Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Extraordinary X-rays show how 150-year-old dolls were used to smuggle drugs during U.S. Civil War
dailymail. ^ | 28th October 2010

Posted on 10/28/2010 10:28:43 AM PDT by JoeProBono

Two 150-year-old dolls have been x-rayed in a bid to discover if they were used by Confederate soldiers to smuggle medical supplies past Union blockades during the U.S. Civil War.

It is thought the large dolls - Nina and Lucy Ann - had their hollowed out papier-mache heads stuffed with quinine or morphine for wounded and malaria-stricken Confederate troops.

The Union blockade lasted from 1861 until 1865 and was intended to thwart the delivery of weapons, soldiers and supplies such as medicine to the South....

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: civilwar; dopersrights; drugs; drugwar; godsgravesglyphs; greatestpresident; history; kkkfounders; medicine; proslaverydemocrats; smugglers; smuggling; wod


1 posted on 10/28/2010 10:28:46 AM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Incredible find and a nice departure from the Bush book hysteria threads. ;)


2 posted on 10/28/2010 10:36:16 AM PDT by TSgt (Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho - 44th and current President of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
"Extraordinary X-rays show how 150-year-old dolls were used to smuggle drugs during U.S. Civil War."

"Two 150-year-old dolls have been x-rayed in a bid to discover if they were used by Confederate soldiers to smuggle medical supplies past Union blockades during the U.S. Civil War."

Hmmm.......how easy it is to change the content of the title and the text.

Smarmy media.

3 posted on 10/28/2010 10:38:57 AM PDT by EggsAckley ( There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Wars are won when you are willing to burn cities.
Wars are won when you are willing to burn food supplies.
Wars are won when you are willing to interdict medical supplies.
Wars are won when you kill as many people on the other side as possible.

No one fights better than the men and women of the US Armed Forces. Unfortunately, the government and the citizenry have become squeamish and are not sure if winning is a good idea.

4 posted on 10/28/2010 10:39:51 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

The article betrays a real ignorance of the Civil War, and of blockade running.
While the dolls may have been English made, any blockade running boat would have stored quinine or morphine supplies openly—because, if the Federals captured the blockade runner, the contents (dolls and all) would be sent north or destroyed anyway.
If these dolls were used for smuggling needed drugs, they were used by people smuggling drugs from the north. Smugglers would often go by train or boat to a place such as Memphis, TN, far from any seaport, and the dolls would be carried through the lines by civilians.
This supposition is bolstered by the fact that the donor, Confederate General Patton Anderson’s family, was from the Memphis area. And another correction—while Anderson commanded a division in the Confederate “Army of Tennessee”, he did NOT command that army, nor was there any “Tennessee Army of the Confederacy.”


5 posted on 10/28/2010 10:47:46 AM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You mean those wonderful, loving, kind Yankees were trying to keep simple medicines and painkillers from suffering humans?!?
That certainly goes against EVERYTHING the media taught me about the Civil War....hmmmmmm......


6 posted on 10/28/2010 10:49:46 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

I doubt they teach much about Sherman burning up the south either.


7 posted on 10/28/2010 10:53:12 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

I doubt they teach much about Sherman burning up the south either.


8 posted on 10/28/2010 10:53:25 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; Slings and Arrows
It is thought the large dolls - Nina and Lucy Ann - had their hollowed out papier-mache heads stuffed with quinine

Gin and tonic just isn't the same otherwise...

9 posted on 10/28/2010 10:54:46 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarguy

10 posted on 10/28/2010 10:55:01 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

The sanctions are killing children < /Saddam supporters >


11 posted on 10/28/2010 10:56:01 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Mint Julep


12 posted on 10/28/2010 10:58:46 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I generally agree with you, however the Revolution in warfare that is “Precision Guided Munitions” means that one can destroy only the military-related buildings in a city (such as Baghdad), or, you can take out only the military controlled rooms in a specific building, and minimizing damage to the civilian-occupied rooms — we are that accurate now. Warfare is changing, with regard to human casualties. I believe someone said that the military deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan during our fight there, are less than the WW2 deaths on Okinawa during a one-half hour period.


13 posted on 10/28/2010 11:03:20 AM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nabber
There is something to what you say. But I will offer this rebuttal:

In an older age, when neatly uniformed armies fought great pitched battles, there would eventually come a time when the leaders would gather around a table and sign a peace treaty. But we do not seem to live in that age any more.

Today, it's all guerrilla warfare, and so long as some bands want to keep fighting, it's very hard for anyone, on either side, to get them to stop. Each individual on that side will fight until a precision guided weapon takes him out. But a replacement is probably close to hand.

I would suggest that our smart weapons are impressive, but have not caused our enemies to sue for peace. I would further suggest that indiscriminately killing tens of thousands of men, women, and children is quite likely to cause our enemies to sue for peace.

It's common for Americans to say "We don't want to push too hard -- we might make them angry!"
I say: They attacked NYC and killed thousands of us. Nothing that we do is going to encourage them to be more fanatic than they already are. We need to make them BEG for peace.

The old ways are the best ways.

14 posted on 10/28/2010 11:13:10 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

For the time frame, I think medicinal supplies and drugs were considered one in the same. Why smarmy?


15 posted on 10/28/2010 11:21:26 AM PDT by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Smarmy because we are in the 21st century, not the 19th. I cannot believe that the author really equates medicinal supplies with common street drugs. To me, it's an incendiary attempt to “stir up” the readers.

Not a big deal, but interesting nonetheless.

16 posted on 10/28/2010 11:28:51 AM PDT by EggsAckley ( There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

I couldn’t find anywhere that the author equates medicinal supplies with common street drugs?

If so, I guess it worked on you.


17 posted on 10/28/2010 11:33:27 AM PDT by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Osprey books are usually very good. The person who wrote the Daily Mail article probably isn’t an expert in the field.
Most of the later war blockade runners were made in England for that purpose—small, fast, with shallow draft.


18 posted on 10/28/2010 11:36:06 AM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

IFFFF the South had won, would we have the situation we have on November 2, 2010??


19 posted on 10/28/2010 11:50:08 AM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

That’s actually a pic of the airport scanner when JoyBehar walked through it last weekend.


20 posted on 10/28/2010 11:55:44 AM PDT by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Yes, we would have. I fully believe the Civil War reduced the States’ rights and gave the federal government powers it did not previously have, but it was already on its way to having such powers. Previous Supreme Court cases already set that in motion. The South also was a participant.

If anything, should the South have won and it, too, followed the North with federal powers, imagine the argument today: “Well, of course it’s proper for the federal government to be so powerful, just look at the North, they do it, too.”

I don’t think the South winning would have changed much as far as federal power grabs.


21 posted on 10/28/2010 12:00:46 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr


22 posted on 10/28/2010 12:06:03 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I have spent four combat tours in Iraq and AF. The people we are fighting HAVE to be killed individually. They will NEVER sue for peace.

If we kill indiscriminately, it proves what they are saying about us and recruits flow like water. When we kill individually, the populace realizes it could have been them, and turn in and stop supporting the Jihadists.

In Iraq, we killed enough of the Jihadists, that the normal populace could turn the others in without threat of retaliation. The difference is the proximity of Pakistan which keeps producing recruits.

The good news is that we have body-tagged so much of their leadership, that the ones who take their place are nowhere near as competent and lose even more battles. But eventually, if we kill enough, they will stop fighting. They won't sue for peace, they just will turn to blowing up their own people in Pakistan or wherever they are.

23 posted on 10/28/2010 1:33:19 PM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Nina has a safety pin where her belly button should be...


24 posted on 10/28/2010 1:53:47 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Liberals are educated above their level of intelligence.. Thanks Sr. Angelica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; Michael Zak; mainepatsfan

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


Thanks JoeProBono.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


25 posted on 10/28/2010 8:29:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson