Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freep a Poll! (should Jews be allowed to pray at Temple Mount in Israel?)
nydailynews.com ^ | 3-21-11 | NY Daily News

Posted on 03/21/2011 3:45:10 PM PDT by dynachrome

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Can't offend the muzzies, now, can we?
1 posted on 03/21/2011 3:45:21 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Jews on the Temple Mount?! Never! What’s next, Catholics at the Vatican!??


2 posted on 03/21/2011 3:47:24 PM PDT by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives"-Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; all the best; AmericaUnite; ...
Thanks to Munz for the ping!
(hit piece story on Palin w/poll at site)

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

3 posted on 03/21/2011 3:47:30 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

That’s like saying are Mexicans allowed to eat in Mexican restaurants?

Duh...


4 posted on 03/21/2011 3:49:03 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Jobs? Nope! Economy? Nope! Disarm the U.S? Yep! Impeach the treasonous Marxist Muslim usurper bast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Sacred to both Muslims and Jews?

Isn’t it only important to muslims because its important to Jews?

Isn’t it only sacred to Muslims because they killed a $hitTon of Jews there?


5 posted on 03/21/2011 3:49:41 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ...In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The Pedophiles and Sissy’s at NY Daily News had to add this :Palin a failed GOP vice presidential candidate.


6 posted on 03/21/2011 3:51:39 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

They should be allowed to put their temple back up and take that Muslim house of Satan down.


7 posted on 03/21/2011 3:52:44 PM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Oh fer cryin out loud!!! I didn’t like the way the yes was phrased. It is only a muzzie sacred site because they made it one, so they could have control over the area, or say in what happens there. Jerusalem isn’t even mentioned in the Koran.


8 posted on 03/21/2011 3:57:44 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Yes. It’s a sacred site to Jews and who cares about the Muslims.
93%

No. Tensions are high enough already. Why fan more flames?
6%

Dude! What? Wait...
1%


9 posted on 03/21/2011 3:57:53 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Here's a better question:

Should Muslims be allowed?

Period.

10 posted on 03/21/2011 3:58:14 PM PDT by Dr. Sheldon Cooper (If Mohammed were alive today, he wouldnÂ’t be allowed to live within 1000 yards of a school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Exactly!!!! Jerusalem isn’t even mentioned in the Koran. They did the same thing at the Wailing Wall that they are trying to do where the twin towers once stood in NY.


11 posted on 03/21/2011 4:00:40 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Yes and as a side note - F* the Arabs who now refer to themselves as Palestinians.


12 posted on 03/21/2011 4:01:46 PM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
"Palin, a failed GOP vice-presidential candidate..."

and why do they never say "Hillary, a failed presidential candidate" Or "Obama, a former community organizer"...?

13 posted on 03/21/2011 4:02:51 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat
Yea, the question should have been, should the NY Daily News be allowed to continue printing it's garbage? Vote:
Yes it should have been put down many years ago.
No, I need toilet paper, this works great.
Or
I don't know, works pretty good at starting a fire in my fire place.
14 posted on 03/21/2011 4:04:05 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Mormons in Utah??? The Amish in - oh, wait, ...


15 posted on 03/21/2011 4:04:59 PM PDT by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White. <:)))><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Done = 93% yes


16 posted on 03/21/2011 4:08:45 PM PDT by tubebender (Now hiring Tag Line writers. Full time low pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Here’s a better idea: Israel nationalizes all holy sites.

It does this to eliminate the claims of any religion or nation to ownership of sovereign land in Israel other than embassies. Importantly, the government of Israel can then be quite liberal with its terms for “leased use” of such holy sites.

However, if a group currently leasing a site creates a public nuisance or engages in disruptive behavior, they might lose their lease, and the *administration* of that holy site would be turned over to someone else who is not pestiferous.

As an example, say the al-Asqa mosque is run by a Wahhabi faction that encourages a public riot. The Israelis could take away their rights to administer that mosque, and turn them over to, say, the Sufi sect of Islam, that of late has been more orderly and pacifist.

Even the suggestion of this would frighten the Wahhabi sect into incontinence. It is similar to the threat used by the Saud family of Saudi Arabia, when the Wahhabis who run half the country get too ambitious about displacing the Saud. The Saud just suggest that the Sufi might be better administrators than the Wahhabis. This shuts the hot heads right up.

So, what’s not to like? As sovereign Israeli property, the Israelis could declare that such holy sites are no longer “World Heritage Sites”, so they would no longer be immune from demolition if they became problematic to Israel.

This would clear the path for Israel, so that it could issue the threat that if ever again attacked by an Islamic nation, all Muslim holy sites in Israel would be permanently abolished. Razed, and rebuilt as Jewish holy sites.


17 posted on 03/21/2011 4:09:00 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MsLady

“Yea, the question should have been, should the NY Daily News be allowed to continue printing it’s garbage? Vote:
Yes it should have been put down many years ago.
No, I need toilet paper, this works great.
Or
I don’t know, works pretty good at starting a fire in my fire place.”

LMAO Good ones!


18 posted on 03/21/2011 4:11:54 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

Thank you ;)


19 posted on 03/21/2011 4:16:40 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Slight change of approach ... award the site access, management and control over the cost for visitation to the highest bidder for a two year lease sold as a public auction with full disclosure of the bids.

Restrictions or forfeture of the lease can be caused by failure to protect the site from damage, incitement to riot or hatred, etc.


20 posted on 03/21/2011 4:30:05 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson