Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it a bird? No, it's definitely a plane: NASA unveils extraordinary ideas for the aircraft of 2025
Daily Mail ^ | January 16th 2011 | Staff

Posted on 01/16/2011 2:51:55 AM PST by Cardhu

They are the sort of striking images that wouldn't look out of place in a scene from a sci-fi movie. However, one of these could soon be the face of modern aviation with the unveiling of a new generation of passenger aircraft.

NASA has revealed three concept designs for quiet, energy efficient aircraft that potentially could be ready for flight as soon as 2025.

Three companies - Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and The Boeing Company - came up with the designs and, at the end of last year, all three won a contract from NASA to research, develop and test their concepts in 2011, meaning these futuristic ideas could have the potential to take flight.

The designs came about after NASA revealed it was aiming to develop a line of 'super planes'

Criteria set by NASA meant that each design had to fly up to 85 per cent of the speed of sound, cover a range of about 7,000 miles and carry between 50,000 and 100,000 of payload; either cargo or passengers.

Now, each of the three companies will spend the rest of this year exploring, testing and simulating their designs in the hope that NASA will choose it for development.

How likely it is for these designs to get off the ground is under debate. A spokesman from technology and innovation website Fast Company told the Huffington Post: 'Given how long it usually takes to craft an aircraft from scratch, and bearing in mind how many technical hitches the revolutionary Boeing 787 Dreamliner has suffered, these are the sorts of aircraft that these three firms are probably beginning to design for real right about now.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: 2025; flight; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Bigh4u2

Canada with Avro had made flying saucers as far back as the late 50s, I just don’t think they are very practical heh.


21 posted on 01/16/2011 6:26:00 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf
Yep!


22 posted on 01/16/2011 6:28:46 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

haha, that wasn’t the pic they showed us during training, but that looks comical too just like the other one did.

I still think ramjets, or scramjet engines are the way to go, you just need a secondary propulsion to get the aircraft up to speed so they can operate. Then we can cut down our travel times drastically, provided we have neutered the TSA by then heh.


23 posted on 01/16/2011 6:30:47 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

Yeah. That’s the ‘Fred Flintstone’ pic!

:)

“I still think ramjets, or scramjet engines are the way to go, you just need a secondary propulsion to get the aircraft up to speed so they can operate. Then we can cut down our travel times drastically, provided we have neutered the TSA by then heh.”

You’d have to fly it like the B2.. No real ‘stick’ but computer controlled.


24 posted on 01/16/2011 6:42:10 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OCC

LOL - everyone is laughing at my pink camera.


25 posted on 01/16/2011 6:42:10 AM PST by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

26 posted on 01/16/2011 7:00:41 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
You are probably right but my choices to put the TSA out of business are:


For the business traveller

For the small family circa 2025 - it can land and take off from water or air strip.

27 posted on 01/16/2011 7:04:34 AM PST by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

computer controlled does make me nervous I will admit. Well, one has to wonder now how they flew the SR-71, and birds that went that fast. I suppose I could google it, but the kids are up and I better feed them heh.


28 posted on 01/16/2011 7:07:20 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Thanks for the clarification. Just when you think you know the FARs, there’s a loophole...


29 posted on 01/16/2011 7:13:50 AM PST by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Thus my comment about the V-tail.


30 posted on 01/16/2011 7:50:00 AM PST by Fred Hayek (FUBO! I salute you with the soles of my shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

With the curved struts, I’d say more of a U shape.


31 posted on 01/16/2011 8:39:05 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
The feet below (and behind) the pilot make this look like a Flintstones saucer.
32 posted on 01/16/2011 4:44:43 PM PST by mcshot (So this is how it feels to be flushed. The "that's impossible" days are upon us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson