensei is at it again.... Oy vey...


7 posted on 10/06/2010 8:44:00 PM PDT by montyspython
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

8 posted on 10/06/2010 8:46:14 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby (Truth is called hate by those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

For those who have never seen a Steven Seagal movie, in my opinion, the best is “Out for a Kill.”


9 posted on 10/06/2010 8:46:56 PM PDT by looois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

By the looks of it, he’s got the donut eating part down pat.


10 posted on 10/06/2010 8:50:09 PM PDT by sleddogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

I actually like Segal, though there’s no doubt he plays the tough guy image for all that it’s worth.

I realized how much he overplayed it several years back when I read that whenever his Doberman got too noisy in the yard, he would go out, stick his face right up to the dog’s snarling mouth and yell, “Shut up.”

I was impressed until I got a Dobie of my own. I then learned that he could have grabbed the dog in a choke hold and tossed him to the ground, and it wouldn’t have reacted in any other way than to wag its tale, or stare up in bemusement. I came to realize that Dobies are almost incapable of harming their owners. Their sense of loyalty is beyond anything most people will ever have the joy of witnessing.

Not to drag this out, but when my Baron was about 130 pounds, he got attacked by a feral cat. When the cat took off, I didn’t want him to run it down and kill it, so I tackled Baron from behind and wrestled him to the ground. His reaction? He wagged his tail and wanted to play.


11 posted on 10/06/2010 8:50:52 PM PDT by hampdenkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
"I watch a lot Seagal movies, but hadn’t seen this series until tonight when flipping channels."

I watched the first season of "Lawman" when it premiered in Dec. 2009. My DVR recorded the new programs tonight. A check at IMDB showed that he's filming a new TV series titled "Southern Justice", to be aired sometime in 2011. No mention of what channel it will be on.

12 posted on 10/06/2010 8:51:13 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: looois

The only one I like is Under Siege.


13 posted on 10/06/2010 8:51:36 PM PDT by Politicalmom (A BIG TENT analogy isn’t the correct one. The correct one is a MAGNET.-Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Seagal is to acting what Obama is to political science. I saw my first Seagal movie in the early ninties and all I can remember about it is that he went into a coma with a tan and came out of the coma with a tan.


14 posted on 10/06/2010 8:56:49 PM PDT by Patrick1 (I'm a soldier of good fortune, I'm guarding the Yucatan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

He runs like a girly girl.


15 posted on 10/06/2010 9:04:33 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

As a member of a SWAT team, you have to wonder how many dogs he’s shot...


16 posted on 10/06/2010 9:13:16 PM PDT by jonascord (The Tea Party just gave the Republican senators an ice water enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
He's considered to be in the same class of action hero as Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Nonsense, Seagal is a third rate action figure that doesn't come close to movie star status as Sylvester has, and Arnold was the biggest movie star in the world.

Steven is in the category of all the Karate guys like the French guy, and the Texas Ranger guy (until he made it big in TV).

17 posted on 10/06/2010 9:15:34 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

The best thing about Steven Seagal (and most Bruce Lee) movies is that you can tune in at virtually any time in the movie and get the gist of the movie.

If you go to YouTube and search for “Best Steven Seagal” there are about 7 compilations of him fighting and whacking other guys. Since there’s little else worth bothering with in his films, this saves a heck of a lot of time.


18 posted on 10/06/2010 9:17:13 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder ("No longer can we make no mistake for too long". Barack d****it 0bama, 2009, 2010, 2011.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
I wish he and Nugent would shoot it out. I hope they tie.
19 posted on 10/06/2010 9:29:36 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Maybe Seagal should do a new tv series

Steven Seagal: Wife Beater

20 posted on 10/06/2010 9:55:36 PM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson