Skip to comments.
55 Feet Long Unknown Fish Species Found in China
IBT ^
| 29 April 2011
| IBT
Posted on 05/01/2011 10:45:03 AM PDT by Palter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
05/01/2011 10:45:07 AM PDT
by
Palter
To: Palter
I think its called a “whale”
2
posted on
05/01/2011 10:47:32 AM PDT
by
PGR88
(I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
To: PGR88
LOL Those were my first thoughts too!
3
posted on
05/01/2011 10:49:11 AM PDT
by
melsec
To: Palter
He only had 8,000 lb test line on his reel.
4
posted on
05/01/2011 10:50:13 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: PGR88
Sure, but a dead whale isn’t much to of a thread, unless they blow it up. I go with giant made in china fish that lost a battle with Trump.
5
posted on
05/01/2011 10:50:32 AM PDT
by
Palter
(If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it. ~ Mark Twain)
To: DManA
Breeding grounds just NE of Fukushima, Japan.
To: Zuben Elgenubi
To: Palter
To: Palter
9
posted on
05/01/2011 10:58:02 AM PDT
by
SouthDixie
(The secret to staying young is to live honestly, eat slowly and lie about your age.)
To: Palter
Is this a long fish that has 55 feet?
10
posted on
05/01/2011 10:58:03 AM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Monarchy is the one system of government where power is exercised for the good of all - Aristotle)
To: Palter
You should have seen the one that got away..
11
posted on
05/01/2011 10:58:30 AM PDT
by
Kid Shelleen
(Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
To: Palter
These things don’t jump like those Asian Carp, do they?
12
posted on
05/01/2011 10:58:30 AM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: Zuben Elgenubi
13
posted on
05/01/2011 10:59:04 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Palter
Probably a less hideous relative of Henry Waxman or James Carville.
14
posted on
05/01/2011 11:02:15 AM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: Zuben Elgenubi
That is a funny picture :)
16
posted on
05/01/2011 11:12:58 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: Palter
According to the bible Jonah was swallowed by a fish and to some skeptics this proves that the bible is in error because fish are not large enough and that only a whale is large enough and whales are not fish.
17
posted on
05/01/2011 11:21:27 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: PGR88
Are whales considered fish?
To: Palter
Scituate Sea Monster redux.
19
posted on
05/01/2011 11:23:36 AM PDT
by
DBrow
To: PGR88
I think its called a whaleThe Bible says it was a 'great fish'...
20
posted on
05/01/2011 11:25:45 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 829 of our national holiday from reality. - It's 3 AM, time to arrest Obama)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson