Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoma Sooners #1 in BCS Poll (My Title)
BCS ^ | October 17, 2010 | Self

Posted on 10/17/2010 8:51:01 PM PDT by optiguy

New BCS Poll Just Released


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: bcs; oklahoma; sooners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last
Go Sooners!
1 posted on 10/17/2010 8:51:09 PM PDT by optiguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: optiguy

Just as long as it’s not Oregon.


2 posted on 10/17/2010 8:52:47 PM PDT by tatown (Obama is Kenyan for "I make love to a woman that looks like Patrick Ewing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore); aft_lizard; Archie Bunker on steroids; Auntbee; Bad~Rodeo; Bat_Chemist; ...

Team BCS Average

1 Oklahoma .9215
2 Oregon .8921
3 Boise State .8898
4 Auburn .8641
5 TCU .8573
6 LSU .8245
7 Michigan State .7628
8 Alabama .6654
9 Utah .6540
10 Ohio State .5726
11 Missouri .5491
12 Stanford .5374
13 Wisconsin .5335
14 Oklahoma State .5261
15 Iowa .4824
16 Nebraska .4295
17 Florida State .4267
18 Arizona .3807
19 Texas .2214
20 West Virginia .1812
21 South Carolina .1555
22 Kansas State .1422
23 Arkansas .1302
24 Mississippi State .1253
25 Virginia Tech .0658


3 posted on 10/17/2010 8:54:30 PM PDT by Perdogg (Nancy Pelosi did more damage to America on 03/21 than Al Qaeda did on 09/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Agreed.


4 posted on 10/17/2010 8:56:11 PM PDT by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Ohio State # 10? BS. They should be # 30. They played nobody until last night, and they were all aglow over beating their usual non-conference cupcake foes before.


5 posted on 10/17/2010 8:58:32 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

BCS is BS..


6 posted on 10/17/2010 8:59:43 PM PDT by Tamatoa (Fight for our America, Fight for our Country I fought to defend!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

Hopefully it ends up with Boise State and TCU at #1 and #2, and then the BCS will finally crumble, to be replaced with a playoff system (just like in NCAA division II). Bowl games and the “ratings” are bunk...


7 posted on 10/17/2010 9:02:56 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optiguy; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

Gee don’t see Texas Tech anywhere on that list. Oh, maybe because Tupperware SUCKS!!!!!


8 posted on 10/17/2010 9:03:09 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

wow, I looked at Ohio State’s schedule...I noticed 4 home games in a row to start the season. Does anyone else do that?


9 posted on 10/17/2010 9:05:01 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

amen to that!


10 posted on 10/17/2010 9:05:13 PM PDT by Perdogg (Nancy Pelosi did more damage to America on 03/21 than Al Qaeda did on 09/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

1 Oklahoma 6-0
2 Oregon 6-0
3 Boise State 6-0
4 Auburn 7-0
5 TCU 7-0
6 LSU 7-0
7 Michigan State 7-0
8 Alabama 6-1
9 Utah 6-0
10 Ohio State 6-1
11 Missouri 6-0
12 Stanford 5-1
13 Wisconsin 6-1
14 Oklahoma State 6-0
15 Iowa 5-1
16 Nebraska 5-1
17 Florida State 6-1
18 Arizona 5-1
19 Texas 4-2
20 West Virginia 5-1
21 South Carolina 4-2
22 Kansas State 5-1
23 Arkansas 4-2
24 Mississippi State 5-2
25 Virginia Tech 5-2


11 posted on 10/17/2010 9:09:36 PM PDT by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I think Nebraska will beat Oklahoma. Nebraska recievers dropped three TD passes. Had they caught even one of them, the complexion of the game would have been much different.


12 posted on 10/17/2010 9:13:15 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

As an OU grad, all I can say is BOOMER SOONER!!!!


13 posted on 10/17/2010 9:14:08 PM PDT by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

This is how you know it’s all BS:

10 Ohio State 6-1
13 Wisconsin 6-1

Saturday’s final score: Wisconsin 31, Ohio State 18

Same exact record. How can the team who won the head to head be ranked lower? It’s not like Wisconsin lost to a nobody. It was Michigan State!


14 posted on 10/17/2010 9:14:17 PM PDT by RightFighter (So this is how liberty dies - with thunderous applause!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

Not that I give a ‘bleep’ but Auburn (7-0) is 3-0 against top 30 teams and no one else can touch this record at this point so—

Well. Like I said.


15 posted on 10/17/2010 9:15:21 PM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
Hopefully it ends up with Boise State and TCU at #1 and #2, and then the BCS will finally crumble, to be replaced with a playoff system (just like in NCAA division II). Bowl games and the “ratings” are bunk...

I'm a college football traditionalist and have mixed feelings about both the current BCS system and playoffs. My perception is that a playoff reduces the value of games in the regular season.

I may be wrong about that so convince me how such scheme still makes "every game count" leading up to the playoffs.

16 posted on 10/17/2010 9:24:11 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Couldn’t agree more.


17 posted on 10/17/2010 9:58:30 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

I feel sorry for OU now. #1 has been a curse the past two weeks.


18 posted on 10/17/2010 10:09:46 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Here’s how - you have the top 2 of each conference go to the playoffs. There are 12 conferences, that gives you 24 teams. Add 8 floating bids (perhaps a tossed bone to the AP/ESPN polls), and you have 32 teams. At most, a team would have 5 rounds of playoffs. Yes, that’s 5 to 6 weeks. Of course, bowl season lasts nearly that long as-is!

For conference schools, go by the conference record; use head-to-head conference wins to break any ties. For the independents, go by overall record.

For example, the PAC-10. Say USC is unbeaten, Oregon, Stanford and UCLA each have one conference loss. During the season, Stanford beat UCLA. Oregon beat Stanford. UCLA didn’t beat Stanford or Oregon. Oregon’s only loss was the USC - the conference champion. Thus the top 2 would be USC and Oregon.

Note this also makes the non-conference games not important in terms of the playoffs. There’s no reason to just schedule patsies for you to beat up on, to pad your season start. Scheduling a few “big boys” as non-conference, but sweeping your conference still gets you in. That’s got to be better than what we have now, with a lot of the perennial powerhouses (I’m looking at Nebraska and Ohio) from scheduling nominal Div I teams (teams that really belong in Div II).

I think it would work well to encourage teams to win every game - if you don’t place in the top of your conference in record, you’re not in the playoffs. Make your non-conference games about excitement and fans and rivalries - it doesn’t hurt in terms of your standings (like preseason games in the NFL).

I think it would work better than what we have now, which is a bunch of professional beer-drinkers (known as sports writers) and friends (coaches) voting for what they think is best. At least there’s a semblance of sanity in there with the computer rankings...


19 posted on 10/17/2010 10:16:46 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

That would be great, but it won’t happen.

What might is a “plus one” scheme. How often is the best team in the country not in the top 4? NEVER. So run the bowls, designate 2 as playoffs, and then have the winners play for the title. Really don’t get why they won’t at least do that.


20 posted on 10/17/2010 10:30:54 PM PDT by piytar (There is evil. There is no such thing as moderate evil. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neodad

“Death of an Offense” written by the Regents of Texas Tech University and directed by Tuberville.


21 posted on 10/17/2010 10:34:24 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (I'd rather drink Tea than Koolaid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

A Championship of Champions would be better. Take the top 6 Conferences SEC, ACC, Big 10, Big East, SWC, Pac 10 and two at large and have an 8 team Championship. Then every game of the season is actually a tourney game making an unbelievable season.

Go Ducks


22 posted on 10/17/2010 10:34:45 PM PDT by bray (A November to Remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

Texas Tech will end their season with two non-conference games this year...who the hell will care by then? Aren’t Non-conf games supposed to be the practice BEFORE your real games start?


23 posted on 10/17/2010 10:36:27 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (I'd rather drink Tea than Koolaid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

just remember. 2000 was also just supposed to be a ‘re-building’ year.


24 posted on 10/17/2010 10:42:43 PM PDT by newheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

How does this sound? Take the winners of the four BCS bowls, Rose, Fiesta, Sugar, and Orange. Based on their ranking entering those games you have #4 play #1 and #2 play #3 all at neutral fair weather sites or domed stadiums. The winners of those two games play for the championship on the off Sunday before the Super Bowl. The integrity of the regular season and conferences remain intact as does the bowls.


25 posted on 10/17/2010 10:55:28 PM PDT by skimask
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: skimask; PugetSoundSoldier
Thanks to both of you for presenting interesting and persuasive scenarios for something better than the current system. To echo a point in my initial post, I'm a traditionalist but a new approach that doesn't detract the meaning of the regular season is intriguing.

As an example of embracing the "new and improved" (and certainly not the stuff of tradition), college football overtime's system was pure genius. Initially I was skeptical of the plan, but seeing it in played out in action over the past several years (like that thrilling UDub game this past weekend) has made me a believer and a fervid advocate.

26 posted on 10/17/2010 11:30:05 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
“Death of an Offense” written by the Regents of Texas Tech University and directed by Tuberville.

...and produced by Craig James.

27 posted on 10/17/2010 11:32:07 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex; skimask

There’s got to be something better than what we have now... It simply sucks and is an abject failure - see the current rankings of Ohio State and Wisconsin! It’s heavily tilted towards favorites and subjective feel.

Decide it on the field, let the better team prove who it is. You don’t get that shot if you’re TCU or BSU. You may have a great football team but you’ll never get a chance to prove you’re “the best” because the coaches and sports writers will never vote for you in the numbers required, because they will never consider you a “big school”. Doesn’t matter what the talent really is like.

And like you, I love the overtime rules. I wish the NFL did the same thing; it’s not cool to have a hard-fought game come down to who wins a coin toss for overtime possession!


28 posted on 10/17/2010 11:41:30 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Just the usual anti PAC-10 bias. Until the bowl games come along, and they say “woops - I guess those guys were better than we thought”

The rankings are a ridiculous farce - to the point where it isn’t even worth the time to document - but ehre is an easy one -

Stanford - #12. one loss on the road at Oregon.
TOSU (another year of over rated chokers) - #10 - one loss - Wisconsin? With wins at Ohio, Eastern Michigan, and marshall? Is their quality win supposed to be Indiana or Illinois? WTF - both have most wins against like Towson, Western Kentucky, and Akron -

Seriously -

Or maybe it is Illinois’ tough wins against Southern Illinois or Northern Ilinois -

It is the same every year.

Iowa - #15 - already lost to AZ, #18. If Iowa hadn’t played a PAC-10 team, the comments would be “how good is Iowa at 6-0” etc. Where is the quality in the Iowa schedule that is missing from the AZ schedule? Is Iowa’s “quality win” Penn State? ???? Michigan? (did they really schedule Massachusetts?)

So now the Pac 10 will ruin the PAC-10 - by adding teams, and screwing with schedules, because frankly an off week in the PAC-10 is playing somebody “unranked” like USC or Washington or UCLA (destroyers of “quality teams? in other conferences.) or AZ State - lost by one to what we now know to be a powerful Wisconson team.

The jackass commentators would be asking “can Texas still play for the national title since its only loss is to OK” - if they hadn’t played UCLA and got their ass kicked. They are still ranked #19 - with two losses - based on ? one quality win over Nebraska?

OK = #1 - must be those high pressure games at Utah State, Air Force, Cincinnatti, (those three wins by a total of 12 points) Iowa State ..... well - they had that “big win” against Texas. The same Texas man-handled by the unranked UCLA average PAC-10 team. OOh - and Florida State - is the Big East still division 1?

Oregon wins - Tennesee, AZ State, Stanford - (and a rather hapless other 3.)

So - to predict the rest of the year - 50% probable Oregon will lose to some PAC-10 team, OR State, or AZ, or Washington will put together 4 good quarters - or USC or UCLA will play giant killer - then they will somehow be “overlooked” for an OK vs Auburn or LSu or AL national title game.

Oregon will go to the Rose bowl, ranked 4 or 5, play some team ranked 5 or 6 - Michigan State or Wisconsin. And dismantle them. 42-10 or something - and all the pollsters will say “gee - maybe they were better than we thought” - or make some lame excuse like “maybe TOSU was just depressed that they weren’t playing for the title” or some claptrap.

Same thing every year.


29 posted on 10/18/2010 12:00:34 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
You just wait until the OSU passing game comes online (We Buckeyes hope it's sometime this season!).

When I was a kid growing up in western New York State, we only had two channels (CBS and NBC). CBS carried NY Yankees, Cleveland Browns (Dr Frank Ryan at QB) and mostly Ohio State (Woody Hayes) with some Notre Dame. So I've been a lifelong Yankee, Browns (now Ravens) and Buckeye fan.

It's tough being around FReepers who by and large love our overpowering military but hate the overpowering Yankees and underperforming Buckeyes.

Go you Buckeyes.
Go you magnificent Yankees.
Ravens? Well, they lost the allure of Cleveland and that incredible stadium by the lake (LOL) where I saw Ted Williams go 6 for 8 in a double header against the Indians in 1957. He hit .388 that year, being 38 years old.

30 posted on 10/18/2010 3:51:08 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

I’m the last holdout on this ( the rest of you all side with Obama). I think they ought get rid of BCS, forget about play-offs,and go back to letting the conference titles mean something; the traditional bowl pairings good enough (Rose:
Big10-Pac 10, etc). The push toward “super conferences” would end, etc.It’s not like pros where the best have 10 years or more to win a championship; these boys have 4 at most. Let the smaller, regional groupings survive, I say, as I vanish in the wake.


31 posted on 10/18/2010 3:55:18 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Think you misunderstand our defintion of *Yankees* LOL!

Go Rangers! (I really can’t tolerate baseball)

\m/ HookEm!


32 posted on 10/18/2010 4:29:41 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

One of those is because they switched dates for the Texas game.

The Horns play a non-conf game towards the end of the season also.


33 posted on 10/18/2010 4:33:19 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Looks like an SEC West year. 3 in the top 10, all but the Bears in the top 25.


34 posted on 10/18/2010 5:06:39 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PaleoBob

The Auburn - LSU game next Saturday should be good.


35 posted on 10/18/2010 5:43:10 AM PDT by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: optiguy
Half the SEC in the top 25 (almost the entire Western Division). Wow! Why Auburn isn't #1 is beyond my reasoning skills. Auburn has beaten three currently BCS ranked teams (Miss St, South Carolina, and Arkansas) and should be #1. And I say that as a BAMA fan! OK is a good team and deserves to be at the top, but Oregon and Boise St??? Puhleeze. We'll see what OK has next Sat against Mizz. Oregon already had their one tough game against Stanford and won, but what's left for them should be a cakewalk. Don't get me started on Boise St having the biggest joke schedule I've ever seen. I wonder how they'd fare playing AK, FL, SC, Ole Miss and TN in five straight weeks.
36 posted on 10/18/2010 6:11:54 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

Someone is secretly removing FL teams from the Top 25. First Miami, now UF goes missing.

Go Noles! (I wonder how long it’s been since FSU was the only ranked team in FL?)


37 posted on 10/18/2010 6:12:11 AM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Excellent addition. Thank you


38 posted on 10/18/2010 6:15:08 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (I'd rather drink Tea than Koolaid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Yes, and one non-conf moved to the middle of your season isn’t a big deal but TWO at the end? Sheesh


39 posted on 10/18/2010 6:18:03 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (I'd rather drink Tea than Koolaid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: optiguy
The Auburn - LSU game next Saturday should be good.

Either way it's a win for Bama.

40 posted on 10/18/2010 6:19:43 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Eldon Tyrell
It is the same every year

Uh, didn't Ohio State win handily against the top Pac 10 team in last year's Rose Bowl? Now who was that they beat?

You might want to look it up.

41 posted on 10/18/2010 6:20:24 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

The Auburn - LSU game next Saturday should be good.


Absolutely. The outcome of that one will put the winner in the drivers seat.


42 posted on 10/18/2010 7:21:14 AM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Let’s say OU and Oregon both lose while the five undefeated teams right below them keep winning. I wonder if Auburn, Michigan State, and LSU would leapfrog Boise and TCU because of strength of schedule.


43 posted on 10/18/2010 7:28:47 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor
wow, I looked at Ohio State’s schedule...I noticed 4 home games in a row to start the season. Does anyone else do that?

Not that I know of. And, get this; it is actually the law...yes, the LAW as passed by the Ohio legislature that Ohio State MUST play an in-state school at least once a year. This year it was Ohio University, next year it will be Cincinnati. What a joke.

I despise Ohio State.

44 posted on 10/18/2010 8:28:23 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

“Death of an Offense” written by the Regents of Texas Tech University and directed by Tuberville.

I read where Leach might get an offer from Tennessee. If so, he better hope that Phil Sims son isn’t the same momma’s boy that Craig James son was. Watched him on CBSSports and must say he is one lousy color man (even admitted he might be in over his head). BUT, I always admired Leach’s offenses and ability to recruit QBs, even tho it PO’d me when they beat my ‘Horns in the last seconds.

I think he got a raw deal at Tech, but that’s the way it is these days in our pansy society. In any event, I wish him well.


45 posted on 10/18/2010 8:30:56 AM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: secondamendmentkid
Talk about stupid announcers! lol The guys announcing the Tech game this past weekend brought up the fact that Leach was now gone from Tech (as if anyone watching that game didn't know that story!) then mentioned the irony of how Leach loves pirates and was announcing the game for East Carolina State Pirates. I kept waiting for him to say AND the new Head Coach at ECU is Leach's former Defensive Coach.

Nothing - not a mention of Ruffin McNiell as the new HC. I looked at my husband and asked if they even interview these idiots before hiring them.

Oh and as an interesting tidbit - Leach got fired for putting the little princess inside a press room after he whined about his head, but Tuberville played our QB, who has a documented history of a concussion after he was hit hard enough in the jaw to need XRAYS. Now who is risking students health?

46 posted on 10/18/2010 8:41:02 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (I'd rather drink Tea than Koolaid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bray

“..Take the top 6 Conferences SEC, ACC, Big 10, Big East, SWC, Pac 10 and two at large and have an 8 team Championship...”

The old SWC (Southwest Conference) folded ~15 years ago. You must have meant the Big 12 (a new name is necessary since soon there will be only 10). Your proposal has been made in the past. I would submit that the ACC and Big East are rinky dink conferences that should be thrown in with the two at large berths and that there are often teams that didn’t win their conferences that nevertheless are legitimate contenders for winning the playoffs. So I would propose Big12, Big10, Pac10, and SEC with FOUR at large berths.


47 posted on 10/18/2010 8:41:38 AM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rhema

My question is why aren’t Auburn and LSU there NOW? OK, Boise St, TCU, nor Oregon’s schedules can touch either Auburn or LSU’s. I mean almost their entire division (save Ole Miss) is ranked in the top 25. No other conference can hold a candle to the difficulty of 8 SEC conference games.


48 posted on 10/18/2010 8:47:05 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PaleoBob
Hello from an LSU alumni...

Tigers didn't lose against 18th rated North Carolina.

Tigers won against #25 (now #20) West Virginia.

Tigers won against #14 Florida (now out but they'll be back)

Of course there will be a game Saturday which will be like a playoff game.

The "Hatter" will need all his magic...he's probably in New Orleans now.

BTW when will Auburn decide between the "War Eagles" and "Tigers"...I've never understood that and would truly like to know what the deal is.

49 posted on 10/18/2010 9:54:20 AM PDT by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

AK would be Alaska...Arkansas would be AR.


50 posted on 10/18/2010 10:04:30 AM PDT by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson