Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 things you should know about IPv6 addressing
TechRepublic ^ | 22 October 2010 | Brien Posey

Posted on 11/06/2010 8:01:03 AM PDT by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Future Snake Eater

Yes, I remember NAT well. It has been a long time though since I set up a network of any kind(except at home, naturally).


21 posted on 11/06/2010 10:07:08 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler
I wasn’t trying to be a wiseass.

I know. I just liked the way you put the question. It struck me as funny.

22 posted on 11/06/2010 10:07:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Former War Criminal

Phone numbers: country codes, area codes, prefixes and the like are probably the better analogy.

In your analogy; iP4 was zip codes, and IP6 is zip-pluse.


23 posted on 11/06/2010 10:12:07 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird; Former War Criminal

Or better yet—IPv4 is the 7-digit telephone number. IPv6 is a 21 digit telephone number. :)


24 posted on 11/06/2010 10:13:55 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Very well done!


25 posted on 11/06/2010 10:20:27 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler; Tribune7
oops. I just saw an error in my explanation.

It's not 4 32-bit numbers. It's 4 8-bit numbers, totally 32 bits.

Minor detail, but could confuse someone. :)

26 posted on 11/06/2010 10:26:37 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

gnip


27 posted on 11/06/2010 12:38:40 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
The browser takes what you type in and converts it to an Internet address.

I thought that was done by the DNS at your ISP and not the browser.

28 posted on 11/06/2010 1:14:25 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Give me your secrets, Bring me a sign, Give me a reason to walk the fire.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Well, I was trying to simplify things quite a bit. There are probably quite a few technical inaccuracies in what I wrote, but I think I explained the functional process for a beginner.


29 posted on 11/06/2010 3:24:24 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
"...but I think I explained the functional process for a beginner."

Oh...no doubt. It was a great overview. I work in IT so read that and said...."Uhmmmm...wait a second."

Just picking nits. Ask a beginner what DNS is and you'll get....well, you know.

30 posted on 11/06/2010 5:37:09 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Give me your secrets, Bring me a sign, Give me a reason to walk the fire.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
If you want to include an IPv6 address within a Universal Naming Convention, you must replace the colons with dashes and append .ipv6.literal.net to the end of the address — for example, FE80-AB00–200D-617B.ipv6.literal.net.

Interestingly, literal.net is not in use, having one of those standard for-sale pages with lots of links. It's owned by one of the most popular registrars for spam domains, they're #2 in blacklisted name servers.

31 posted on 11/08/2010 7:50:29 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Perhaps--and I'm just guessing here--literal.net is similar to the "about:****" pages on firefox. When the browser sees it, it actually goes into internal mode?

Otherwise, that is quite interesting.

32 posted on 11/08/2010 7:55:52 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

That’s what I’m guessing, except this would create a problem if anyone were to actually start using literal.net.


33 posted on 11/08/2010 9:08:25 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
...this would create a problem if anyone were to actually start using literal.net.

Hmm. :)

34 posted on 11/08/2010 11:12:27 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson