We know no more now than we knew then!
(1) Barack Hussein Obama cannot be a Natural Born Citizen, as required of Presidential candidates by the COTUS, because his father was a foreigner.
(2) The standard answer to this proposition, given by everyone from the postman to your elected Republican Congressional Representatives, is,
Proposition (1) and answer (2) have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
(2-a) There really isn't any proof one way or the other that substantiates his birth in Hawaii, beyond a weird document posted on the internet and the say-so of some Hawaiian officials who refuse to release the documentation upon which they based their statements, which happens to be required by Hawaiian law.
(3) A major difference between now and 2006:
Barack Hussein Obama has left the Senate, and is now the de facto, sitting, President of the United States.
(4)There is no clear mechanism in American Law, Custom, or Tradition for dealing with this situation. At least there is no means of dealing with it that those who might wish to use. In the meantime, teams of well-meaning (one hopes) but rather inept lawyers have not succeeded in getting their cases heard, suffering one dismissal after another on jurisdictional grounds and ironically, the eligibility of their clients to bring suit.
(5)Soon it will be 2012, and if rumors have it, Obama will run again. One governor and one state's attorney general are needed to keep Obama off one state's ballot. Seems simple enough.
Weird is the best word to describe the proffered ‘docs’ and statements by officials to date on Steve Dunham’s (to use just one of his aka’s) birth circumstance and proof of citizenship.
The COLB photo images and the circumstances for their singular unique appearance are weird. The statements by Hawaiian officials are weird for their lack of clarity and supporting records, but also for the active persistence in same obfuscatory effort, up to and including the ‘vexatious requestor’ law. The proof of marriage of Stanley Ann Dunham to Barack Obama is weird for being undocumented and unwitnessed, and inconsistent with timelines described the movements and activities of both persons in the time frame.
The weirdness maximum is what Arthur Conan Doyle called “The dog that didn’t bark.” Why hasn’t anyone in the major media or official government followed up on clear obvious weirdness. If Sarah Palin’s birth legend was as weird it would have been hunted down to every dot of a ‘i’ on every document and every shaky lead would have been chased down.
If that's in the Constitution, why didn't you know it then?