[GourmetDan]

Your argument of creating light in-transit went way beyond any ‘appearance of age’ that may exist in creating ex nihilo. The only reason you invoke in-transit light is because you accept a ‘constant c’ and ‘red-shift as distance’, both of which are assumptions made by philosophical naturalists.

Once you accept the assumption of the opponents of creation and start trying to adapt to their version of reality; you have lost the argument. That’s the point you refuse to acknowledge.

[aruanan]

Your argument of creating light in-transit went way beyond any ‘appearance of age’ that may exist in creating ex nihilo. The only reason you invoke in-transit light is because you accept a ‘constant c’ and ‘red-shift as distance’, both of which are assumptions made by philosophical naturalists.

No, it's not the only reason. In fact, it isn't any reason. I've never had any thought of a constant c and I certainly don't think that red-shift is only indicative of distance (you should have said "recessional velocity"). You're reading things into what I said in a completely unwarranted fashion.