RE: “Romeny is attacked for his pro-abortion statements when running in 1994 for senate in Massachussets, and for statements made running for Governor of Mass in 2003, and as governor of Mass.
But last year FR allowed public support and posts encouraging donations to elect Scott Brown to the Senate, even though he was pro-abortion.
And the argument made was that we couldnt expect any better from Massachussetts.
Romney is evil for what he did in Massachusetts. But we allowed active support and financial help for a pro-abortion senator running in 2009 from the same state.
I do believe a lot of people are coming to regret their support of Scott Brown; my point isnt to defend Browns support (I could not send him money I dont support pro-abortion candidates).
However, the most recent dust-up (prompting the pro-life/pro-family statement) was not about abortion, it was about GOPProud and others pushing the tea party to ignore social issues and focus on the fiscal conservative issues that spawned the movement.
This site is run by a man who finds that unacceptable, and doesnt want his work to be used to push that agenda, or Romney. If I had put decades of my life into something, I wouldnt want it used to thwart my own agenda either.
That could well mean that FR is less relevant in the political arena; certainly it means that people reading here wont be getting the full picture of what is happening, since certain points of view will be censored.
But this isnt the Free Republic its FreeRepublic, a private web site we all use at the pleasure of its owner and operator. Who, despite the statements quoted in this article, actually is pretty tolerant of dissenting views, if they are expressed respectfully and occasionally, and by the rules.
***************
GREAT POST! Thanks for expressing what I was thinking.... you did it much better than I could...............
Scott Brown was the VOTE against Obamacare... which uses taxpayer dollars to provide abortions.
It seems to me supporting Brown was the pro-life thing to do.