Obama Long Form Layers?

docs.google.com ^ | April 27, 2011 | unknown

[agere_contra]

Yes, two different maternity wards! One for the B/C, and one for, uh, the place in Kenya where he was actually born.

Ok, I’ve got nothing. I’ve never been in a maternity ward (not even when I was born) and I’m reduced to guessing how they operate.

[1L]

Any 10 year old who claims to know more about hospitals than I do would probably be right, but I would have a hard time believing that preplanned births — as opposed to, say, a C section done due to an accident in ER — would take place in 2 different sections of the hospital.

I n the last 15 or so years, I do know some births are done in the patient’s room in some hospitals. So, you may be entirely correct.

[aimhigh]

Yet all the green security paper pattern lines up?

When I zoomed into the image, I was surprized I couldn't see any green pattern touching any letters. They should touch if the letters were typed on such paper. There is a white halo around all the text.

[bolobaby]

The “R” in Barack is subject to the same problem as any of the stamped numbers on the page. And, for that matter, ANY of the typed or handwritten sections.

Think about it:

High resolution scanners are very sensitive to slight color/shade variations. On old typewriters, the shade of a letter was linked to the amount of pressure applied to the keys. (Or, in some cases, depending on fast the typist was typing, whether or not the letter arms impacted against each other and lost energy on their way to the paper.)

Soooo...

If the “R” was not pressed as firmly as the other letters, it would have left a lighter impression on the paper. When the scanner picked it up, the lighter color was treated as gray instead of black and was subject to a different anti-aliasing technique.

Same thing with handwriting. The hand can apply different amounts of pressure OR the ink can come out darker when you begin writing versus when your word/sentence completes. Everyone has experienced that while writing with pens. Therefore, the scanner would treat these sections as a slightly different color/shade and give a different anti-aliasing technique.

Couple that with an OCR technology that is trying to pull text of all the same shade off the page, and you could easily wind up with layers.

I’m growing more convinced that we are looking at an actual copy of the real document Hawaii has on file. I don’t believe anything has been doctored.

If this is the case, good on Obama for finally releasing this and putting the BC question to bed. Now we can focus on how he is destroying the country.

(What a bastard for holding on to it for so long, though, and letting the issue tear the country up. Man, I hate this guy.)

[piytar]

I’m comung around to your way of thinking. That said, I know some real experts are tearing into this. Will await their reports before committing 100% to “it’s real.”

[fightinJAG]

I don’t know about any of this, but people ought to keep copies of what they’re analyzing. But y’all know that.

[fightinJAG]

Yep.

[fightinJAG]

IIRC, Corsi has said the seemingly out-of-order certificate numbers was simply caused by stacks of blanks being handed out to several clerks, which then used whichever one was next.

[hadcat]

Here is a real certificate.

http://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nordykebirthcertificate1.jpg

Notice the file number..the filing date Aug 11 1961 with File number 61 10637

The Obama filing date is BEFORE and so is the date of birth...The filing number is 61 10641 which is a later number.

Obama’s number should be lower or less than 61 10637..Not Larger!

See the problem?

[CMAC51]

“What is this supposed to be? What is with the curled page set on top of another page. That is clearly what was done. Yet all the green security paper pattern lines up? This doesn’t even make sense. “ This one point is a non-starter. the give away that it is a forgery can be seen in the signatures. Open the PDF and magnify to maximum. The signature of the doctor and register are composed of digital blocks twice as wide and high as the digital blocks of the dates corresponding to them. This cannot happen in a single source document. The signature and the date came from documents with different base resolutions.

[chicken head]

http://michaeljmaxim.blogspot.com/2011/04/youtube-obama-birth-certificate-fraud.html?amp&;

[bolobaby]

See post 84.

OCR technology embedded in the scanning process could very easily produce layers as it looks for text of the same shade and separates it out from the background “noise” in order to pass it through an OCR algorithm.

So, it depends on the scanning technology used, I think.

[bolobaby]

The block size difference is only when you compare apples to oranges. That is, anti-aliased sections to non-anti-aliased sections.

See my post #84. Then look at the document again. The portions of the signature which scanned as pure black - and therefore NON anti-aliased - are the exact same block size.

[hadcat]

The certificate is made up of 9 image files...I was able to extract them all.

[hadcat]

Here are the 9 images that make up the one certificate. Any ideas why? Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7 Number 8 Number 9

[itsahoot]

All we need is Snarling Arlin Spector to do a study and show exactly how the layers got there. Should be simple compared to a magic bullet. Actually two magic bullets if we include the one that fell out of Kennedy without a mark on it.

[itsahoot]

Not just CNN, FOX as well. It is settled, just like the Science of Global Warming is settled Science. We have been had, the faux news have proclaimed the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but truth, so get over it.

Oh and please overpay your taxes, buy smaller cars and go green.