Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They’re gonna flood the drywell?
Wormme.com ^ | May 5, 2011 | Wormme

Posted on 05/05/2011 10:01:43 PM PDT by ransomnote

They’re gonna flood the drywell? Posted on May 5, 2011 by wormme

That’s what I get from this TEPCO proposal (http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu11_e/images/110505e2.pdf). Correct me if I’m wrong.

Since it is unusual to flood the primary containment vessel (dry/well)…

Er…yes, that’s pretty unusual. As in, “never been done before, to my knowledge”. That’s a lot of water. But they seem confident the added stress won’t be problematic. And if I’m reading it right, they expect it to decrease the amount of rad material being spread from containment.

The only adverse side effect I see is that they might get overflow into a trench. If that overflows it goes to the turbine building. But they’ll be pumping out from the trench into the Waste Treatment Facility.

Wow. Sure hope they cyphered it twice, as Jethro would say.

(Excerpt) Read more at wormme.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: drywell; fukushima; nukeplant
Guy is a rad tech whom I have found helpful in evaluating media reports and technical information re Fukushima.
1 posted on 05/05/2011 10:01:50 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

PS: TEPCO is referring to reactor 1 in Fukushima.


2 posted on 05/05/2011 10:03:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Since the containment is a pressure vessel, there’s no possibility of water getting out of the containment building through a trench anywhere. I can understand using the water as a radiation moderator to allow workers more time to work in the containment.


3 posted on 05/05/2011 10:06:51 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Apparently the concern is seismic (if I understood what I just read here:
http://seekerblog.com/2011/05/01/nisa-instructs-tepco-to-study-demonstrate-dry-well-flooding-is-safe-from-seismic/

They’ve had a few days so perhaps NISA and TEPCO have decided that it is seismically safe? Seems like their seismic concern has to do with going forward - drywell filled with water and then large aftershock hits?
http://seekerblog.com/2011/05/01/nisa-instructs-tepco-to-study-demonstrate-dry-well-flooding-is-safe-from-seismic/


4 posted on 05/05/2011 10:12:59 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Looking a little further, I was pleased to find
“-TEPCO has finally revealed some details about the actual construction of the temporary cooling system it will install.. at least at Unit No. 1. Here is a clip from the handout:”
Followed by a schematic that I don’t know how to embed but you can see it at the link:
http://atomicpowerreview.blogspot.com/

in case you are interested


5 posted on 05/05/2011 10:23:48 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“They’ve had a few days so perhaps NISA and TEPCO have decided that it is seismically safe? Seems like their seismic concern has to do with going forward - drywell filled with water and then large aftershock hits?”

It reads like they peformed the seismic analysis to ensure the integrity of the drywell if an earthqualke occurs while it is flooded.


6 posted on 05/05/2011 11:28:36 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson