Skip to comments.<B>Global Warming: Dire Prediction for the Year 3000</B>
Posted on 01/14/2011 8:25:06 AM PST by Mayr Fortuna
Even if humans stop producing excess carbon dioxide in 2100, the lingering effects of global warming could span the next millennia. The results? By the year 3000, global warming would be more than a hot topic - the West Antarctic ice sheet could collapse, and global sea levels would rise by about 13 feet (4 meters), according to a new study.
Using a computer model, researchers looked at two scenarios - an end to humans' industrial carbon dioxide emissions by 2010 and by 2100 - stretched out to the year 3000.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
They have designed another "model" for a 1000 years?
More hoax, more fake science, more deceptive behavior from so-called scientists in a rush to achieve the Global Governance!
The Goal is to decimate humanity!
People think about geothermal energy - when they think about it at all - in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, 'cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot . . . [Al Gore; November, 2009]
Within another thousand years, that heat is guaranteed to leak to the surface, and we're all going to die.
These people are relentless. A computer model for 1000 years from now? They can’t even tell you what the weather will be next week, next year, or next decade.
These people need to STFU and do some real work for once.
ENDING all industrial carbon emissions!
These people are summed up in the horrible remake of The Day The Earth Stood Still. Some elitist space idiot comes here to destroy all human life and everything we ever have built because “It’s not your planet” (I guess it was his?).
Then after killing and destroying millions, this genius decides that because he has the hots for Jennifer Connoly (who wouldn’t) and sees her and the little black kid cry - oops! He just figured out he can let the rest of us live, but...
The “consequence” of our survival is nothing works, zero energy! Even watches stop ticking! The consequence of our “evil” is a world with no industrialization, in which of course billions will die from famine, disease.
And like any good Al Gore hypocrite, the elitist aliens get to keep all their technology, jet around the galaxy, and tell other people how to live.
I love it.. They can’t predict the snow fall amount next week but they can predict this a 1000 years out.
Just another Flood Libel.
I predict we will be planting MORE crops in the future to feed the population and that will "fix" the carbon. That's the way God planned it. Less carbon, less food. Carbon is always moving in and out of the system, just as O2 is created from the carbon based plants.
Even if rising CO2 did warm the Earth, we could easily counter it by:
1. Lightly fertilizing the oceans with trace minerals, e.g., iron, to increase the amount of CO2 locked up in biomass. If we fertilize too much, we just stop!
2. Create high altitude clouds over the poles using aircraft dispersing particles, e.g., sulfates, just like volcanoes do. We can have warm weather and longer growing seasons where we want them while keeping the poles frozen. Once again, this is a totally controllable effect which can simply cease if required.
3. As Jerry Pournelle pointed out over 30 years ago, if the Earth gets too hot we can just paint Texas white!
In short, cooling is much easier than warming. The idea of econuts that we cannot control the climate is absurd.
Of course, the econuts totally ignore the fact that poorer countries will emit all the CO2 that they want to. If we cannot get the Chicoms or India to honor our intellectual property rights why do the econuts think we can convince them to stay poor?
I’ve head figures that if we were to reduce the CO2 to preindustrial levels, our food production would take a 12 to 13% hit and forest growth in the upper latitudes would decline by over 20%.
So, a world in which Antarctica, all of Canada, Alaska, Finland, Iceland Russia and Siberia are tropical lands, with arable soil fit for both habitation and agriculture is a bad thing? Think of all the land returned to the service of man from the last ice age, what a bummer.
Our Weatherman forecasts the high temp for the next day, with a "Three Degree Guarantee". His prediction will be within 3 degrees of the actual (so, he's really got a 7 degree range, but we won't split hairs).
He's right - within the range - about 75% of the time.
My point? A good forecaster, with access to all of the latest satellite data, modelling, and predictive technology ..... can't even reliably get the HIGH temperature right, for a snall, specific location, within a 24 hour period.
And these same clowns are making global predictions, 100 (or in this case, 1000) years out? Gimme a break. the only amazing thing this that they've not been tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail yet.
It isn’t about Global Warming. It is about power, and your money being taken away from you in a world wide scam against the free market economies.
The Dems won't rest until we are all on mopeds and living in tar paper shacks with one eco bulb hanging from an extension cord. If you press them they will even admit this is their goal. Think that's far fetched? Look at their ideas on being a super power. They openly admit they feel ashamed that we are the last world super power. They would give money to see Iran have nukes just to balance the world out and keep us on our heels. Just look at Clinton giving rocket tech to China allowing them to build rockets that will reach America. If he hadn't done that, they would be 10 years behind building even a 2 stage rocket. If we get carbon taxes, most of the money will end up in China. Bet on it.
I posted to above on my Facebook page along with the link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.