Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What about that AR-15..??
10/20/2010 | BC

Posted on 10/20/2010 8:07:51 PM PDT by Bean Counter

I'm considering the purchase of an improvable automatic rifle to augment my personal collection, and am looking for some input and guidance. There are a lot of options available and I hate reinventing the wheel. I would like to find a mainframe AR-15 that I can improve and expand upon but I am not sure of the best way to do it.

I've had my eye on the gun trader classified for my area here and to no surprise there are a lot of guns to choose from. I've found a couple of AR-15's that are way up in price ($1600 and up) and the weapons are obvious expensive boy-toys with the best fancy frills, but are of questionable value in a tactical situation. Some is a matter of personal taste, and the rest is a matter of practicality. I lean toward the latter.

There are quite a few other AR's for sale here in the local area, for about half that much and with fewer snazzy features, but how do you tell if it's worth the money?

I am no gunsmith, but I am fairly certain I could assemble what I want with the parts I have already found online, in a reasonable amount of time, and within a budget of about a Grand. I'm not sure if that is the best way to go, or if I am better off buying an inexpensive "mainframe" AR and improving it in pieces.

Some informed discussion is invited here, and I would be interested in any advice anyone has to offer. With the economy the way it is, there are a lot of people who are selling guns and ammo, and an equal number who are willing (and able) to buy.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Hobbies; Military/Veterans; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: banglist; m4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Andonius_99; Gilbo_3; smokingfrog
There are two difference, powder and chamber leade.

5.56 NATO mil-spec uses a slightly faster powder. .223 chamber dimensions, where the bullet nose is spaced to the throat of the rifling, is a couple thousandths tighter than the 5.56 chambering.

This means pressures can spike dangerously in a .223 chamber when shooting mil-spec 5.56 ammo.

61 posted on 10/21/2010 7:20:55 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

First I think you need to define what kind of “AR” you are looking for. Do you want a full on long barrel or an M-4 style? You mention tactical situations but many consider a long barrel not suitable for that. Do you want a tactical style optics or conventional glass? In short what do you think you are going to do with this weapon when you need it for it’s intended use?

BTW you should be able to put a long AR together for under $800, we do it all the time.


62 posted on 10/21/2010 7:22:00 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andonius_99; Dead Corpse; smokingfrog; Admin Moderator

post 49 should prolly be pulled, as the inferance of my mistake could be catastrophic to anyone who doesnt read the rest...


63 posted on 10/21/2010 7:27:34 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter
I'm considering the purchase of an improvable automatic rifle to augment my personal collection, and am looking for some input and guidance.
Can't help ya. I've never owned an automatic and I was Navy with no infantry/automatic weapons training. Qualified on M-1, .45, .38 and shotgun.
Owned only semi-automatic rifles for personal use. .22, .308, .30-06, 30/30 and shotguns .410, 20 and 12 gauge.
And autos cost way too much anyway IMO.
64 posted on 10/21/2010 8:24:35 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Get yourself a stripped lower and then contact either Del-Ton or Bravo Company for a parts kit. You’ll be able to put a decent AR15 together that way for about $500-$600. Then you can customize as you see fit.

If you have no experience assembling AR lowers, I’m sure there are competent smiths around you that can.


65 posted on 10/21/2010 8:35:12 AM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Love my:

Bushmaster M4 A3

66 posted on 10/21/2010 8:41:29 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sylvester McMonkey McBean
assembling can be addicting. They don’t call it Black Rifle Disease for nothing.


67 posted on 10/21/2010 8:52:48 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226
Getting my Del-Ton Dissipator kit this month. $485 sans lower receiver. 16inch barrel with full sight radius and a true rifle length gas system.

Of course I'm taking it with me on my white water rapids trip next month. ;)

68 posted on 10/21/2010 9:17:25 AM PDT by ironwill (III - Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Great form.


69 posted on 10/21/2010 9:21:06 AM PDT by Durus (The distance between us has grown, and I struggle to quantify it. Windage adjustments are done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee; Squantos
Interesting thread.

A lot of silliness, but interesting nonetheless.

70 posted on 10/21/2010 9:42:39 AM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter
An AR15 is not just a .223/5.56 caliber rifle, it's available in a wide assortment of calibers. While the .223/5.56 is an anemic round it's relatively cheap and pretty accurate. However if you want something more or less powerful you can go from .22 rimfire to .50 Beowulf in the AR platform.

The original stoner design and the majority of ar15s use a direct gas impingement system. While it does pour hot gas back into the chamber it's significantly more accurate then most piston systems at the cost of having to clean your chamber on occasion. This is one of the primary reasons ARs beat the M1A in most service level competitions. AK variants and Ruger minis simply are not in the same ball park when it comes to accuracy.

I would suggest building your own rifle. There is nothing that teaches you the inner workings better then this. The trigger, barrel, and sights/optics are what will determine your accuracy so don't scrimp in these areas.

Determine what you are going to use the rifle for. Determine the best caliber and barrel length, determine if iron sights, red dots, or magnified optics suit that choice, and buy the best trigger you can afford. Make sure the forend you choose is a free float and everything else is matter of personal preference. AR15.com and Brownells both have step by step guides.

71 posted on 10/21/2010 9:55:44 AM PDT by Durus (The distance between us has grown, and I struggle to quantify it. Windage adjustments are done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

When you say “tactical” what do you mean? For short range work, a pistol caliber carbine in .40 S&W or .45 APC (like the Hi-Point) works well. They are inexpensive and reliable.


72 posted on 10/21/2010 10:14:41 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Sweet! Okay, I’m officially jealous.
(well really just kidding, that’s a sin and all, but you get the picture)


73 posted on 10/21/2010 10:54:24 AM PDT by GYL2 (Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mrmeyer
...and twist rate 1:7 or 1:9 will be best for the bullet weight (55,62,69,77 etc)

I see a lot about the twist rate in terms of accuracy....sure, a stable bullet will squeeze out the most a system is capable of, accuracy-wise, but when you're talking about a 16 in. barrel, would not there be some advantage in having a round that is just waiting for an excuse to tumble like crazy? Never heard of any ballistic gelatin tests to confirm, but it seems the terminal ballistics of, say a 1:9 twist rate and a 62 gr. or heavier bullet would be pretty ferocious.

74 posted on 10/21/2010 11:19:59 AM PDT by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

There is a wide variance in AR15 prices, mainly having to do with their conformance to mil-specs. Mil-spec not only specifies dimensions, but materials, manufacturing processes and testing protocols. Somewhere in my archives is a table showing comformance levels of various products.

Colt rifles are mil-spec, except for their take-down pins. I believe this was done to prevent using M16 lowers with AR15 uppers. Smith and Wesson’s M&P was second on the list.

Rock River, Bushmaster, DPMS all fell somewhere in the middle. Mil-spec requirements are to ensure reliable operation in the most hostile of environments. Unless you are taking your rifle to Afganistan, the Arctic Circle or New Guinea, a middling rifle will probably work for you just fine.

My 2cents.


75 posted on 10/21/2010 11:22:46 AM PDT by Nachoman (Think of life as an adventure you don't survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
I agree that the round would tumble like crazy at close distances inflicting significant trauma.

I would like to see the military adopt the 6.8 round in the AR platform. More energy with great bullet mass would be an improvement over the 5.56x45mm. Bigger rounds = bigger holes = more trauma.
Here are some links to some ballistics tests. If you search youtube, you can find video of different AR platforms and how the various 5.56 loads stand up to ballistics gel.

M855 steel core 62 gr out of a 14.5” with 1:9 @10ft
16 inch 1:7 w/75 & 77gr @15ft
20” Colt A1 Govt Profile 1:7 w/100 gr @15ft
Criticial Review of 5.56mm effectiveness
76 posted on 10/21/2010 12:29:12 PM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Built my own around 20 years ago, and it’s easier to do so now than it was. There are a lot of lowers available fo right around 100 bucks or so. The kit to finish the lower isn’t expensive. The upper part is the only part that needs specialty tools to build, and you can get that pre-assembled and headspaced. My personal one is a “clone”of the M16A1, full 20” length. It will do pretty much anything that needs doing within the limitations of the round.

If I want to change calibers, I can get another upper and be ready to go in minutes.


77 posted on 10/21/2010 12:59:38 PM PDT by Mr Inviso (ACORN=Arrogant Condescending Obama Ruining Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

No, that’s Vanda Purvis (aka Bambi) (sort of a local celeb around here. Owns her AR-15 and is an expert marksman.) She posted on FR last year after her run-in with some cops and their ARs.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2320700/posts

see post #136


78 posted on 10/21/2010 1:29:59 PM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Get the one made by Ruger. It has many parts normally not found on over the counter AR models.


79 posted on 10/21/2010 2:05:55 PM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Montani Semper Liberi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Serious comments and suggestions are few and far between here.

Go here:
http://www.ar15.com/


80 posted on 10/21/2010 2:51:34 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson