Skip to comments.Orly Taitz: Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate Should Say 'Negro' Not 'African'
Posted on 04/27/2011 10:54:31 AM PDT by jdoug666
"In those years ... when they wrote race, they were writing 'Negro' not 'African'," Taitz says. "In those days nobody wrote African as a race, it just wasn't one of the options. It sounds like it would be written today, in the age of political correctness, and not in 1961 when they wrote white or Asian or 'Negro'."
(Excerpt) Read more at tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com ...
Didn’t the governor of Hawaii say a couple of months ago that there was no birth certificate on file in the state records for Obama? Yet today, a copy is released. WTF?
Why no embossed state seal on this copy also?
I am old enough to know it should have been negro. As soon as it said African I knew it had to be a fraud.
It’s interesting that when the left fakes zero’s long form, they find themselves unable to use the verbage of the day, rather they must follow their politically correct belief system and put his father’s race as African. I’m surprised they listed his mother as caucasian and not whity :-)
Are you pretending to be stupid? Or you just being obtuse?
born June 14, 1946 (Meets the 35 years Minimum age Requirement)
in Queens, New York, NY (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Father: Frederick Christ Trump, born October 11, 1905 in Queens, NY, died June 1999 in Queens, NY
Mother: Mary Ann MacLeod, born May 10, 1912 in SCOTLAND, died August 7, 2000 in Queeens, NY. Arrived in US October 5, 1935. Married January 1936. Naturalized as a US Citizen March 10, 1942.
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguninis Requirement)
Donald Trump is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN with sole allegiance (due to both his parents being US Citizens) to the United States and thus meets the founders intent to meet Article 2 Section 1 of the constitution for President. “
Not just a scanned copy!
So whatever staffer created this was attempting to avoid the problem with the areas around the altered wording being blanked out.
I am not sure about the white thing. I remember forms from that era not having “white” but “Caucasian”.
The point of this Country is it was established with a Constitution that secures our individual freedom, and protects us from a federal government that denies the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution.
Every military person, Congressman, Senator or any other fed feeding at the public trough, swears to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Why do we not want to defend the Constitution?
Strangely they had African in the first forgery, must be stuck with it, were they lying then or are they lying now. :)
He mother became a citizen before he was born, therefore he is a NBC.
Actually, the Lee name was listed as the Local Registrar on Obama’s certificate. However, on the Nordyke twins certificate, the Local Registrar was someone different. Obama and the Nordykes were born 7 days apart. I can’t imagine (but, I’m speculating) that Honolulu had more than one Local Registrar.
She may be right, but we don’t need a nutcase like her bringing it up and tarnishing the TEA Party.
I don’t see it as a big deal. BO Sr. wasn’t simply black like nearly all of the blacks in the country at the time, i.e., descendants of American slaves taken from western Africa, who spoke English and lived an American lifestyle. BO Sr.’s physical features were very different from most American blacks, he must have spoken English with a strong accent, and was known to be a transfer student from Africa. I can see a clerk making that distinction by stating “African,” even where the typical entry would have been Negro, black or whatever.
fathers race .. AFRICAN???
dr.s name ... U.K. leLee (ukulele)???
I think the local registrar's name is Lee, not the doctor's name.
Doctor's name: I can't read his handwriting. Can anyone make it out what the doctor's name is? Thanks.
Africans are of many races, Negro, Pigmy, Caucasians of various varieties.
The Races of Humanity, by Richard McCulloch
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA GROUP
I. Capoid or Khoisanid Subspecies of southern Africa
A. Khoid (Hottentot) race
B. Sanid (Bushmen) race
II. Congoid Subspecies of sub-Saharan Africa
A. Central Congoid race (Geographic center and origin in the Congo river basin)
1. Palaecongoid subrace (the Congo river basin: Ivory Coast, Ghana, Nigeria, Cameroon, Congo, Angola)
2. Sudanid subrace (western Africa: Niger, Mali, Senegal, Guinea)
3. Nilotid subrace (southern Sudan; the ancient Nubians were of this subrace)
4. Kafrid or Bantid subrace (east and south Africa: Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, Natal)
B. Bambutid race (African Pygmies)
C. Aethiopid race (Ethiopia, Somalia; hybridized with Caucasoids)
III. Caucasoid or Europid Subspecies
F. Mediterranid racial group
1. Orientalid or Arabid subrace (predominant in Arabia, major element from Egypt to Syria, primary in northern Sudan, important in Iraq, predominant element among the Oriental Jews)
2. South Mediterranean or Saharid subrace (predominant in Algeria and Libya, important in Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt, primary element among the Sephardic Jews, common element [circa 20-25%] in Spain, Sicily and southern Italy, minor element [circa 5%] in Greece)
As I posted on another Thread:
If I Zoom in on the area of the document with the signatures, the signatures pop up first and then the printed or typed text shows up later. Try it!
Im no expert on PDF files, but there is no way this would happen if the document was scanned then saved as a PDF. The signatures have to be on a different layer. One or the other (or both) were created separately. Something fishy here!
Also, in Block 20, the last numeral 1 in 1961 appears much sooner than the rest of the date.
Even more strange is that in Block 18a, Ann D appears sooner than the unham part of the signature.
The more I look at the PDF the more it seems that whoever made it left LOTS of clues that it is a creation rather than a simple photocopy of a real Birth Certificate bound in a folder in the archives in Hawaii.
In Block 6c the capital I in Institution is sans serif. Everything else is in a serif font.
In Block 18a pixelation on the unham portion of the signature is much smaller than that on the D.
It looks like you have a full copy of Adobe Acrobat. Can you dissect this thing?
“They would not have done something as stupid as writing african in the box if they were forging it.”
They had to match what was on the previously released short form BC. If they didn’t, one or the other would have to be obviously fake. They had to match up the info.