Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supremes facing eligibility challenge to Obama, AGAIN !!!
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | December 18, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 12/20/2010 8:39:35 AM PST by Robert Drobot

"....According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.

"....one judge has ruled that the military should resolve the question over Obama's eligibility to be commander in chief while the result from the recent Lakin court martial was that Judge Denise Lind refused even to allow his defense arguments, evidence and witnesses in her courtroom, essentially withholding related due process and discovery procedures.

Conflict of interest

"In my opinion they [Elena Kagan and Sonya Sotomayor, both appointed to the bench by Obama] should recuse themselves," she said. "However until now they have refused to recuse themselves in such cases."

Taitz said the conflict is clear: they were appointed by a president who may not have had the authority to appoint them, therefore their own positions would be in jeopardy.

Kerchner brought forward the same concerns.

"The two justices appointed by Obama who in my opinion had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and they did not recuse themselves even though they should have!" he wrote.

But Taitz vs. MacDonald goes beyond Obama's legitimacy to raise the possibility of Social Security fraud.

"Legitimacy is a theoretical question," Taitz told WND earlier. "This case also presents evidence of criminal actions by Obama, showing he needs to be both removed from office and prosecuted."

Taitz said the case provides evidence generated by professional investigators showing that the Social Security number currently used by Obama is fraudulent.

"It cannot have been legally obtained," said Taitz.

Her brief asserts that Obama's Social Security number was first issued to a Connecticut resident born in 1890.

"This is evidence of fraud," Taitz said.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: certifigate; conspiracy; crime; fraud; naturalborncitizen; taitz; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Statute law, case law and most importantly, the Constitution - the bedrock of American law - no longer have any standing in what has become an Alice in Wonderland insanity of law and equity. The entire governing system is acting in concert to deny American Cittizens control of their governance in order to keep in hiden a despicable and monumental conspiratorial fraud - Barry ( Soros ) Soetoro. Today, we are informed the social security number now used by Soetoro was actually issued to a Connecticut resident born in 1890. Further, “....The two justices appointed by Obama who in my opinion had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and they did not recuse themselves even though they should have!”....” !!! All awhile these traitor robes turn their backs on their oaths to God and country. We are living the infamous Chinese curse, ‘May you live in interesting times.’
1 posted on 12/20/2010 8:39:46 AM PST by Robert Drobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

2 posted on 12/20/2010 8:52:21 AM PST by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Why is it that so many Americans have not yet realized that obama is above the Law, The only hope we have is that the military will some day do their duty and remove him since congress will not. OF course this is highly unlikely since the Lakin kangaroo trial.


3 posted on 12/20/2010 8:55:18 AM PST by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Hope springs eternal!


4 posted on 12/20/2010 9:05:06 AM PST by SERE_DOC (My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Pardon me, but doesn't that second comma pervert the intent - and meaning - of the sentence?

5 posted on 12/20/2010 9:10:42 AM PST by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
That comma does seem to be poorly chosen -- but if we place emphasis on that comma, then I think the document means you have to be a citizen to be president. Which means Schwarzenegger could run.

No. The accepted meaning is that only an NBC can be president, or someone born in this country before the Constitution was ratified. Merely being a citizen is not sufficient.

6 posted on 12/20/2010 9:15:37 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

SCOTUS will never hear a case brought by Taitz.


7 posted on 12/20/2010 9:23:07 AM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC

Yeh look for this to get tossed about 2PM today. Just like all the others.


8 posted on 12/20/2010 9:36:16 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

How do we apply public pressure for Kagan and Sotomayor to recuse themselves? Do we need to try to get our Congress-critters to mention the “impeachment” word? Do we need to write letters to the editor? Have demonstrations? What do we need to do? It is unconscionable for Obama’s stooges to be able to keep the court from hearing a case on whether they get to keep their jobs.

Who’s the head of the House Judiciary Committee?


9 posted on 12/20/2010 9:40:18 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Lamar Smith, Republican from San Antonio, TX, will chair the House Judiciary Committee.


10 posted on 12/20/2010 10:05:54 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FS11
SCOTUS will never hear a case brought by Taitz.

There you go, crushing everyone's hopes and dreams.

11 posted on 12/20/2010 10:07:42 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Those voters who voted for Obama should get ready for the military draft because there is going to be a problem of recruitment and retention of military personal since DADT was repealed... Where’s the birth certificate !!!


12 posted on 12/20/2010 10:10:24 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

How do we apply public pressure for Kagan and Sotomayor to recuse themselves? Do we need to try to get our Congress-critters to mention the “impeachment” word? Do we need to write letters to the editor? Have demonstrations? What do we need to do? It is unconscionable for Obama’s stooges to be able to keep the court from hearing a case on whether they get to keep their jobs.

Who’s the head of the House Judiciary Committee?


For a Cert Conference, only four Justices are required to agree to hear an appeal before the full court (”The Rule of Four”), therefore Kagan and Sotomayor are irrelevant to whether the Supreme Court cert conference will grant the petition for a hearing from Orly Taitz. Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas can provide the votes needed to accept this appeal.
For any Supreme Court issue or appeal, recusal is only an ethical decision of the individual Justice, there is no law and no pressure from a separate branch of government that can force recusal of a Justice.

Here’s a link to an article on recent recusals by Supreme Court Justices:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/16/us/16bar.html

I wonder if Chief Justice Roberts would recuse himself from Obama eligibility appeals because he swore Obama in as President and invited Obama to visit with the Justices at the Supreme Court as President-Elect.


13 posted on 12/20/2010 10:12:16 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
I've already pointed this out on a thread posted over the weekend, but this has nothing to do with Obama's eligibility.

This is over the $20K that the nutcase Orly Taitz was fined by the judge in one of her previous filings.

14 posted on 12/20/2010 10:14:48 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Got the pimp photo ready?


15 posted on 12/20/2010 10:20:31 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

funny, that is the first thing that I said when they passed the Sodomy Brigade Law, NO FEDERAL EMPLOYEE will ever do anything with regards to The Usurper in Chief, it is up to the STATES and THE PEOPLE, and it just might come to that.


16 posted on 12/20/2010 10:35:03 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
" funny, that is the first thing that I said when they passed the Sodomy Brigade Law, NO FEDERAL EMPLOYEE will ever do anything with regards to The Usurper in Chief, it is up to the STATES and THE PEOPLE, and it just might come to that. " ....

When push comes to shove, it will be the gays in the military who will obey orders to shoot on unarmed citizens.. mostly Christians ....
17 posted on 12/20/2010 10:46:00 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

When have you ever heard of a leftist recusing themselves? The corrupt jackals that they are, they can’t admit when they have a possible conflict of interest.


18 posted on 12/20/2010 12:02:57 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, what are you hiding? Release your Birth Certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

When have you ever heard of a leftist recusing themselves? The corrupt jackals that they are, they can’t admit when they have a possible conflict of interest.


Elena Kagen must not be a leftist then because she has recused herself on more appeals than she has heard. She has recused herself on any case that she acted on as Solicitor General.
Her latest recusal was on an appeal on Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/03/AR2010100303890.html


19 posted on 12/20/2010 12:26:00 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
...crushing everyone's hopes and dreams.

Your choice of pronouns includes you.

Typical dumb-assed Obot.

20 posted on 12/20/2010 12:32:49 PM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson